Pacemaker lead thrombosis - a rare cause of breathlessness.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Archive of clinical cases Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.22551/2024.43.1102.10288
Megan Ashleigh Kelly, Alexander Davidson, Kirsty Griffiths, Renzo Pessotto, Stephen James Leslie
{"title":"Pacemaker lead thrombosis - a rare cause of breathlessness.","authors":"Megan Ashleigh Kelly, Alexander Davidson, Kirsty Griffiths, Renzo Pessotto, Stephen James Leslie","doi":"10.22551/2024.43.1102.10288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the number of pacemaker insertions increases to manage numerous cardiac arrhythmias, the number of complications is also increasing as a result. More common complications such as infection and lead displacement are routinely discussed with patients before they undergo the procedure. However rare complications such as superior vena cava syndrome are not discussed during the consenting period. But they do occur, as seen in this case of a 69-year-old male. This fit and active man had a right-sided dual-chamber pacemaker inserted due to sinus node disease and presented 5 years later with symptoms suggestive of superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO). Despite anticoagulation and before surgical intervention could be performed, the patient developed a right-sided chylothorax which was drained. An autologous pericardial patch repair of the SVC and a thrombectomy of SVC clots was subsequently performed. This was only partially successful and the SVCO recurred. A low fatty chain diet was initiated to manage the chylothorax, which remains stable. This rare complication has left the patient with a small pleural effusion and chronic pleural thickening. They can still exercise with mild breathlessness. The management of such a complication, which requires the input of many specialists, is challenging and often does not completely resolve all symptoms. For this reason, superior vena cava obstruction should be considered as a risk during the consenting procedure for a pacemaker insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":72274,"journal":{"name":"Archive of clinical cases","volume":"11 2","pages":"51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of clinical cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22551/2024.43.1102.10288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the number of pacemaker insertions increases to manage numerous cardiac arrhythmias, the number of complications is also increasing as a result. More common complications such as infection and lead displacement are routinely discussed with patients before they undergo the procedure. However rare complications such as superior vena cava syndrome are not discussed during the consenting period. But they do occur, as seen in this case of a 69-year-old male. This fit and active man had a right-sided dual-chamber pacemaker inserted due to sinus node disease and presented 5 years later with symptoms suggestive of superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO). Despite anticoagulation and before surgical intervention could be performed, the patient developed a right-sided chylothorax which was drained. An autologous pericardial patch repair of the SVC and a thrombectomy of SVC clots was subsequently performed. This was only partially successful and the SVCO recurred. A low fatty chain diet was initiated to manage the chylothorax, which remains stable. This rare complication has left the patient with a small pleural effusion and chronic pleural thickening. They can still exercise with mild breathlessness. The management of such a complication, which requires the input of many specialists, is challenging and often does not completely resolve all symptoms. For this reason, superior vena cava obstruction should be considered as a risk during the consenting procedure for a pacemaker insertion.

起搏器导线血栓--导致呼吸困难的罕见原因。
随着为控制各种心律失常而植入起搏器的数量增加,并发症的数量也随之增加。感染和导联移位等较常见的并发症在患者接受手术前都会进行常规讨论。然而,上腔静脉综合征等罕见并发症并没有在同意手术期间进行讨论。但这种并发症确实存在,本例中一名 69 岁的男性就是如此。这名体格健壮、活泼好动的男子因窦房结病而安装了右侧双腔起搏器,5 年后出现了提示上腔静脉阻塞 (SVCO) 的症状。尽管进行了抗凝治疗,但在进行手术治疗之前,患者出现了右侧乳糜胸,并进行了引流。随后对上腔静脉进行了自体心包补片修复,并对上腔静脉血栓进行了切除。但这只取得了部分成功,SVCO 再次复发。为了控制乳糜胸,患者开始进食低脂肪链饮食,目前病情仍然稳定。这种罕见的并发症导致患者有少量胸腔积液和慢性胸膜增厚。他们仍然可以进行运动,但有轻微的呼吸困难。这种并发症的处理需要许多专家的参与,具有挑战性,而且往往不能完全消除所有症状。因此,在起搏器植入同意程序中,应将上腔静脉阻塞视为一种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信