Flower therapy and perceived stress in primary health care nursing professionals: randomized clinical trial.

Q3 Nursing
Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230132.en
Fabiana Gonçalves Seki Gava, Ruth Natália Teresa Turrini
{"title":"Flower therapy and perceived stress in primary health care nursing professionals: randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Fabiana Gonçalves Seki Gava, Ruth Natália Teresa Turrini","doi":"10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230132.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effectiveness of Bach flower therapy compared to placebo in reducing perceived stress levels in primary health care nursing professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Pragmatic, parallel randomized clinical trial conducted with 87 primary care nursing professionals with self-identified stress, from October 2021 to June 2022, in the cities of Osasco and São Paulo, Brazil. The intervention group (n=43) received the collective flower formula, and the placebo group (n=44) received only the diluent. Data analysis was performed using the linear mixed model, and effect size was measured by partial Eta squared, significance level 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis showed a significant reduction in perceived stress levels within groups (p=0.038). However, there was no significant difference between the study groups (p=0.750). Participants in the intervention group reported a greater perception of changes than participants in the placebo group, but without statistical significance (p=0,089).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The floral formula was not more effective than the placebo formula in reducing perceived stress. There was a significant stress reduction among nursing professionals in both study groups, although with a small effect size.</p>","PeriodicalId":35609,"journal":{"name":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista gaucha de enfermagem / EENFUFRGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20230132.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of Bach flower therapy compared to placebo in reducing perceived stress levels in primary health care nursing professionals.

Method: Pragmatic, parallel randomized clinical trial conducted with 87 primary care nursing professionals with self-identified stress, from October 2021 to June 2022, in the cities of Osasco and São Paulo, Brazil. The intervention group (n=43) received the collective flower formula, and the placebo group (n=44) received only the diluent. Data analysis was performed using the linear mixed model, and effect size was measured by partial Eta squared, significance level 5%.

Results: Data analysis showed a significant reduction in perceived stress levels within groups (p=0.038). However, there was no significant difference between the study groups (p=0.750). Participants in the intervention group reported a greater perception of changes than participants in the placebo group, but without statistical significance (p=0,089).

Conclusion: The floral formula was not more effective than the placebo formula in reducing perceived stress. There was a significant stress reduction among nursing professionals in both study groups, although with a small effect size.

花疗法与初级保健护理专业人员的压力感知:随机临床试验。
目的分析巴赫花疗法与安慰剂相比在降低初级保健护理专业人员感知压力水平方面的效果:2021年10月至2022年6月,在巴西奥萨斯科市和圣保罗市对87名自认压力较大的初级保健护理专业人员进行了务实的平行随机临床试验。干预组(43 人)接受集体花配方,安慰剂组(44 人)仅接受稀释剂。数据分析采用线性混合模型,效应大小用部分 Eta 平方衡量,显著性水平为 5%:数据分析显示,各组内的感知压力水平明显降低(P=0.038)。然而,研究组之间没有明显差异(P=0.750)。干预组的参与者比安慰剂组的参与者感受到了更大的变化,但没有统计学意义(p=0,089):结论:在减轻压力方面,鲜花配方并不比安慰剂配方更有效。在两个研究组中,护理专业人员的压力都有明显减轻,但效果很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul edita e publica a Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem para divulgar a produção científica da Enfermagem e áreas afins. Foi criada em 1976 e atualmente tem periodicidade trimestral.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信