The impact of real-time ultrasound guidance for ventricular catheter placement in cerebrospinal fluid shunts - a single center study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Sevgi Sarikaya-Seiwert, Arndt-Hendrik Schievelkamp, Mark Born, Christian Wispel, Hannes Haberl, Ehab Shabo
{"title":"The impact of real-time ultrasound guidance for ventricular catheter placement in cerebrospinal fluid shunts - a single center study.","authors":"Sevgi Sarikaya-Seiwert, Arndt-Hendrik Schievelkamp, Mark Born, Christian Wispel, Hannes Haberl, Ehab Shabo","doi":"10.1055/a-2352-9404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose Misplacement of ventricular catheters in shunt surgery occurs in 40% with freehand technique and represents therefore a risk for early shunt failure. The goal of this retrospective, single center study is to analyze the impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on ventricular catheter positioning and early outcome of shunt survival. Materials and Methods We analyzed the charts and images of all patients who underwent shunt surgery from 09/2017 to 12/2022 and compared the position of ventricular catheter by using the freehand technique and real-time ultrasound guidance. Central catheter position was graded as grade I (optimal), II (contact with ventricle structures or contralateral) and III (misplacement). Results Ventricular catheter was placed in 244 patients using real-time US-guidance and in 506 patients using freehand technique. The mean age (53.4 and 53.6 years respectively) and the preoperative frontal occipital horn ratio (FOHR; 0.47 versus 0.44) were almost equal in both groups. In the study group, grade I catheter position was achieved in 64%, grade II in 34% and grade III in 2%. The control group showed grade I position in 45%, grade II in 32% and grade III in 23% of cases (p<0.05). Early central catheter failure rate was the highest in grade III (40.5%) compared to 4% in grade I. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that real-time US-guidance lead to a significant improvement of ventricular catheter placement. In consequence early shunt revisions decrease significantly. Further prospective, randomized, and controlled studies comparing standard method to a real-time ultrasound catheter placement are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2352-9404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Misplacement of ventricular catheters in shunt surgery occurs in 40% with freehand technique and represents therefore a risk for early shunt failure. The goal of this retrospective, single center study is to analyze the impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on ventricular catheter positioning and early outcome of shunt survival. Materials and Methods We analyzed the charts and images of all patients who underwent shunt surgery from 09/2017 to 12/2022 and compared the position of ventricular catheter by using the freehand technique and real-time ultrasound guidance. Central catheter position was graded as grade I (optimal), II (contact with ventricle structures or contralateral) and III (misplacement). Results Ventricular catheter was placed in 244 patients using real-time US-guidance and in 506 patients using freehand technique. The mean age (53.4 and 53.6 years respectively) and the preoperative frontal occipital horn ratio (FOHR; 0.47 versus 0.44) were almost equal in both groups. In the study group, grade I catheter position was achieved in 64%, grade II in 34% and grade III in 2%. The control group showed grade I position in 45%, grade II in 32% and grade III in 23% of cases (p<0.05). Early central catheter failure rate was the highest in grade III (40.5%) compared to 4% in grade I. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that real-time US-guidance lead to a significant improvement of ventricular catheter placement. In consequence early shunt revisions decrease significantly. Further prospective, randomized, and controlled studies comparing standard method to a real-time ultrasound catheter placement are required.

实时超声引导脑脊液分流术中心室导管置入的影响--一项单中心研究。
目的 在分流手术中,40% 的人工分流手术会出现心室导管错位的情况,这也是分流手术早期失败的风险之一。本项回顾性单中心研究旨在分析实时超声引导对心室导管定位和分流术早期存活率的影响。材料与方法 我们分析了 2017 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受分流手术的所有患者的病历和图像,并比较了使用徒手技术和实时超声引导的心室导管位置。中心导管位置分为 I 级(最佳)、II 级(与心室结构或对侧接触)和 III 级(错位)。结果 244 名患者使用实时超声引导置入了心室导管,506 名患者使用徒手技术置入了心室导管。两组患者的平均年龄(分别为 53.4 岁和 53.6 岁)和术前额枕角比率(FOHR;0.47 对 0.44)几乎相同。研究组中,64%的导管位置达到 I 级,34%达到 II 级,2%达到 III 级。对照组中,45%的病例导管位置为 I 级,32%为 II 级,23%为 III 级(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信