Every minute counts: A comparison of thawing times and haemostatic quality of plasma thawed at 37°C and 45°C using four different methods.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1111/tme.13061
J McCullagh, C Booth, J Lancut, S Platton, P Richards, L Green
{"title":"Every minute counts: A comparison of thawing times and haemostatic quality of plasma thawed at 37°C and 45°C using four different methods.","authors":"J McCullagh, C Booth, J Lancut, S Platton, P Richards, L Green","doi":"10.1111/tme.13061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Having faster plasma thawing devices could be beneficial for transfusion services, as it may improve the rapid availability of thawed plasma for bleeding patients, and it might remove the need to have extended pre-thawed plasma: thus, reducing unnecessary plasma wastage.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The aims of this study were to assess (a) the thawing times and (b) in vitro haemostatic quality of thawed plasma using Barkey Plasmatherm V (PTV) at 37 and 45°C versus Barkey Plasmatherm Classic (PTC) at 37 and 45°C, Sarstedt Sahara-III Maxitherm (SS-III) at 37°C and Helmer Scientific Thermogenesis Thermoline (TT) at 37°C. Haemostatic quality was assessed using LG-Octaplas at three different time points: baseline (5 min), 24 and 120 h after thawing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thawing time (SD) of 2 and 4 units was significantly different between different thawers. PTV at 45°C was the fastest method for both 2 and 4 units (7.06 min [0.68], 9.6 min [0.87], respectively). SS-III at 37°C being the slowest method (24.69 min [2.09] and 27.18 min [4.4], respectively) (p = < 0.05). Baseline measurements for all assays showed no significant difference in the prothrombin time, fibrinogen, FII, FV, protein C activity or free protein S antigen between all methods tested. However, at baseline PTV (both 37°C and 45°C) had significantly higher levels of FVII, FVIII and FXI and shortened activated partial thromboplastin time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PTV was the quickest method at thawing plasma at both 37 and at 45°C. The haemostatic quality of plasma thawed at 45 versus 37°C was not impaired. Thawing frozen plasma at 45°C should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"304-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Having faster plasma thawing devices could be beneficial for transfusion services, as it may improve the rapid availability of thawed plasma for bleeding patients, and it might remove the need to have extended pre-thawed plasma: thus, reducing unnecessary plasma wastage.

Study design and methods: The aims of this study were to assess (a) the thawing times and (b) in vitro haemostatic quality of thawed plasma using Barkey Plasmatherm V (PTV) at 37 and 45°C versus Barkey Plasmatherm Classic (PTC) at 37 and 45°C, Sarstedt Sahara-III Maxitherm (SS-III) at 37°C and Helmer Scientific Thermogenesis Thermoline (TT) at 37°C. Haemostatic quality was assessed using LG-Octaplas at three different time points: baseline (5 min), 24 and 120 h after thawing.

Results: The thawing time (SD) of 2 and 4 units was significantly different between different thawers. PTV at 45°C was the fastest method for both 2 and 4 units (7.06 min [0.68], 9.6 min [0.87], respectively). SS-III at 37°C being the slowest method (24.69 min [2.09] and 27.18 min [4.4], respectively) (p = < 0.05). Baseline measurements for all assays showed no significant difference in the prothrombin time, fibrinogen, FII, FV, protein C activity or free protein S antigen between all methods tested. However, at baseline PTV (both 37°C and 45°C) had significantly higher levels of FVII, FVIII and FXI and shortened activated partial thromboplastin time.

Discussion: PTV was the quickest method at thawing plasma at both 37 and at 45°C. The haemostatic quality of plasma thawed at 45 versus 37°C was not impaired. Thawing frozen plasma at 45°C should be considered.

分秒必争:采用四种不同方法比较 37°C 和 45°C 解冻血浆的解冻时间和止血质量。
背景:拥有更快的血浆解冻设备可能对输血服务有益,因为它可以提高出血患者解冻血浆的快速可用性,而且可以消除延长预解冻血浆时间的需要:从而减少不必要的血浆浪费:本研究的目的是评估(a)解冻时间和(b)解冻血浆的体外止血质量,使用温度为 37 和 45°C 的 Barkey Plasmatherm V (PTV) 与温度为 37 和 45°C 的 Barkey Plasmatherm Classic (PTC)、温度为 37°C 的 Sarstedt Sahara-III Maxitherm (SS-III) 和温度为 37°C 的 Helmer Scientific Thermogenesis Thermoline (TT)进行比较。使用 LG-Octaplas 在三个不同时间点评估止血质量:解冻后基线(5 分钟)、24 小时和 120 小时:结果:不同解冻器解冻 2 个和 4 个单位的时间(SD)有显著差异。45°C下的PTV是解冻2个和4个单位最快的方法(分别为7.06分钟[0.68]和9.6分钟[0.87])。37°C 下的 SS-III 是最慢的方法(分别为 24.69 分钟 [2.09] 和 27.18 分钟 [4.4])(p = 讨论):PTV 是在 37 和 45°C 解冻血浆的最快方法。45°C 和 37°C 解冻血浆的止血质量没有受到影响。应考虑在 45°C 解冻冰冻血浆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology. In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信