Celeste M Donato, Susie Roczo-Farkas, Sarah Thomas, Nada Bogdanovic-Sakran, Eleanor A Lyons, Julie E Bines
{"title":"Australian Rotavirus Surveillance Program Annual Report, 2022.","authors":"Celeste M Donato, Susie Roczo-Farkas, Sarah Thomas, Nada Bogdanovic-Sakran, Eleanor A Lyons, Julie E Bines","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This report from the Australian Rotavirus Surveillance Program describes the circulating rotavirus genotypes identified in children and adults during the period 1 January to 31 December 2022. After two years of a lower number of stool samples received as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this reporting period saw the highest number of samples received since the 2017 surveillance period, with samples received from all states and territories. During this period, 1,379 faecal specimens had been referred for rotavirus G- and P- genotype analysis, of which 1,276 were confirmed as rotavirus positive. In total, 1,119/1,276 were identified as wildtype rotavirus, 155/1,276 identified as the Rotarix vaccine strain and 2/1,276 that could not be confirmed as vaccine or wildtype due to sequencing failure. Whilst G12P[8] was the dominant genotype nationally among wildtype samples (28.2%; 315/1,119), multiple genotypes were identified at similar frequencies including G9P[4] (22.3%; 249/1,119) and G2P[4] (20.3%; 227/1,119). Geographical differences in genotype distribution were observed, largely driven by outbreaks reported in some jurisdictions. Outbreaks and increased reports of rotavirus disease were reported in the Northern Territory, Queensland, and New South Wales. A small number of unusual genotypes, potentially zoonotic in nature, were identified, including: G8P[14]; G10[14]; caninelike G3P[3]; G6P[9]; and G11P[25]. Ongoing rotavirus surveillance is crucial to identify changes in genotypic patterns and to provide diagnostic laboratories with quality assurance by reporting incidences of wildtype, vaccine-like, or false positive rotavirus results.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: This report from the Australian Rotavirus Surveillance Program describes the circulating rotavirus genotypes identified in children and adults during the period 1 January to 31 December 2022. After two years of a lower number of stool samples received as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this reporting period saw the highest number of samples received since the 2017 surveillance period, with samples received from all states and territories. During this period, 1,379 faecal specimens had been referred for rotavirus G- and P- genotype analysis, of which 1,276 were confirmed as rotavirus positive. In total, 1,119/1,276 were identified as wildtype rotavirus, 155/1,276 identified as the Rotarix vaccine strain and 2/1,276 that could not be confirmed as vaccine or wildtype due to sequencing failure. Whilst G12P[8] was the dominant genotype nationally among wildtype samples (28.2%; 315/1,119), multiple genotypes were identified at similar frequencies including G9P[4] (22.3%; 249/1,119) and G2P[4] (20.3%; 227/1,119). Geographical differences in genotype distribution were observed, largely driven by outbreaks reported in some jurisdictions. Outbreaks and increased reports of rotavirus disease were reported in the Northern Territory, Queensland, and New South Wales. A small number of unusual genotypes, potentially zoonotic in nature, were identified, including: G8P[14]; G10[14]; caninelike G3P[3]; G6P[9]; and G11P[25]. Ongoing rotavirus surveillance is crucial to identify changes in genotypic patterns and to provide diagnostic laboratories with quality assurance by reporting incidences of wildtype, vaccine-like, or false positive rotavirus results.