How do models of integrated primary care work? A proposed model for mechanisms of change using primary care behavioral health.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1037/ser0000871
Jennifer S Funderburk, Laura O Wray, Jessica Martin, Stephen A Maisto
{"title":"How do models of integrated primary care work? A proposed model for mechanisms of change using primary care behavioral health.","authors":"Jennifer S Funderburk, Laura O Wray, Jessica Martin, Stephen A Maisto","doi":"10.1037/ser0000871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Embedding a behavioral health consultant (BHC) into primary care settings is a common way to address the challenge of providing mental health services to primary care patients. Systematic research on the mechanisms of change that underlie the relationship between the active components of these integrated models of care delivery on patient outcomes is needed to help maximize effectiveness and, in turn, guide future implementation efforts. Using the existing primary care behavioral health (PCBH) literature, this article provides a conceptual framework using a common presenting problem, depression and identifies the active ingredients of PCBH and hypothesized mechanisms of patient change that result in decreased depressive symptoms and improved functioning within a patient. Eight hypothesized mechanisms (i.e., belief that PCBH services provided by BHC is a standard part of care within primary care; increased credibility of BHC and PCBH care provided; increased receptivity to the PCBH services offered; increased understanding of problem and options; realignment of patient expectations for care; increased readiness to change; decrease stigma; increase capacity to cope and manage symptoms) are proposed within this conceptual framework along with four potential mediators/moderators (i.e., team processes, PCBH factors, common factors, treatment engagement). The theoretical conceptualization included calls for future research to provide an evidence base to inform clinical practice. An increased understanding of the relationship between these active ingredients and the identified mechanisms of change is essential to maximize PCBH's effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Embedding a behavioral health consultant (BHC) into primary care settings is a common way to address the challenge of providing mental health services to primary care patients. Systematic research on the mechanisms of change that underlie the relationship between the active components of these integrated models of care delivery on patient outcomes is needed to help maximize effectiveness and, in turn, guide future implementation efforts. Using the existing primary care behavioral health (PCBH) literature, this article provides a conceptual framework using a common presenting problem, depression and identifies the active ingredients of PCBH and hypothesized mechanisms of patient change that result in decreased depressive symptoms and improved functioning within a patient. Eight hypothesized mechanisms (i.e., belief that PCBH services provided by BHC is a standard part of care within primary care; increased credibility of BHC and PCBH care provided; increased receptivity to the PCBH services offered; increased understanding of problem and options; realignment of patient expectations for care; increased readiness to change; decrease stigma; increase capacity to cope and manage symptoms) are proposed within this conceptual framework along with four potential mediators/moderators (i.e., team processes, PCBH factors, common factors, treatment engagement). The theoretical conceptualization included calls for future research to provide an evidence base to inform clinical practice. An increased understanding of the relationship between these active ingredients and the identified mechanisms of change is essential to maximize PCBH's effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

综合初级保健模式如何运作?利用初级保健行为健康改变机制的建议模式。
将行为健康顾问(BHC)纳入初级医疗机构是应对向初级医疗患者提供心理健康服务这一挑战的常用方法。我们需要系统地研究这些综合护理模式的积极组成部分与患者预后之间的关系,以帮助最大限度地提高效率,并反过来指导未来的实施工作。本文利用现有的初级保健行为健康(PCBH)文献,以常见的问题--抑郁症为切入点,提供了一个概念框架,并确定了 PCBH 的有效成分,以及导致抑郁症状减轻和患者功能改善的患者变化假设机制。在这一概念框架内提出了八种假设机制(即认为由 BHC 提供的 PCBH 服务是初级保健的标准护理部分;提高 BHC 和所提供的 PCBH 护理的可信度;提高对所提供的 PCBH 服务的接受度;提高对问题和选择的理解;调整患者对护理的期望;提高改变的意愿;减少耻辱感;提高应对和管理症状的能力)以及四种潜在的中介/调节因素(即团队流程、PCBH 因素、共同因素、治疗参与)。该理论概念包括呼吁未来的研究为临床实践提供证据基础。进一步了解这些有效成分与已确定的改变机制之间的关系,对于最大限度地提高 PCBH 的有效性至关重要。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信