Maximilian Gram, Martin Christa, Fabian Tobias Gutjahr, Petra Albertova, Tatjana Williams, Peter Michael Jakob, Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer, Peter Nordbeck
{"title":"Quantification of the rotating frame relaxation time T<sub>2ρ</sub>: Comparison of balanced spin-lock and continuous-wave Malcolm-Levitt preparations.","authors":"Maximilian Gram, Martin Christa, Fabian Tobias Gutjahr, Petra Albertova, Tatjana Williams, Peter Michael Jakob, Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer, Peter Nordbeck","doi":"10.1002/nbm.5199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For the quantification of rotating frame relaxation times, the T<sub>2ρ</sub> relaxation pathway plays an essential role. Nevertheless, T<sub>2ρ</sub> imaging has been studied only to a small extent compared with T<sub>1ρ</sub>, and preparation techniques for T<sub>2ρ</sub> have so far been adapted from T<sub>1ρ</sub> methods. In this work, two different preparation concepts are compared specifically for the use of T<sub>2ρ</sub> mapping. The first approach involves transferring the balanced spin-locking (B-SL) concept of T<sub>1ρ</sub> imaging. The second and newly proposed approach is a continuous-wave Malcolm-Levitt (CW-MLEV) pulse train with zero echo times and was motivated from T<sub>2</sub> preparation strategies. The modules are tested in Bloch simulations for their intrinsic sensitivity to field inhomogeneities and validated in phantom experiments. In addition, myocardial T<sub>2ρ</sub> mapping was performed in mice as an exemplary application. Our results demonstrate that the CW-MLEV approach provides superior robustness and thus suggest that established methods of T<sub>1ρ</sub> imaging are not best suited for T<sub>2ρ</sub> experiments. In the presence of field inhomogeneities, the simulations indicated an increased banding compensation by a factor of 4.1 compared with B-SL. Quantification of left ventricular T<sub>2ρ</sub> time in mice yielded more consistent results, and values in the range of 59.2-61.1 ms (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.986-0.992) were observed at 7 T.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"e5199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For the quantification of rotating frame relaxation times, the T2ρ relaxation pathway plays an essential role. Nevertheless, T2ρ imaging has been studied only to a small extent compared with T1ρ, and preparation techniques for T2ρ have so far been adapted from T1ρ methods. In this work, two different preparation concepts are compared specifically for the use of T2ρ mapping. The first approach involves transferring the balanced spin-locking (B-SL) concept of T1ρ imaging. The second and newly proposed approach is a continuous-wave Malcolm-Levitt (CW-MLEV) pulse train with zero echo times and was motivated from T2 preparation strategies. The modules are tested in Bloch simulations for their intrinsic sensitivity to field inhomogeneities and validated in phantom experiments. In addition, myocardial T2ρ mapping was performed in mice as an exemplary application. Our results demonstrate that the CW-MLEV approach provides superior robustness and thus suggest that established methods of T1ρ imaging are not best suited for T2ρ experiments. In the presence of field inhomogeneities, the simulations indicated an increased banding compensation by a factor of 4.1 compared with B-SL. Quantification of left ventricular T2ρ time in mice yielded more consistent results, and values in the range of 59.2-61.1 ms (R2 = 0.986-0.992) were observed at 7 T.
期刊介绍:
NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.