The Role of Harm Visibility for Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigars.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sonia A Clark, Sarah D Kowitt, Kristen L Jarman, Allison J Lazard, Tara L Queen, Leah M Ranney, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, Paschal Sheeran, James F Thrasher, Adam O Goldstein
{"title":"The Role of Harm Visibility for Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigars.","authors":"Sonia A Clark, Sarah D Kowitt, Kristen L Jarman, Allison J Lazard, Tara L Queen, Leah M Ranney, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, Paschal Sheeran, James F Thrasher, Adam O Goldstein","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) can communicate the harms of tobacco product use, yet little research exists for cigars. We sought to identify the most effective types of images to pair with newly developed cigar HWLs.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>In September 2021, we conducted an online survey experiment with US adults who reported using little cigars, cigarillos, or large cigars in the past 30 days (n = 753). After developing nine statements about health effects of cigar use, we randomized participants to view one of three levels of harm visibility paired with each statement, either: (1) an image depicting internal harm not visible outside the body, (2) an image depicting external harm visible outside of the body, or (3) two images depicting both internal and external harm. After viewing each image, participants answered questions on perceived message effectiveness (PME), negative affect, and visual-verbal redundancy (VVR). We used linear mixed models to examine the effect of harm visibility on each outcome, controlling for warning statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Warnings with both and external harm depictions performed significantly better than the internal harm depictions across all outcomes, including PME (B = 0.21 and B = 0.17), negative affect (B = 0.26 and B = 0.25), and VVR (B = 0.24 and B = 0.17), respectively (all p < .001). Compared to both, the external depiction of harm did not significantly change PME or negative affect but did significantly lower VVR (B = -0.07, p = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future cigar pictorial HWLs may benefit from including images depicting both or external harm depictions. Future research should examine harm visibility's effect for other tobacco pictorial HWLs.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The cigar health warning labels (HWLs) proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration are text-only. We conducted an online survey experiment among people who use cigars to examine the effectiveness of warnings with images depicting different levels of harm visibility. We found HWLs with images depicting both an internal and external depiction of cigar harm, or an external depiction of harm alone, performed better overall than images portraying internal depictions of harm. These findings provide important regulatory evidence regarding what type of images may increase warning effectiveness and offer a promising route for future cigar HWL development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"714-721"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) can communicate the harms of tobacco product use, yet little research exists for cigars. We sought to identify the most effective types of images to pair with newly developed cigar HWLs.

Aims and methods: In September 2021, we conducted an online survey experiment with US adults who reported using little cigars, cigarillos, or large cigars in the past 30 days (n = 753). After developing nine statements about health effects of cigar use, we randomized participants to view one of three levels of harm visibility paired with each statement, either: (1) an image depicting internal harm not visible outside the body, (2) an image depicting external harm visible outside of the body, or (3) two images depicting both internal and external harm. After viewing each image, participants answered questions on perceived message effectiveness (PME), negative affect, and visual-verbal redundancy (VVR). We used linear mixed models to examine the effect of harm visibility on each outcome, controlling for warning statement.

Results: Warnings with both and external harm depictions performed significantly better than the internal harm depictions across all outcomes, including PME (B = 0.21 and B = 0.17), negative affect (B = 0.26 and B = 0.25), and VVR (B = 0.24 and B = 0.17), respectively (all p < .001). Compared to both, the external depiction of harm did not significantly change PME or negative affect but did significantly lower VVR (B = -0.07, p = .01).

Conclusions: Future cigar pictorial HWLs may benefit from including images depicting both or external harm depictions. Future research should examine harm visibility's effect for other tobacco pictorial HWLs.

Implications: The cigar health warning labels (HWLs) proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration are text-only. We conducted an online survey experiment among people who use cigars to examine the effectiveness of warnings with images depicting different levels of harm visibility. We found HWLs with images depicting both an internal and external depiction of cigar harm, or an external depiction of harm alone, performed better overall than images portraying internal depictions of harm. These findings provide important regulatory evidence regarding what type of images may increase warning effectiveness and offer a promising route for future cigar HWL development.

危害可见度对雪茄上图形化健康警示标签的作用。
导言:图片式健康警示标签(HWL)可以传达使用烟草产品的危害,但针对雪茄的研究却很少。我们试图找出与新开发的雪茄健康警示配对的最有效的图片类型:2021 年 9 月,我们对报告在过去 30 天内使用过小雪茄、雪茄烟或大雪茄的美国成年人(n = 753)进行了在线调查实验。在制定了九项关于使用雪茄对健康影响的声明后,我们随机让参与者观看与每项声明搭配的三种危害可见度之一:(1)一张描述体内危害的图片,不可见于体外;(2)一张描述体外危害的图片,可见于体外;或(3)两张描述体内和体外危害的图片。观看完每张图片后,参与者回答有关感知信息有效性(PME)、负面情绪和视觉语言冗余(VVR)的问题。我们使用线性混合模型研究了危害可见性对每种结果的影响,并对警告声明进行了控制:结果:在所有结果中,包括PME(B = 0.21和B = 0.17)、负面情绪(B = 0.26和B = 0.25)和视觉-语言冗余(VVR)(B = 0.24和B = 0.17),两者和外部危害描述的警告效果都明显优于内部危害描述(所有P < .001)。与两者相比,对危害的外部描述并没有显著改变 PME 或负面情绪,但却显著降低了 VVR(B = -0.07,P = .01):结论:未来的雪茄图形化健康生活方式可能会受益于同时描绘两种伤害或外部伤害的图片。未来的研究应考察危害可视性对其他烟草图形健康警示的影响:美国食品和药物管理局建议的雪茄健康警示(HWLs)是纯文字的。我们在使用雪茄的人群中进行了一项在线调查实验,以考察带有不同危害可见度的图片的健康警示的效果。我们发现,同时描绘雪茄危害的内部和外部图像或仅描绘危害的外部图像的健康警示语的总体效果优于描绘危害的内部图像。这些发现提供了重要的监管证据,说明哪种类型的图像可以提高警示效果,并为未来雪茄健康警示语的开发提供了一条很有前景的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信