Psychosocial burden in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms with and without pathologic acid reflux.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14852
Kelli Liu, Amanda J Krause, Madeline Greytak, Tiffany Taft, Erin Walsh, Rena Yadlapati
{"title":"Psychosocial burden in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms with and without pathologic acid reflux.","authors":"Kelli Liu, Amanda J Krause, Madeline Greytak, Tiffany Taft, Erin Walsh, Rena Yadlapati","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms, with or without pathologic reflux, frequently have poor response to standard therapies, which may be a result of overlapping cognitive-affective processes. Therefore, the aims of this study included measuring psychosocial distress and laryngeal-specific cognitive distress in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) as well as comparing these among laryngeal symptomatic patients with and without conclusive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center study enrolled adults with chronic LPS from 9/22 to 6/23. Patients completed eight questionnaires on quality of life, symptom burden, and psychosocial distress. The laryngeal cognitive affective tool (LCAT) assessed laryngeal-specific hypervigilance and anxiety; LCAT scores ≥33 were elevated. All patients underwent objective testing with endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring and were categorized as proven GERD (GER+) or no proven GERD (GER-).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>One hundred twenty-nine patients were included: 66% female, mean age 54.1 (17.5) years, mean BMI 27.6 (6.8) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 66% Caucasian, 57% with an elevated LCAT, and 53% GER+. Moderate-to-severe anxiety was found in 39% and moderate-to-severe depression in 19%. An elevated LCAT alone or with an elevated anxiety/depression score was found in 58%. Patient-reported outcomes scores, including LCAT scores (32.9 (13.8) GER- vs. 33.1 (12.6) GER+, p = 0.91), were similar between patients with and without GER+.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>Patients with chronic LPS experience heightened levels of hypervigilance, symptom-specific anxiety, and psychosocial distress, regardless of the presence of pathologic GER.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms, with or without pathologic reflux, frequently have poor response to standard therapies, which may be a result of overlapping cognitive-affective processes. Therefore, the aims of this study included measuring psychosocial distress and laryngeal-specific cognitive distress in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) as well as comparing these among laryngeal symptomatic patients with and without conclusive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods: This prospective, single-center study enrolled adults with chronic LPS from 9/22 to 6/23. Patients completed eight questionnaires on quality of life, symptom burden, and psychosocial distress. The laryngeal cognitive affective tool (LCAT) assessed laryngeal-specific hypervigilance and anxiety; LCAT scores ≥33 were elevated. All patients underwent objective testing with endoscopy and/or ambulatory reflux monitoring and were categorized as proven GERD (GER+) or no proven GERD (GER-).

Key results: One hundred twenty-nine patients were included: 66% female, mean age 54.1 (17.5) years, mean BMI 27.6 (6.8) kg/m2, 66% Caucasian, 57% with an elevated LCAT, and 53% GER+. Moderate-to-severe anxiety was found in 39% and moderate-to-severe depression in 19%. An elevated LCAT alone or with an elevated anxiety/depression score was found in 58%. Patient-reported outcomes scores, including LCAT scores (32.9 (13.8) GER- vs. 33.1 (12.6) GER+, p = 0.91), were similar between patients with and without GER+.

Conclusions and inferences: Patients with chronic LPS experience heightened levels of hypervigilance, symptom-specific anxiety, and psychosocial distress, regardless of the presence of pathologic GER.

伴有或不伴有病理性反酸的慢性喉咽症状患者的社会心理负担。
背景:无论是否存在病理性反流,慢性喉咽部症状患者经常对标准疗法反应不佳,这可能是认知-情感过程重叠的结果。因此,本研究的目的包括测量慢性喉咽症状(LPS)患者的社会心理压力和喉部特异性认知压力,以及比较有和没有确诊胃食管反流病(GERD)的喉部症状患者的这些压力:这项前瞻性的单中心研究在 9/22 年至 6/23 年期间招募了患有慢性 LPS 的成人患者。患者填写了八份关于生活质量、症状负担和社会心理困扰的问卷。喉认知情感工具(LCAT)可评估喉特异性过度警觉和焦虑;LCAT评分≥33分者为升高。所有患者都接受了内窥镜和/或流动反流监测的客观检测,并被分为已证实的胃食管反流症(GER+)或未证实的胃食管反流症(GER-):主要结果:共纳入 129 名患者:66%的患者为女性,平均年龄为 54.1 (17.5) 岁,平均体重指数为 27.6 (6.8) kg/m2,66%为白种人,57%的患者 LCAT 升高,53% 为 GER+。其中 39% 患有中度至重度焦虑症,19% 患有中度至重度抑郁症。58% 的患者仅有 LCAT 升高或伴有焦虑/抑郁评分升高。患者报告的结果评分,包括 LCAT 评分(32.9 (13.8) GER- vs. 33.1 (12.6) GER+,p = 0.91),在有 GER+ 和没有 GER+ 的患者之间相似:结论和推论:无论是否存在病理性胃食管反流,慢性 LPS 患者的过度警觉、症状特异性焦虑和社会心理压力都会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信