The Intersection of Pedagogy and Andragogy in 3 + 2-Modeled Physician Assistant Programs: Five Lessons Learned.

Q2 Health Professions
Chelsey Hoffmann
{"title":"The Intersection of Pedagogy and Andragogy in 3 + 2-Modeled Physician Assistant Programs: Five Lessons Learned.","authors":"Chelsey Hoffmann","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physician associate/assistant (PA) faculty benefit from learning the definitions and applications of pedagogy and andragogy within PA education. However, we are now in an era where PA learners may fall along the continuum between pedagogy and andragogy, particularly in PA programs with a preprofessional phase such as the 3 + 2 model. Given PA programs with a preprofessional phase now make up 12.7% of all PA programs, faculty need to be equipped with effective strategies and techniques for engaging this population of learners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were queried to find existing research on the topics of andragogy and pedagogy in 3 + 2-modeled PA programs. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education was also reviewed for articles relevant to these topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is minimal evidence to guide PA faculty on education models, theory, or learning philosophy for students enrolled in 3 + 2 PA programs . As such, this manuscript presents 5 lessons learned from a former faculty member of a 3 + 2-modeled PA program who has experience teaching both traditional PA students in addition to 3 + 2 learners.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The 5 lessons learned include the importance of scaffolding, explaining the \"why,\" emphasizing knowledge acquisition, integrating novel learning experiences, and creating channels for communication. While each of these lessons will apply to all PA students, they may be particularly impactful to those in 3 + 2-modeled PA programs. Moving forward, PA education would benefit from research dedicated to PA programs with a preprofessional phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physician associate/assistant (PA) faculty benefit from learning the definitions and applications of pedagogy and andragogy within PA education. However, we are now in an era where PA learners may fall along the continuum between pedagogy and andragogy, particularly in PA programs with a preprofessional phase such as the 3 + 2 model. Given PA programs with a preprofessional phase now make up 12.7% of all PA programs, faculty need to be equipped with effective strategies and techniques for engaging this population of learners.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were queried to find existing research on the topics of andragogy and pedagogy in 3 + 2-modeled PA programs. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education was also reviewed for articles relevant to these topics.

Results: There is minimal evidence to guide PA faculty on education models, theory, or learning philosophy for students enrolled in 3 + 2 PA programs . As such, this manuscript presents 5 lessons learned from a former faculty member of a 3 + 2-modeled PA program who has experience teaching both traditional PA students in addition to 3 + 2 learners.

Discussion: The 5 lessons learned include the importance of scaffolding, explaining the "why," emphasizing knowledge acquisition, integrating novel learning experiences, and creating channels for communication. While each of these lessons will apply to all PA students, they may be particularly impactful to those in 3 + 2-modeled PA programs. Moving forward, PA education would benefit from research dedicated to PA programs with a preprofessional phase.

3+2 模式助理医师课程中教学法与教法的交叉:五条经验教训。
导言:助理医师(PA)教职员工从学习 PA 教育中的教学法和教育学的定义和应用中获益匪浅。然而,我们现在所处的时代是,PA 学习者可能处于教学法和教育法之间的连续统一体中,尤其是在具有专业前阶段(如 3+2 模式)的 PA 课程中。鉴于具有专业预科阶段的 PA 课程目前占所有 PA 课程的 12.7%,教师需要掌握有效的策略和技巧来吸引这部分学习者:方法:查询了 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 数据库,以查找有关 3+2 模式 PA 课程的教学法和教学法主题的现有研究。此外,还查阅了《助理医师教育杂志》中与这些主题相关的文章:在针对 3 + 2 PA 项目学生的教育模式、理论或学习理念方面,指导 PA 教师的证据少之又少。因此,本手稿介绍了一位曾在 3 + 2 模式的 PA 项目中任职的教师所汲取的 5 条经验,该教师既有教授传统 PA 学生的经验,也有教授 3 + 2 学习者的经验:讨论:这5条经验包括支架的重要性、解释 "为什么"、强调知识的获取、整合新颖的学习体验以及创建交流渠道。虽然这些经验适用于所有学习 PA 课程的学生,但对那些学习 3+2 模式 PA 课程的学生影响尤为深远。展望未来,专业助理医师教育将受益于专门针对专业助理医师课程预科阶段的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信