Rapid jail-based implementation of overdose education and naloxone distribution in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Carrie B Oser, Margaret McGladrey, Marisa Booty, Hilary Surratt, Hannah K Knudsen, Patricia R Freeman, Danelle Stevens-Watkins, Monica F Roberts, Michele Staton, April Young, Emma Draper, Sharon L Walsh
{"title":"Rapid jail-based implementation of overdose education and naloxone distribution in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Carrie B Oser, Margaret McGladrey, Marisa Booty, Hilary Surratt, Hannah K Knudsen, Patricia R Freeman, Danelle Stevens-Watkins, Monica F Roberts, Michele Staton, April Young, Emma Draper, Sharon L Walsh","doi":"10.1186/s40352-024-00283-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People incarcerated in jails are highly impacted by the opioid epidemic, and overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) is an effective strategy to reduce opioid overdose deaths. This study examines barriers and facilitators of fast-track OEND implementation within the jails in the Wave 1 Kentucky counties of the HEALing Communities Study during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Meeting minutes with jail stakeholders were qualitatively coded using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) as the coding framework. The analysis highlighted the top barriers and facilitators to fast-track OEND implementation within the PRISM framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Space and staffing shortages related to the COVID-19 pandemic, disruptions in interorganizational programming from pandemic-related service suspensions, and a lack of technological solutions (e.g., reliable Internet access) for socially distanced delivery were the top barriers to fast-track OEND implementation. In addition, there were limitations on non-jail staff access to jails during COVID-19. Top facilitators included jail leadership support, the option to prioritize high-risk groups, and the incorporation of OEND processes into existing communications and management software. While the COVID-19 pandemic strained jail infrastructure, jail and partner agency collaboration led to creative implementation strategies for the successful integration of OEND into jail operations. Urban jails were more likely than rural jails to be early adopters of OEND during the public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the barriers to and facilitators of OEND within jails will improve implementation efforts seeking to curb opioid overdose deaths. Jail leadership support and interorganizational efforts were key facilitators to implementation; therefore, it is recommended to increase buy-in with multiple agencies to promote success. Challenges brought on by COVID-19 have resulted in a need for innovative solutions for implementation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04111939, Submitted 30 September 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04111939?titles=HEALing%20Communities%20Study&rank=1 .</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"12 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11212218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-024-00283-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People incarcerated in jails are highly impacted by the opioid epidemic, and overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) is an effective strategy to reduce opioid overdose deaths. This study examines barriers and facilitators of fast-track OEND implementation within the jails in the Wave 1 Kentucky counties of the HEALing Communities Study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Meeting minutes with jail stakeholders were qualitatively coded using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) as the coding framework. The analysis highlighted the top barriers and facilitators to fast-track OEND implementation within the PRISM framework.

Results: Space and staffing shortages related to the COVID-19 pandemic, disruptions in interorganizational programming from pandemic-related service suspensions, and a lack of technological solutions (e.g., reliable Internet access) for socially distanced delivery were the top barriers to fast-track OEND implementation. In addition, there were limitations on non-jail staff access to jails during COVID-19. Top facilitators included jail leadership support, the option to prioritize high-risk groups, and the incorporation of OEND processes into existing communications and management software. While the COVID-19 pandemic strained jail infrastructure, jail and partner agency collaboration led to creative implementation strategies for the successful integration of OEND into jail operations. Urban jails were more likely than rural jails to be early adopters of OEND during the public health emergency.

Conclusions: Understanding the barriers to and facilitators of OEND within jails will improve implementation efforts seeking to curb opioid overdose deaths. Jail leadership support and interorganizational efforts were key facilitators to implementation; therefore, it is recommended to increase buy-in with multiple agencies to promote success. Challenges brought on by COVID-19 have resulted in a need for innovative solutions for implementation.

Clinical trial information: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04111939, Submitted 30 September 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04111939?titles=HEALing%20Communities%20Study&rank=1 .

为应对 COVID-19 大流行,在监狱中迅速开展用药过量教育和发放纳洛酮。
背景:监狱中的囚犯深受阿片类药物流行病的影响,而药物过量教育和纳洛酮发放(OEND)是减少阿片类药物过量死亡的有效策略。本研究探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在肯塔基州第一波 "健康社区研究"(HEALing Communities Study)县的监狱中快速实施 OEND 的障碍和促进因素:方法:使用 "实用、稳健实施和可持续性模型"(PRISM)作为编码框架,对监狱利益相关者的会议记录进行定性编码。分析强调了在 PRISM 框架内快速实施 OEND 的主要障碍和促进因素:结果:与 COVID-19 大流行相关的空间和人员短缺、与大流行相关的服务暂停导致的组织间计划的中断,以及缺乏技术解决方案(如可靠的互联网接入)来实现社会远程交付,是快速实施 OEND 的最大障碍。此外,在 COVID-19 期间,非监狱工作人员进入监狱受到限制。最大的促进因素包括监狱领导的支持、优先考虑高风险群体的选择,以及将 OEND 流程纳入现有的通信和管理软件。虽然 COVID-19 大流行对监狱基础设施造成了压力,但监狱和合作机构的协作促成了创造性的实施策略,成功地将 OEND 纳入监狱运作。在公共卫生突发事件期间,城市监狱比农村监狱更有可能成为 OEND 的早期采用者:结论:了解在监狱中实施 OEND 的障碍和促进因素将有助于改进实施工作,从而遏制阿片类药物过量死亡。监狱领导的支持和组织间的努力是促进实施的关键因素;因此,建议加强与多个机构的合作,以促进成功。COVID-19 带来的挑战使得我们需要创新的实施方案:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04111939,2019 年 9 月 30 日提交,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04111939?titles=HEALing%20Communities%20Study&rank=1 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信