Validation of prediction model for successful discontinuation of continuous renal replacement therapy: a multicenter cohort study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.23876/j.krcp.23.308
Junseok Jeon, Eun Jeong Ko, Hyejeong Park, Song In Baeg, Hyung Duk Kim, Ji-Won Min, Eun Sil Koh, Kyungho Lee, Danbee Kang, Juhee Cho, Jung Eun Lee, Wooseong Huh, Byung Ha Chung, Hye Ryoun Jang
{"title":"Validation of prediction model for successful discontinuation of continuous renal replacement therapy: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Junseok Jeon, Eun Jeong Ko, Hyejeong Park, Song In Baeg, Hyung Duk Kim, Ji-Won Min, Eun Sil Koh, Kyungho Lee, Danbee Kang, Juhee Cho, Jung Eun Lee, Wooseong Huh, Byung Ha Chung, Hye Ryoun Jang","doi":"10.23876/j.krcp.23.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become the standard modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients. However, consensus is lacking regarding the criteria for discontinuing CRRT. Here we validated the usefulness of the prediction model for successful discontinuation of CRRT in a multicenter retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One temporal cohort and four external cohorts included 1,517 patients with acute kidney injury who underwent CRRT for >2 days from 2018 to 2020. The model was composed of four variables: urine output, blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium, and mean arterial pressure. Successful discontinuation of CRRT was defined as the absence of an RRT requirement for 7 days thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.76). The probabilities of successful discontinuation were approximately 17%, 35%, and 70% in the low-score, intermediate-score, and highscore groups, respectively. The model performance was good in four cohorts (AUROC, 0.73-0.75) but poor in one cohort (AUROC, 0.56). In one cohort with poor performance, attending physicians primarily controlled CRRT prescription and discontinuation, while in the other four cohorts, nephrologists determined all important steps in CRRT operation, including screening for CRRT discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall performance of our prediction model using four simple variables for successful discontinuation of CRRT was good, except for one cohort where nephrologists did not actively engage in CRRT operation. These results suggest the need for active engagement of nephrologists and protocolized management for CRRT discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17716,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"528-537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.23.308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become the standard modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients. However, consensus is lacking regarding the criteria for discontinuing CRRT. Here we validated the usefulness of the prediction model for successful discontinuation of CRRT in a multicenter retrospective cohort.

Methods: One temporal cohort and four external cohorts included 1,517 patients with acute kidney injury who underwent CRRT for >2 days from 2018 to 2020. The model was composed of four variables: urine output, blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium, and mean arterial pressure. Successful discontinuation of CRRT was defined as the absence of an RRT requirement for 7 days thereafter.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.76). The probabilities of successful discontinuation were approximately 17%, 35%, and 70% in the low-score, intermediate-score, and highscore groups, respectively. The model performance was good in four cohorts (AUROC, 0.73-0.75) but poor in one cohort (AUROC, 0.56). In one cohort with poor performance, attending physicians primarily controlled CRRT prescription and discontinuation, while in the other four cohorts, nephrologists determined all important steps in CRRT operation, including screening for CRRT discontinuation.

Conclusion: The overall performance of our prediction model using four simple variables for successful discontinuation of CRRT was good, except for one cohort where nephrologists did not actively engage in CRRT operation. These results suggest the need for active engagement of nephrologists and protocolized management for CRRT discontinuation.

验证成功停用持续肾脏替代疗法的预测模型:一项多中心队列研究。
背景:连续性肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)已成为重症患者肾脏替代疗法(RRT)的标准模式。然而,关于停用 CRRT 的标准尚未达成共识。在此,我们在一个多中心回顾性队列中验证了成功中止 CRRT 预测模型的实用性:一个时间队列和四个外部队列纳入了 1517 名急性肾损伤患者,这些患者在 2018 年至 2020 年期间接受了 CRRT 治疗,治疗时间大于 2 天。模型由四个变量组成:尿量、血尿素氮、血清钾和平均动脉压。CRRT的成功停用定义为此后7天内无RRT需求:接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为 0.74(95% 置信区间,0.71-0.76)。低分、中分和高分组成功停药的概率分别约为 17%、35% 和 70%。四个队列的模型性能良好(AUROC,0.73-0.75),但有一个队列的模型性能较差(AUROC,0.56)。在一个性能较差的队列中,主治医师主要控制 CRRT 的处方和停药,而在其他四个队列中,肾科医师决定 CRRT 操作的所有重要步骤,包括 CRRT 停药筛查:结论:我们使用四个简单变量建立的 CRRT 成功停药预测模型总体表现良好,但有一个队列除外,在该队列中,肾病专家并未积极参与 CRRT 操作。这些结果表明,肾病专家需要积极参与,并对 CRRT 的停用进行规范化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (formerly The Korean Journal of Nephrology; ISSN 1975-9460, launched in 1982), the official journal of the Korean Society of Nephrology, is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English. Its ISO abbreviation is Kidney Res Clin Pract. To provide an efficient venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to basic renal science and clinical practice, the journal offers open access (free submission and free access) and considers articles on all aspects of clinical nephrology and hypertension as well as related molecular genetics, anatomy, pathology, physiology, pharmacology, and immunology. In particular, the journal focuses on translational renal research that helps bridging laboratory discovery with the diagnosis and treatment of human kidney disease. Topics covered include basic science with possible clinical applicability and papers on the pathophysiological basis of disease processes of the kidney. Original researches from areas of intervention nephrology or dialysis access are also welcomed. Major article types considered for publication include original research and reviews on current topics of interest. Accepted manuscripts are granted free online open-access immediately after publication, which permits its users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles to facilitate access to a broad readership. Circulation number of print copies is 1,600.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信