Assessment of Perception of Pain with E-Speed Film, CCD Sensor and Photostimulable Phosphor Plates for Intraoral Radiographs in Children using Three Pain Rating Scales.

Q3 Dentistry
Indian Journal of Dental Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_78_23
Suruchi Juneja, Shital Dalvi, Rajni Aggarwal, Manish Sukhija, Sohajpreet Singh, Shaveta Bansal
{"title":"Assessment of Perception of Pain with E-Speed Film, CCD Sensor and Photostimulable Phosphor Plates for Intraoral Radiographs in Children using Three Pain Rating Scales.","authors":"Suruchi Juneja, Shital Dalvi, Rajni Aggarwal, Manish Sukhija, Sohajpreet Singh, Shaveta Bansal","doi":"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_78_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental radiography is an integral part of intraoral evaluation. Children are often uncomfortable during the placement of film or sensor due to the impingement of the soft tissues. Thus, the perception of pain with three intraoral radiographic methods in children was evaluated using three subjective pain rating scales.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the discomfort with three different techniques, that is, intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiograph, charge-coupled device (CCD), and photostimulable phosphor (PSP) luminescence (PSPL), using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS), numerical rating scale, and visual analog scale (VAS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A sample of 35 children aged 6-12 years were divided into two groups: group 1 (6-8 years) and group 2 (9-12 years). For each child, simulations of the three radiological methods (IOPA, CCD, and PSPL) were performed. The meaning of each facial expression on the WBFPRS, VAS, and the numbers on the numerical rating scale was explained to each child before the procedure.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and paired-samples t-test are used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the CCD sensors elicited higher pain scores than those obtained with IOPA and PSPL, whereas the IOPA film showed the least pain score. Higher score values were obtained in group 1 than in group 2, indicating that children aged 6-8 years felt higher discomfort than the 9- to 12-year age group for the same procedure. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was concluded that conventional IOPA films were tolerated better by children when compared to PSP plates and CCD sensors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13311,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_78_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dental radiography is an integral part of intraoral evaluation. Children are often uncomfortable during the placement of film or sensor due to the impingement of the soft tissues. Thus, the perception of pain with three intraoral radiographic methods in children was evaluated using three subjective pain rating scales.

Aim: To evaluate the discomfort with three different techniques, that is, intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiograph, charge-coupled device (CCD), and photostimulable phosphor (PSP) luminescence (PSPL), using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS), numerical rating scale, and visual analog scale (VAS).

Materials and methods: A sample of 35 children aged 6-12 years were divided into two groups: group 1 (6-8 years) and group 2 (9-12 years). For each child, simulations of the three radiological methods (IOPA, CCD, and PSPL) were performed. The meaning of each facial expression on the WBFPRS, VAS, and the numbers on the numerical rating scale was explained to each child before the procedure.

Statistical analysis used: A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and paired-samples t-test are used.

Results: The results revealed that the CCD sensors elicited higher pain scores than those obtained with IOPA and PSPL, whereas the IOPA film showed the least pain score. Higher score values were obtained in group 1 than in group 2, indicating that children aged 6-8 years felt higher discomfort than the 9- to 12-year age group for the same procedure. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: It was concluded that conventional IOPA films were tolerated better by children when compared to PSP plates and CCD sensors.

使用三种疼痛评定量表评估儿童口内射线照相术中使用电子速度胶片、CCD 传感器和光刺激荧光板时的疼痛感。
背景:牙科放射摄影是口内评估不可或缺的一部分。在放置胶片或传感器时,由于软组织受到撞击,儿童往往会感到不适。目的:使用Wong-Baker面部疼痛评分量表(WBFPRS)、数字评分量表和视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)对口腔根尖周(IOPA)X光片、电荷耦合装置(CCD)和光刺激荧光粉(PSP)发光(PSPL)这三种不同技术的不适感进行评估:将 35 名 6-12 岁儿童分为两组:第一组(6-8 岁)和第二组(9-12 岁)。对每个儿童都进行了三种放射学方法(IOPA、CCD 和 PSPL)的模拟。手术前向每个儿童解释了 WBFPRS、VAS 和数字评分量表中每个面部表情的含义:采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验和配对样本 t 检验:结果显示,CCD 传感器的疼痛评分高于 IOPA 和 PSPL,而 IOPA 胶片的疼痛评分最低。第 1 组比第 2 组获得的分值更高,这表明在相同的操作过程中,6-8 岁儿童比 9-12 岁年龄组的儿童感到更多不适。这一差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001):结论:与 PSP 板和 CCD 传感器相比,儿童对传统 IOPA 胶片的耐受性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Indian Journal of Dental Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Dental Research (IJDR) is the official publication of the Indian Society for Dental Research (ISDR), India section of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), published quarterly. IJDR publishes scientific papers on well designed and controlled original research involving orodental sciences. Papers may also include reports on unusual and interesting case presentations and invited review papers on significant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信