"There has to be more caring": patient and care partner experiences of the disclosure of amyloid-β PET scan results.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elyse Couch, Wenhan Zhang, Emmanuelle Belanger, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Nicole DePasquale, Courtney H Van Houtven, Emily A Gadbois, Terrie Wetle
{"title":"\"There has to be more caring\": patient and care partner experiences of the disclosure of amyloid-β PET scan results.","authors":"Elyse Couch, Wenhan Zhang, Emmanuelle Belanger, Megan Shepherd-Banigan, Nicole DePasquale, Courtney H Van Houtven, Emily A Gadbois, Terrie Wetle","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2024.2371471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore patient and care partner experiences of receiving an amyloid scan result, with a focus on how clinician disclosure practices influenced patient and care partner emotional responses to the scan result and/or diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with 38 people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and 62 care partners who experienced the disclosure of results from an amyloid PET scan as part of the CARE-IDEAS study. We used thematic analysis to analyze interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four aspects of the disclosure process that could influence patient and care partner emotional experiences of the scan result/diagnosis: (1) mode of delivery, (2) presence of a care partner, (3) clarity of the scan result explanation, and (4) discussion of post-scan treatment and support options.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emotional experiences of an amyloid scan result can vary depending on how results are communicated. These findings support previous efforts to develop standard disclosure protocols. Scan results should be delivered in person with the care partner present. Clinicians should give a clear explanation of the result and its implications in an empathetic manner. Options for treatment and support should be discussed for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2371471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore patient and care partner experiences of receiving an amyloid scan result, with a focus on how clinician disclosure practices influenced patient and care partner emotional responses to the scan result and/or diagnosis.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 38 people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and 62 care partners who experienced the disclosure of results from an amyloid PET scan as part of the CARE-IDEAS study. We used thematic analysis to analyze interview transcripts.

Results: We identified four aspects of the disclosure process that could influence patient and care partner emotional experiences of the scan result/diagnosis: (1) mode of delivery, (2) presence of a care partner, (3) clarity of the scan result explanation, and (4) discussion of post-scan treatment and support options.

Conclusions: Emotional experiences of an amyloid scan result can vary depending on how results are communicated. These findings support previous efforts to develop standard disclosure protocols. Scan results should be delivered in person with the care partner present. Clinicians should give a clear explanation of the result and its implications in an empathetic manner. Options for treatment and support should be discussed for all patients.

"必须给予更多关怀":患者和护理伙伴对披露淀粉样蛋白-β PET 扫描结果的体验。
目的探讨患者和护理伙伴在收到淀粉样蛋白扫描结果时的经历,重点关注临床医生的披露做法如何影响患者和护理伙伴对扫描结果和/或诊断的情绪反应:作为 CARE-IDEAS 研究的一部分,我们对 38 名轻度认知障碍或痴呆患者和 62 名护理伙伴进行了半结构式访谈,他们都经历过淀粉样蛋白 PET 扫描结果的披露。我们采用主题分析法对访谈记录进行了分析:我们确定了披露过程中可能影响患者和护理伙伴对扫描结果/诊断的情感体验的四个方面:(1)提供方式;(2)护理伙伴在场;(3)扫描结果解释的清晰度;以及(4)对扫描后治疗和支持方案的讨论:淀粉样蛋白扫描结果的情感体验会因结果传达方式的不同而有所差异。这些发现支持了之前制定标准披露协议的努力。扫描结果应在护理伙伴在场的情况下当面告知。临床医生应以感同身受的方式清楚解释结果及其影响。应与所有患者讨论治疗和支持方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging & Mental Health
Aging & Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods. Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信