[Prognostic Factors Affecting Recurrence in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients with Different HDAC Levels].

Q4 Medicine
Ying-Xin Li, Yi-Dan Li, Pei Wang, Hui-Jie Jiao, Ying Li, Jing Zhang, Xian-Hua Yuan
{"title":"[Prognostic Factors Affecting Recurrence in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients with Different HDAC Levels].","authors":"Ying-Xin Li, Yi-Dan Li, Pei Wang, Hui-Jie Jiao, Ying Li, Jing Zhang, Xian-Hua Yuan","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the distribution characteristics of prognostic factors affecting recurrence in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients with different levels of histone deacetylase (HDAC) based on latent class analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>112 PTCL patients who were treated in our hospital from September 2012 to September 2019 were selected and divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group. The clinical data of the two groups of patients were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for recurrence. Latent class analysis was used to compare the distribution characteristics of prognostic factors affecting recurrence between the high-risk group and the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 87 patients (77.68%) in recurrence group and 25 patients (22.32%) in non-recurrence group. The result of multivariate logistic regression showed that ECOG score ≥2, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, IPI score >2, bone marrow involvement, elevated serum β<sub>2</sub>-microglobulin (β<sub>2</sub>-MG), short-term efficacy not reaching complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR), and the high expression of HDAC were all independent risk factors for recurrence in patients with PTCL (<i>P</i> <0.05). The recurrence rate of patients with high HDAC levels was significantly higher than that of patiens with low HDAC levels (<i>P</i> <0.05). The results of cluster analysis showed that the risk of recurrence was obviously clustered, and the patients could be divided into high recurrence risk group (HDAC>5 points) and low recurrence risk group (HDAC≤5 points). The results of latent class analysis showed that patients with multiple risk factors account for a higher proportion in the high recurrence risk group, compared with the low recurrence risk group (<i>P</i> <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are differences in recurrence rates among PTCL patients with different HDAC levels and in distribution characteristics of risk factors between high recurrence risk and low recurrence risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":35777,"journal":{"name":"中国实验血液学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实验血液学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.03.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the distribution characteristics of prognostic factors affecting recurrence in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients with different levels of histone deacetylase (HDAC) based on latent class analysis.

Methods: 112 PTCL patients who were treated in our hospital from September 2012 to September 2019 were selected and divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group. The clinical data of the two groups of patients were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for recurrence. Latent class analysis was used to compare the distribution characteristics of prognostic factors affecting recurrence between the high-risk group and the low-risk group.

Results: There were 87 patients (77.68%) in recurrence group and 25 patients (22.32%) in non-recurrence group. The result of multivariate logistic regression showed that ECOG score ≥2, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, IPI score >2, bone marrow involvement, elevated serum β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), short-term efficacy not reaching complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR), and the high expression of HDAC were all independent risk factors for recurrence in patients with PTCL (P <0.05). The recurrence rate of patients with high HDAC levels was significantly higher than that of patiens with low HDAC levels (P <0.05). The results of cluster analysis showed that the risk of recurrence was obviously clustered, and the patients could be divided into high recurrence risk group (HDAC>5 points) and low recurrence risk group (HDAC≤5 points). The results of latent class analysis showed that patients with multiple risk factors account for a higher proportion in the high recurrence risk group, compared with the low recurrence risk group (P <0.05).

Conclusion: There are differences in recurrence rates among PTCL patients with different HDAC levels and in distribution characteristics of risk factors between high recurrence risk and low recurrence risk groups.

[影响不同 HDAC 水平外周 T 细胞淋巴瘤患者复发的预后因素]
目的方法:选取2012年9月-2019年9月在我院接受治疗的112例PTCL患者为研究对象,将其分为复发组和非复发组。比较两组患者的临床数据。采用多变量逻辑回归分析复发的风险因素。采用潜类分析比较高危组和低危组影响复发的预后因素的分布特征:复发组有 87 名患者(77.68%),未复发组有 25 名患者(22.32%)。多变量逻辑回归结果显示,ECOG评分≥2分、Ann Arbor分期Ⅲ-Ⅳ期、IPI评分>2分、骨髓受累、血清β2-微球蛋白(β2-MG)升高、短期疗效未达到完全缓解(CR)或部分缓解(PR)、HDAC高表达均为PTCL患者复发的独立危险因素(P P P P 结论:PTCL患者复发率在不同组间存在差异:不同 HDAC 水平的 PTCL 患者的复发率存在差异,高复发风险组和低复发风险组之间的风险因素分布特征也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国实验血液学杂志
中国实验血液学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7331
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信