Post-operative vomiting after pediatric strabismus surgery: A comparison of propofol versus sevoflurane anaesthesia.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shalini Subramanian, Deepa Shetty, Poornima Shivanna, Priyanka Das, Medha Phadke
{"title":"Post-operative vomiting after pediatric strabismus surgery: A comparison of propofol versus sevoflurane anaesthesia.","authors":"Shalini Subramanian, Deepa Shetty, Poornima Shivanna, Priyanka Das, Medha Phadke","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_363_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Squint surgery is a risk factor for postoperative vomiting (POV) in children. This study was designed to compare the incidence of POV in children undergoing strabismus surgery under balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane versus intravenous anesthesia with propofol.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled study conducted in a tertiary care ophthalmology hospital, 70 ASA I-II children aged 1-12 years undergoing strabismus surgery were randomized to two groups -Group S (sevoflurane-based anesthesia) and Group P (propofol-based anesthesia) for maintenance. The surgical details, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery characteristics, and emergence delirium were recorded. Any episode of postoperative vomiting in the 0-2 hours, 2-6 hours, and 6-24 hours period was noted. Rescue antiemetic was administered if there was more than one episode of vomiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the groups were similar with respect to demographic and surgical details. The average duration of surgery was 118.2 ± 41.88 min in group S and 137.32 ± 39.09 min in group P (<i>P</i> = .05). Four children in group S (11.4%) and one child in group P (2.9%) had POV in the first 24 hours but this was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .36). The median time to discharge from post anesthesia care unit was significantly less (<i>P</i> = .02) in the P group (50 min) than in the S group (60 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Propofol-based anesthesia does not offer advantage over sevoflurane, in reducing POV after squint surgery, when dual prophylaxis with dexamethasone and ondansetron is administered. It, however, reduces the duration of stay in the post anesthesia care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_363_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Squint surgery is a risk factor for postoperative vomiting (POV) in children. This study was designed to compare the incidence of POV in children undergoing strabismus surgery under balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane versus intravenous anesthesia with propofol.

Material and methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study conducted in a tertiary care ophthalmology hospital, 70 ASA I-II children aged 1-12 years undergoing strabismus surgery were randomized to two groups -Group S (sevoflurane-based anesthesia) and Group P (propofol-based anesthesia) for maintenance. The surgical details, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery characteristics, and emergence delirium were recorded. Any episode of postoperative vomiting in the 0-2 hours, 2-6 hours, and 6-24 hours period was noted. Rescue antiemetic was administered if there was more than one episode of vomiting.

Results: Both the groups were similar with respect to demographic and surgical details. The average duration of surgery was 118.2 ± 41.88 min in group S and 137.32 ± 39.09 min in group P (P = .05). Four children in group S (11.4%) and one child in group P (2.9%) had POV in the first 24 hours but this was not statistically significant (P = .36). The median time to discharge from post anesthesia care unit was significantly less (P = .02) in the P group (50 min) than in the S group (60 min).

Conclusion: Propofol-based anesthesia does not offer advantage over sevoflurane, in reducing POV after squint surgery, when dual prophylaxis with dexamethasone and ondansetron is administered. It, however, reduces the duration of stay in the post anesthesia care unit.

小儿斜视手术后的术后呕吐:异丙酚与七氟醚麻醉的比较。
背景和目的:斜视手术是儿童术后呕吐(POV)的一个危险因素。本研究旨在比较七氟醚平衡麻醉与丙泊酚静脉麻醉下斜视手术患儿术后呕吐的发生率:这项前瞻性随机对照研究在一家三级眼科医院进行,70名年龄在1-12岁接受斜视手术的ASA I-II级儿童被随机分为两组--S组(七氟烷麻醉)和P组(丙泊酚麻醉)。手术细节、术中血流动力学参数、术后恢复特征和术后谵妄均被记录在案。记录术后 0-2 小时、2-6 小时和 6-24 小时内的任何呕吐情况。如果呕吐不止一次,则进行补救性止吐:两组患者在人口统计学和手术细节方面相似。S组的平均手术时间为(118.2 ± 41.88)分钟,P组为(137.32 ± 39.09)分钟(P = .05)。S组有4名患儿(11.4%)和P组有1名患儿(2.9%)在术后24小时内出现POV,但无统计学意义(P = .36)。从麻醉后监护室出院的中位时间,P 组(50 分钟)明显少于 S 组(60 分钟)(P = .02):结论:在使用地塞米松和昂丹司琼双重预防措施的情况下,丙泊酚麻醉在减少斜视手术后POV方面与七氟醚相比没有优势。不过,它可以缩短在麻醉后护理病房的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信