Long Nguyen-Hoang, Linh Thuy Dinh, Angela S T Tai, Duy-Anh Nguyen, Ritsuko K Pooh, Arihiro Shiozaki, Mingming Zheng, Yali Hu, Bin Li, Aditya Kusuma, Piengbulan Yapan, Arundhati Gosavi, Mayumi Kaneko, Suchaya Luewan, Tung-Yao Chang, Noppadol Chaiyasit, Tongta Nanthakomon, Huishu Liu, Steven W Shaw, Wing Cheong Leung, Zaleha Abdullah Mahdy, Angela Aguilar, Hillary H Y Leung, Nikki M W Lee, So Ling Lau, Isabella Y M Wah, Xiaohong Lu, Daljit S Sahota, Marc K C Chong, Liona C Poon
{"title":"Implementation of First-Trimester Screening and Prevention of Preeclampsia: A Stepped Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial in Asia.","authors":"Long Nguyen-Hoang, Linh Thuy Dinh, Angela S T Tai, Duy-Anh Nguyen, Ritsuko K Pooh, Arihiro Shiozaki, Mingming Zheng, Yali Hu, Bin Li, Aditya Kusuma, Piengbulan Yapan, Arundhati Gosavi, Mayumi Kaneko, Suchaya Luewan, Tung-Yao Chang, Noppadol Chaiyasit, Tongta Nanthakomon, Huishu Liu, Steven W Shaw, Wing Cheong Leung, Zaleha Abdullah Mahdy, Angela Aguilar, Hillary H Y Leung, Nikki M W Lee, So Ling Lau, Isabella Y M Wah, Xiaohong Lu, Daljit S Sahota, Marc K C Chong, Liona C Poon","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a first-trimester screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia in Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, this multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At regular 6-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transit from nonintervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women underwent first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia using a Bayes theorem-based triple-test. High-risk women, with adjusted risk for preterm preeclampsia ≥1 in 100, received low-dose aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 88.04% (42 897 of 48 725) of women agreed to undergo first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia. Among those identified as high-risk in the intervention phase, 82.39% (2919 of 3543) received aspirin prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia between the intervention and non-intervention phases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 0.91-2.77]). However, among high-risk women in the intervention phase, aspirin prophylaxis was significantly associated with a 41% reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.37-0.92]). In addition, it correlated with 54%, 55%, and 64% reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia with delivery at <34 weeks (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.93]), spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.22-0.92]), and perinatal death (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.91]), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of aspirin-related severe adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia. However, low-dose aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia by 41% among high-risk women. The screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is highly accepted by a diverse group of women from various ethnic backgrounds beyond the original population where the strategy was developed. These findings underpin the importance of the widespread implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia on a global scale.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03941886.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This trial aimed to assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of a first-trimester screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia in Asia.
Methods: Between August 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, this multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial included maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia. The trial started with a period where all recruiting centers provided routine antenatal care without study-related intervention. At regular 6-week intervals, one cluster was randomized to transit from nonintervention phase to intervention phase. In the intervention phase, women underwent first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia using a Bayes theorem-based triple-test. High-risk women, with adjusted risk for preterm preeclampsia ≥1 in 100, received low-dose aspirin from <16 weeks until 36 weeks.
Results: Overall, 88.04% (42 897 of 48 725) of women agreed to undergo first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia. Among those identified as high-risk in the intervention phase, 82.39% (2919 of 3543) received aspirin prophylaxis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia between the intervention and non-intervention phases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59 [95% CI, 0.91-2.77]). However, among high-risk women in the intervention phase, aspirin prophylaxis was significantly associated with a 41% reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.37-0.92]). In addition, it correlated with 54%, 55%, and 64% reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia with delivery at <34 weeks (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.23-0.93]), spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.22-0.92]), and perinatal death (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.91]), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of aspirin-related severe adverse events.
Conclusions: The implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is not associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia. However, low-dose aspirin effectively reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia by 41% among high-risk women. The screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia is highly accepted by a diverse group of women from various ethnic backgrounds beyond the original population where the strategy was developed. These findings underpin the importance of the widespread implementation of the screen-and-prevent strategy for preterm preeclampsia on a global scale.
背景:本试验旨在评估亚洲地区早产子痫前期(PE)孕前筛查和预防策略的有效性、可接受性和安全性:该试验旨在评估亚洲地区早产子痫前期(PE)首诊筛查预防策略的有效性、可接受性和安全性:在2019年8月1日至2022年2月28日期间,这项多中心阶梯楔形群组随机试验纳入了亚洲十个地区的产科/诊断单位。试验开始时,所有招募中心均提供常规产前护理,不进行与研究相关的干预。每隔六周,一个群组被随机从非干预阶段转入干预阶段。在干预阶段,妇女在一胎时使用基于贝叶斯定理的三重检测法进行早产儿 PE 筛查。结果显示,调整后早产 PE 风险≥ 1/100的高风险妇女接受了低剂量阿司匹林治疗:总体而言,88.04%(42,897/48,725)的妇女同意接受第一胎早产 PE 筛查。在干预阶段被确定为高风险的产妇中,82.39%(2919/3543 人)接受了阿司匹林预防治疗。干预阶段和非干预阶段的早产 PE 发生率无明显差异(调整后的几率比 [aOR] 1.59;95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.91 至 2.77)。然而,在干预阶段的高危妇女中,阿司匹林预防与早产 PE 发生率降低 41% 显著相关(aOR 0.59;95%CI 0.37 至 0.92)。此外,它还能使结论分娩时的 PE 发生率分别降低 54%、55% 和 64%:对早产 PE 实施筛查和预防策略与显著降低早产 PE 的发生率无关。然而,低剂量阿司匹林可有效降低高危产妇早产 PE 的发生率 41%。针对早产 PE 的筛查和预防策略得到了来自不同种族背景的妇女群体的高度认可,而不仅仅局限于最初制定该策略的人群。这些研究结果证明了在全球范围内广泛实施早产 PE 筛查和预防策略的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.