Health net-outcome objectives and approaches for spatial planning and development: a scoping review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00464

James Stewart-Evans, Emma Wilson, Tessa Langley, Angela Hands, Jo Leonardi-Bee

{"title":"Health net-outcome objectives and approaches for spatial planning and development: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"James Stewart-Evans, Emma Wilson, Tessa Langley, Angela Hands, Jo Leonardi-Bee","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to review the body of knowledge on net gain and no net loss (net-outcome) objectives and approaches applicable to health in spatial planning and development policies and practice.Introduction: There is an established body of academic and gray literature addressing environmental net-outcome objectives, such as biodiversity net gain, in spatial planning policies and practice. A \"health net gain\" objective has recently been proposed as a driver for health protection and the realization of health. Such an objective and approach are yet to be scoped and defined.Inclusion criteria: This review will consider sources in the scientific and gray literature that describe health net-outcome objectives that can be implemented in spatial planning and development policies and practice. Source contexts will not be limited to specific countries, geographical areas, or settings. All types of evidence will be considered.Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched include PsycINFO (APA), Embase, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and selected databases from the ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection. Sources of gray literature to be searched include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, TRIP Pro, and BASE. No language or date restrictions will be applied. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and review full-text studies and extract data. The results will be presented in tabular or diagrammatic format with a narrative summary.Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4dbcm.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to review the body of knowledge on net gain and no net loss (net-outcome) objectives and approaches applicable to health in spatial planning and development policies and practice.

Introduction: There is an established body of academic and gray literature addressing environmental net-outcome objectives, such as biodiversity net gain, in spatial planning policies and practice. A "health net gain" objective has recently been proposed as a driver for health protection and the realization of health. Such an objective and approach are yet to be scoped and defined.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider sources in the scientific and gray literature that describe health net-outcome objectives that can be implemented in spatial planning and development policies and practice. Source contexts will not be limited to specific countries, geographical areas, or settings. All types of evidence will be considered.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Databases to be searched include PsycINFO (APA), Embase, HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, and selected databases from the ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection. Sources of gray literature to be searched include ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, TRIP Pro, and BASE. No language or date restrictions will be applied. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and review full-text studies and extract data. The results will be presented in tabular or diagrammatic format with a narrative summary.

Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4dbcm.

查看原文本刊更多论文

空间规划和发展的健康净收益目标和方法：范围界定审查协议。

目标：本范围界定综述旨在回顾有关净收益和无净损失（净结果）目标的知识体系，以及适用于空间规划与发展政策和实践中健康问题的方法：在空间规划政策和实践中，已有大量学术和灰色文献涉及环境净收益目标，如生物多样性净收益。最近提出了 "健康净收益 "目标，作为保护健康和实现健康的驱动力。这种目标和方法的范围和定义尚待确定：本综述将考虑科学和灰色文献中描述可在空间规划和发展政策与实践中实施的健康净收益目标的来源。来源背景将不限于特定国家、地理区域或环境。方法：本综述将采用 JBI 的方法进行范围界定综述。要检索的数据库包括 PsycINFO (APA)、Embase、HMIC Health Management Information Consortium、MEDLINE (Ovid)、Scopus 以及 ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection 中的部分数据库。要检索的灰色文献来源包括 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses、TRIP Pro 和 BASE。检索不受语言或日期限制。两名独立审稿人将检索和审阅研究报告全文并提取数据。结果将以表格或图表的形式呈现，并附有叙述性摘要：开放科学框架 https://osf.io/4dbcm。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

3.70%

发文量

218