Erratum for “Chunking Versus Transitional Probabilities: Differentiating Between Theories of Statistical Learning”

IF 2.3 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/cogs.13472

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerson, S. N. & Conway, C. M. (2023). Chunking versus transitional probabilities: Differentiating between theories of statistical learning. Cognitive Science, 47(5), e13284. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13284

Pre-Registration section lists an incorrect website for the project data. Data for the study can be found at https://osf.io/tnzky or through the full project page at https://osf.io/dr4ec.

We apologize for the oversight.

查看原文本刊更多论文

分块概率与过渡概率：区分统计学习理论 "的勘误。

Emerson, S. N. & Conway, C. M. (2023).分块概率与过渡概率：统计学习理论的区别。Cognitive Science, 47(5), e13284. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13284Pre-Registration 部分列出的项目数据网站不正确。该研究的数据可在 https://osf.io/tnzky 或通过 https://osf.io/dr4ec.We 的完整项目页面找到，对这一疏忽深表歉意。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

8.00%

发文量

139

期刊介绍： Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.