Showcasing reality content on the front page: Comparing four services on the Danish video streaming market

IF 0.9 2区艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION

Critical Studies in Television Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1177/17496020241259734

Mads Møller T Andersen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is based on a three-year-long content analysis of the use of reality TV content on the front pages of four popular video streaming services in Denmark: DRTV, TV 2 Play, Viaplay, and Netflix. The results give rare insights into front pages that are normally hidden behind logins but also longitudinal perspectives about the services’ changing curation practices. In particular, the two institutions with public-service obligations, DR and TV 2, have VOD services that showcase reality content more prominently than the two commercial competitors in this study. These findings point to how the reality genre’s role has changed over the years, since DR and TV 2 now embrace reality content in a strategy to offer ‘Danish content’ that stands out from what their foreign competitors offer.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在首页展示现实内容：比较丹麦视频流媒体市场上的四种服务

本文基于一项长达三年的内容分析，分析了丹麦四家流行视频流媒体服务公司头版对真人秀内容的使用情况：DRTV、TV 2 Play、Viaplay 和 Netflix。研究结果为我们提供了罕见的洞察力，使我们了解到通常隐藏在登录页面之后的头版内容，同时也为我们提供了纵向视角，使我们了解到这些服务不断变化的策划实践。尤其是 DR 和 TV 2 这两家承担公共服务义务的机构，其 VOD 服务比本研究中的两家商业竞争者更突出地展示了真人秀内容。这些研究结果表明，现实题材的角色在过去几年中发生了变化，因为 DR 和 TV 2 现在将现实题材内容作为提供 "丹麦内容 "的战略，在其外国竞争对手提供的内容中脱颖而出。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Studies in Television FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

30.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Studies in Television publishes articles that draw together divergent disciplines and different ways of thinking, to promote and advance television as a distinct academic discipline. It welcomes contributions on any aspect of television—production studies and institutional histories, audience and reception studies, theoretical approaches, conceptual paradigms and pedagogical questions. It continues to invite analyses of the compositional principles and aesthetics of texts, as well as contextual matters relating to both contemporary and past productions. CST also features book reviews, dossiers and debates. The journal is scholarly but accessible, dedicated to generating new knowledge and fostering a dynamic intellectual platform for television studies.