Predicting clinical entry point for thoracic epidural catheter insertion during paramedian approach: A prospective observational study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bhakti Y Deshmukh, Madhavi G Shetmahajan, Sumitra G Bakshi, Parmanand Jain
{"title":"Predicting clinical entry point for thoracic epidural catheter insertion during paramedian approach: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Bhakti Y Deshmukh, Madhavi G Shetmahajan, Sumitra G Bakshi, Parmanand Jain","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_448_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Thoracic epidural insertion has high failure rates in the mid-thoracic region due to steep angulation of oblique bending of spinous processes. The preferred skin puncture point for epidural needle insertion in the paramedian sagittal plane with respect to the superior/inferior tip of spinous process or inter-spinous cleft in the mid-thoracic region (T5-8) is not standard. The primary objective of this prospective observational study was to find the skin puncture point which had the best success rate for a successful epidural catheterization. Secondary objectives were to study the number of attempts and passes required to locate epidural space, incidence of failed epidural, and its relationship with patient characteristics and demographics.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After informed consent, 155 patients planned for general anesthesia with epidural analgesia in the mid-thoracic region were included in the trial. Patient demographics, the details of epidural attempts with respect to anatomical landmarks, distance from the midline, and number of passes in each attempt were noted. Epidural catheterization was considered successful after demonstrating dermatomal band of sensory blockade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate at different skin puncture sites was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.58). We found a failure rate of 12.9%. Failed epidural catheterization was significantly high in the age group >56 years (<i>n</i> = 62 and <i>P</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, none of the skin puncture points had a significant association with successful epidural insertion in mid-thoracic segments using a para-median approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_448_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Thoracic epidural insertion has high failure rates in the mid-thoracic region due to steep angulation of oblique bending of spinous processes. The preferred skin puncture point for epidural needle insertion in the paramedian sagittal plane with respect to the superior/inferior tip of spinous process or inter-spinous cleft in the mid-thoracic region (T5-8) is not standard. The primary objective of this prospective observational study was to find the skin puncture point which had the best success rate for a successful epidural catheterization. Secondary objectives were to study the number of attempts and passes required to locate epidural space, incidence of failed epidural, and its relationship with patient characteristics and demographics.

Material and methods: After informed consent, 155 patients planned for general anesthesia with epidural analgesia in the mid-thoracic region were included in the trial. Patient demographics, the details of epidural attempts with respect to anatomical landmarks, distance from the midline, and number of passes in each attempt were noted. Epidural catheterization was considered successful after demonstrating dermatomal band of sensory blockade.

Results: The success rate at different skin puncture sites was not statistically significant (P = 0.58). We found a failure rate of 12.9%. Failed epidural catheterization was significantly high in the age group >56 years (n = 62 and P = 0.007).

Conclusion: In our study, none of the skin puncture points had a significant association with successful epidural insertion in mid-thoracic segments using a para-median approach.

预测胸腔硬膜外导管在辅助入路时的临床插入点:前瞻性观察研究。
背景和目的:由于脊柱棘突斜弯角度陡峭,胸椎硬膜外针插入中胸椎区域的失败率很高。在胸椎中段(T5-8)脊柱棘突上/下端或棘突间隙的矢状面旁侧,硬膜外穿刺针首选的皮肤穿刺点并不标准。这项前瞻性观察研究的主要目的是找到硬膜外导管插入成功率最高的皮肤穿刺点。次要目标是研究定位硬膜外腔所需的尝试和穿刺次数、硬膜外腔穿刺失败的发生率及其与患者特征和人口统计学的关系:经知情同意后,155 名计划在中胸段进行硬膜外镇痛的全身麻醉患者被纳入试验。试验中记录了患者的人口统计学特征、硬膜外尝试的解剖标志细节、与中线的距离以及每次尝试的次数。硬膜外导管插入术在显示皮肤感觉阻滞带后即为成功:不同皮肤穿刺部位的成功率无统计学意义(P = 0.58)。我们发现失败率为 12.9%。硬膜外导管穿刺失败率在年龄大于 56 岁的人群中明显偏高(n = 62,P = 0.007):结论:在我们的研究中,没有一个皮肤穿刺点与使用副中线方法在中胸段成功插入硬膜外导管有明显关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信