Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08529-z
Yuanhao Su, Yongke Wu, Cheng Li, Yiyuan Zhao, Yunhao Li, Xing Jin, Zhidong Wang
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuanhao Su, Yongke Wu, Cheng Li, Yiyuan Zhao, Yunhao Li, Xing Jin, Zhidong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08529-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>As global life expectancy rises and gastrointestinal tumor incidence increases, more elderly patients are undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for tumor treatment. The current situation highlights the importance of sarcopenia assessment before ESD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess sarcopenia's role in predicting post-ESD adverse outcomes in the elderly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing ESD treatment. A comprehensive search was conducted across three databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science). We were using NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA ASSESSMENT SCALE for risk of bias assessment. The data were synthesized using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 reports were identified, analyzing 7 indicators, with a combined sample size of 6044. Through a series of analyses, we have derived several highly credible research findings: the overall OR and 95% CI for gastric and colorectal post-ESD perforation between sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups were 1.34 [0.92, 1.97], for CTCAE grade > 2 was 2.65 [1.45, 4.82], for upper gastrointestinal post-ESD pneumonia were 1.97 [1.30, 2.99], and for gastric post-ESD mortality within 5 years were 2.96 [1.33, 6.58].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sarcopenia is a risk factor for increased incidence of complications (CTCAE > 2) after undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD, increased pneumonia rates, and higher mortality rates within five years following gastric ESD treatment in elderly patients. However, sarcopenia does not lead to an increased perforation rate in elderly patients undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD treatments. Registration and protocol: The protocol for this study was registered on the Open Science Framework in 2024 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7B2CZ . We also conducted pre-registration on PROSPERO (CRD42024532547).</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08529-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: As global life expectancy rises and gastrointestinal tumor incidence increases, more elderly patients are undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for tumor treatment. The current situation highlights the importance of sarcopenia assessment before ESD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess sarcopenia's role in predicting post-ESD adverse outcomes in the elderly.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing ESD treatment. A comprehensive search was conducted across three databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science). We were using NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA ASSESSMENT SCALE for risk of bias assessment. The data were synthesized using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: A total of 9 reports were identified, analyzing 7 indicators, with a combined sample size of 6044. Through a series of analyses, we have derived several highly credible research findings: the overall OR and 95% CI for gastric and colorectal post-ESD perforation between sarcopenia and nonsarcopenia groups were 1.34 [0.92, 1.97], for CTCAE grade > 2 was 2.65 [1.45, 4.82], for upper gastrointestinal post-ESD pneumonia were 1.97 [1.30, 2.99], and for gastric post-ESD mortality within 5 years were 2.96 [1.33, 6.58].

Conclusions: Sarcopenia is a risk factor for increased incidence of complications (CTCAE > 2) after undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD, increased pneumonia rates, and higher mortality rates within five years following gastric ESD treatment in elderly patients. However, sarcopenia does not lead to an increased perforation rate in elderly patients undergoing gastric and colorectal ESD treatments. Registration and protocol: The protocol for this study was registered on the Open Science Framework in 2024 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7B2CZ . We also conducted pre-registration on PROSPERO (CRD42024532547).

Abstract Image

内镜粘膜下剥离术老年患者 "肌少症 "的临床意义:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景和目的:随着全球人均寿命的延长和胃肠道肿瘤发病率的增加,越来越多的老年患者接受内镜粘膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗肿瘤。目前的情况凸显了在进行 ESD 之前对肌肉疏松症进行评估的重要性。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估肌肉疏松症在预测老年人ESD术后不良预后中的作用:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以研究肌肉疏松症对接受 ESD 治疗的老年患者预后的影响。我们对三个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science)进行了全面检索。我们使用 NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA ASSESSMENT SCALE 评估偏倚风险。我们使用 Review Manager 5.3 对数据进行了综合:共发现 9 篇报告,分析了 7 项指标,样本量合计 6044 个。通过一系列分析,我们得出了几项可信度很高的研究结果:在肌肉疏松症组和非肌肉疏松症组之间,胃和结肠直肠ESD术后穿孔的总体OR值和95% CI值分别为1.34 [0.92,1.97],CTCAE>2级为2.65 [1.45,4.82],上消化道ESD后肺炎为1.97 [1.30,2.99],胃ESD后5年内死亡率为2.96 [1.33,6.58]:肌肉疏松症是导致老年患者接受胃部和结直肠ESD治疗后并发症(CTCAE>2)发生率增加、肺炎发生率增加以及胃部ESD治疗后五年内死亡率增加的风险因素。不过,在接受胃和结肠直肠ESD治疗的老年患者中,肌肉疏松症并不会导致穿孔率增加。注册和方案:本研究的方案已于 2024 年在开放科学框架(Open Science Framework)上注册 https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7B2CZ 。我们还在 PROSPERO(CRD42024532547)上进行了预注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信