Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using microbubbles in human pregnancy: A scoping review.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Sophie Dassen, Loes Monen, Guid Oei, Massimo Mischi, Judith van Laar
{"title":"Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using microbubbles in human pregnancy: A scoping review.","authors":"Sophie Dassen, Loes Monen, Guid Oei, Massimo Mischi, Judith van Laar","doi":"10.1055/a-2351-0747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Successful placentation is crucial for fetal development and maintaining a healthy pregnancy. Placental insufficiency can cause a variety of obstetric complications. Despite the many efforts to enhance diagnosing placental insufficiency, no imaging technique has proven satisfactory. A promising imaging technique is contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using microbubbles which has proven capable of (micro)vascular imaging. Its use for placental vascularization assessment in human pregnancies remains constrained by limited evidence and safety concerns. This scoping review aims to demonstrate the safety of CEUS used in human pregnancy in the published literature to date.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic search using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. All studies where contrast-enhanced ultrasound was used in pregnant humans were included. Studies, where there was a planned termination of pregnancy, were excluded. To assess the safety of CEUS during pregnancy, relevant outcomes were divided into the following 3 categories; fetal outcome, maternal outcome, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 articles were included, in which 256 women underwent CEUS during pregnancy. No clinically significant maternal or fetal adverse events or negative pregnancy or neonatal outcomes associated with CEUS were described.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our findings, we consider expanding the knowledge of this promising diagnostic technique in future larger clinical studies to be safe and relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2351-0747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Successful placentation is crucial for fetal development and maintaining a healthy pregnancy. Placental insufficiency can cause a variety of obstetric complications. Despite the many efforts to enhance diagnosing placental insufficiency, no imaging technique has proven satisfactory. A promising imaging technique is contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) using microbubbles which has proven capable of (micro)vascular imaging. Its use for placental vascularization assessment in human pregnancies remains constrained by limited evidence and safety concerns. This scoping review aims to demonstrate the safety of CEUS used in human pregnancy in the published literature to date.

Material and methods: A systematic search using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. All studies where contrast-enhanced ultrasound was used in pregnant humans were included. Studies, where there was a planned termination of pregnancy, were excluded. To assess the safety of CEUS during pregnancy, relevant outcomes were divided into the following 3 categories; fetal outcome, maternal outcome, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Results: A total of 13 articles were included, in which 256 women underwent CEUS during pregnancy. No clinically significant maternal or fetal adverse events or negative pregnancy or neonatal outcomes associated with CEUS were described.

Conclusion: Based on our findings, we consider expanding the knowledge of this promising diagnostic technique in future larger clinical studies to be safe and relevant.

人类妊娠使用微气泡造影剂增强超声波的安全性:范围审查。
导言--成功的胎盘植入对胎儿发育和维持妊娠健康至关重要。胎盘功能不全可导致多种产科并发症。尽管人们为提高胎盘功能不全的诊断率做出了很多努力,但目前还没有一种成像技术能达到令人满意的效果。一种很有前景的成像技术是使用微气泡的对比增强超声(CEUS),它已被证实能进行(微)血管成像。由于证据有限且存在安全隐患,该技术在人类妊娠胎盘血管化评估中的应用仍受到限制。本范围综述旨在展示迄今为止已发表文献中用于人类妊娠的 CEUS 的安全性。材料和方法 - 使用 PubMed、Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了系统性检索。所有在人类孕妇中使用造影剂增强超声波的研究均包括在内。排除了计划终止妊娠的研究。为了评估妊娠期间 CEUS 的安全性,相关结果分为以下三类:胎儿结果、产妇结果以及妊娠和新生儿结果。结果 - 共纳入13篇文章,其中256名妇女在孕期接受了CEUS检查。未发现与CEUS相关的具有临床意义的孕产妇或胎儿不良事件,也未发现与CEUS相关的不良妊娠结局或新生儿结局。结论 - 基于我们的研究结果,我们认为在未来扩大对这一前景广阔的诊断技术的了解、进行更大规模的临床研究是安全和有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信