Can Machine Learning Models Based on Computed Tomography Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics Provide Diagnostic Value for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ruilong Zong, Xijuan Ma, Yibing Shi, Li Geng
{"title":"Can Machine Learning Models Based on Computed Tomography Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics Provide Diagnostic Value for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer?","authors":"Ruilong Zong, Xijuan Ma, Yibing Shi, Li Geng","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore whether machine learning model based on computed tomography (CT) radiomics and clinical characteristics can differentiate Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) from non-EBVaGC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contrast-enhanced CT images were collected from 158 patients with GC (46 EBV-positive, 112 EBV-negative) between April 2018 and February 2023. Radiomics features were extracted from the volumes of interest. A radiomics signature was built based on radiomics features by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression algorithm. Multivariate analyses were used to identify significant clinicoradiological variables. We developed 6 ML models for EBVaGC, including logistic regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting, random forest (RF), support vector machine, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and K-nearest neighbor algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the area under the precision-recall curves (AP), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis were applied to assess the effectiveness of each model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six ML models achieved AUC of 0.706-0.854 and AP of 0.480-0.793 for predicting EBV status in GC. With an AUC of 0.854 and an AP of 0.793, the RF model performed the best. The forest plot of the AUC score revealed that the RF model had the most stable performance, with a standard deviation of 0.003 for AUC score. RF also performed well in the testing dataset, with an AUC of 0.832 (95% confidence interval: 0.679-0.951), accuracy of 0.833, sensitivity of 0.857, and specificity of 0.824, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RF model based on clinical variables and Rad_score can serve as a noninvasive tool to evaluate the EBV status of gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore whether machine learning model based on computed tomography (CT) radiomics and clinical characteristics can differentiate Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) from non-EBVaGC.

Methods: Contrast-enhanced CT images were collected from 158 patients with GC (46 EBV-positive, 112 EBV-negative) between April 2018 and February 2023. Radiomics features were extracted from the volumes of interest. A radiomics signature was built based on radiomics features by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression algorithm. Multivariate analyses were used to identify significant clinicoradiological variables. We developed 6 ML models for EBVaGC, including logistic regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting, random forest (RF), support vector machine, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and K-nearest neighbor algorithm. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the area under the precision-recall curves (AP), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis were applied to assess the effectiveness of each model.

Results: Six ML models achieved AUC of 0.706-0.854 and AP of 0.480-0.793 for predicting EBV status in GC. With an AUC of 0.854 and an AP of 0.793, the RF model performed the best. The forest plot of the AUC score revealed that the RF model had the most stable performance, with a standard deviation of 0.003 for AUC score. RF also performed well in the testing dataset, with an AUC of 0.832 (95% confidence interval: 0.679-0.951), accuracy of 0.833, sensitivity of 0.857, and specificity of 0.824, respectively.

Conclusions: The RF model based on clinical variables and Rad_score can serve as a noninvasive tool to evaluate the EBV status of gastric cancer.

基于计算机断层扫描放射组学和临床特征的机器学习模型能否为 Epstein-Barr 病毒相关性胃癌提供诊断价值?
研究目的本研究旨在探讨基于计算机断层扫描(CT)放射组学和临床特征的机器学习模型能否区分爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒相关性胃癌(EBVaGC)和非EBVaGC:收集了2018年4月至2023年2月期间158例胃癌患者(46例EBV阳性,112例EBV阴性)的对比增强CT图像。从感兴趣的体积中提取放射组学特征。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子逻辑回归算法,根据放射组学特征建立放射组学特征。多变量分析用于确定重要的临床放射学变量。我们为EBVaGC开发了6种ML模型,包括逻辑回归、极梯度提升、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机、高斯直觉贝叶斯和K近邻算法。应用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、精确度-召回曲线下面积(AP)、校准图和决策曲线分析来评估每个模型的有效性:六个 ML 模型预测 GC 中 EBV 状态的 AUC 为 0.706-0.854,AP 为 0.480-0.793。RF模型的AUC为0.854,AP为0.793,表现最佳。AUC得分的森林图显示,RF模型的性能最稳定,AUC得分的标准偏差为0.003。RF 在测试数据集中也表现良好,AUC 为 0.832(95% 置信区间:0.679-0.951),准确率为 0.833,灵敏度为 0.857,特异性为 0.824:基于临床变量和 Rad_score 的 RF 模型可作为评估胃癌 EBV 状态的无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信