Attitudes and Confidence in Communication Skills of Fourth-Year Medical Students After Online Small Group Discussion and Peer Role-Play: A Survey Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Wuttipat Iammeechai, Thitiphan Srikulmontri, Phatsawut Siritongtaworn, Woraphat Ratta-Apha
{"title":"Attitudes and Confidence in Communication Skills of Fourth-Year Medical Students After Online Small Group Discussion and Peer Role-Play: A Survey Study.","authors":"Wuttipat Iammeechai, Thitiphan Srikulmontri, Phatsawut Siritongtaworn, Woraphat Ratta-Apha","doi":"10.1007/s40596-024-01998-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the impact of online small group discussions and peer role-play on medical students' attitudes toward and confidence in communication skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved a 3-hour instructional design that integrated small group discussions and role-plays to enhance the communication abilities of fourth-year medical students. The data were obtained from students through a post-activity online survey. Likert scale responses were quantified as percentages. Students' narrative feedback on their learning achievements was subjected to content analysis. Codes and categories were agreed upon by investigators and reviewed by an external auditor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 151 medical students responded to the survey, representing a 47.94% response rate. The majority strongly agreed that good communication skills help physicians obtain reliable information (94.00%) and that practicing questioning skills is essential (92.1%). Content analysis revealed that nearly half (48.34%) considered that the learning activities fostered positive attitudes toward communication. These attitudinal improvements included increased empathy and emotional care (37.75%), recognition of communication as a trainable skill (10.57%), and recognition of the necessity of communication skills for physicians (8.61%). Additionally, most students (75.5%) reported increased confidence in their communication skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In alignment with transformative learning theory, online small group discussions combined with peer role-play may potentially enhance the attitudes and confidence of medical students in relation to communication skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-024-01998-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the impact of online small group discussions and peer role-play on medical students' attitudes toward and confidence in communication skills.

Methods: The study involved a 3-hour instructional design that integrated small group discussions and role-plays to enhance the communication abilities of fourth-year medical students. The data were obtained from students through a post-activity online survey. Likert scale responses were quantified as percentages. Students' narrative feedback on their learning achievements was subjected to content analysis. Codes and categories were agreed upon by investigators and reviewed by an external auditor.

Results: A total of 151 medical students responded to the survey, representing a 47.94% response rate. The majority strongly agreed that good communication skills help physicians obtain reliable information (94.00%) and that practicing questioning skills is essential (92.1%). Content analysis revealed that nearly half (48.34%) considered that the learning activities fostered positive attitudes toward communication. These attitudinal improvements included increased empathy and emotional care (37.75%), recognition of communication as a trainable skill (10.57%), and recognition of the necessity of communication skills for physicians (8.61%). Additionally, most students (75.5%) reported increased confidence in their communication skills.

Conclusions: In alignment with transformative learning theory, online small group discussions combined with peer role-play may potentially enhance the attitudes and confidence of medical students in relation to communication skills.

在线小组讨论和同伴角色扮演后医学专业四年级学生对沟通技巧的态度和信心:一项调查研究。
目的:本研究调查了在线小组讨论和同伴角色扮演对医学生沟通技能的态度和信心的影响:本研究调查了在线小组讨论和同伴角色扮演对医学生沟通技能态度和信心的影响:研究设计了一个 3 小时的教学活动,将小组讨论和角色扮演相结合,以提高四年级医学生的沟通能力。通过活动后的在线调查从学生中获取数据。李克特量表的回答被量化为百分比。对学生关于学习成果的叙述性反馈进行了内容分析。编码和类别由调查人员商定,并由外部审计人员进行审查:共有 151 名医学生回复了调查,回复率为 47.94%。大多数人非常同意良好的沟通技巧有助于医生获得可靠的信息(94.00%),并认为练习提问技巧至关重要(92.1%)。内容分析显示,近一半(48.34%)的人认为学习活动培养了积极的沟通态度。这些态度上的改进包括增加了同理心和情感关怀(37.75%),认识到沟通是一种可训练的技能(10.57%),以及认识到沟通技能对医生的必要性(8.61%)。此外,大多数学生(75.5%)表示对自己的沟通技巧增强了信心:与转化学习理论相一致,在线小组讨论与同伴角色扮演相结合可能会增强医学生对沟通技能的态度和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy. The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信