Provider Adoption of mHealth in Rural Patient Care: Web-Based Survey Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.2196/55443
Bryan P Weichelt, Rick Burke, Burney Kieke, Matt Pilz, Neel Shimpi
{"title":"Provider Adoption of mHealth in Rural Patient Care: Web-Based Survey Study.","authors":"Bryan P Weichelt, Rick Burke, Burney Kieke, Matt Pilz, Neel Shimpi","doi":"10.2196/55443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians and patient-facing caregivers have increasingly used mobile health (mHealth) technologies in the past several years, accelerating during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, barriers and feedback surrounding adoption remain relatively understudied and varied across health systems, particularly in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to identify provider adoption, attitudes, and barriers toward mHealth in a large, multisite, rural US health care system. We investigated (1) mHealth apps that providers use for their own benefit and (2) mHealth apps that a provider uses in conjunction with a patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed all patient-seeing providers within the Marshfield Clinic Health System with a brief, 16-item, web-based survey assessing attitudes toward mHealth, adoption of these technologies, and perceived barriers faced by providers, their peers, and the institution. Survey results were summarized via descriptive statistics, with log-binomial regression and accompanying pairwise analyses, using Kruskal-Wallis and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests for significance, respectively. Respondents were grouped by reported clinical role and specialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received a 38% (n/N=916/2410) response rate, with 60.7% (n=556) of those sufficiently complete for analyses. Roughly 54.1% (n=301) of respondents reported mHealth use, primarily around decision-making and supplemental information, with use differing based on provider role and years of experience. Self-reported barriers to using mHealth included a lack of knowledge and time to study mHealth technologies. Providers also reported concerns about patients' internet access and the complexity of mHealth apps to adequately use mHealth technologies. Providers believed the health system's barriers were largely privacy, confidentiality, and legal review concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings echo similar studies in other health systems, surrounding providers' lack of time and concerns over privacy and confidentiality of patient data. Providers emphasized concerns over the complexity of these technologies for their patients and concerns over patients' internet access to fully use mHealth in their delivery of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e55443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians and patient-facing caregivers have increasingly used mobile health (mHealth) technologies in the past several years, accelerating during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, barriers and feedback surrounding adoption remain relatively understudied and varied across health systems, particularly in rural areas.

Objective: This study aims to identify provider adoption, attitudes, and barriers toward mHealth in a large, multisite, rural US health care system. We investigated (1) mHealth apps that providers use for their own benefit and (2) mHealth apps that a provider uses in conjunction with a patient.

Methods: We surveyed all patient-seeing providers within the Marshfield Clinic Health System with a brief, 16-item, web-based survey assessing attitudes toward mHealth, adoption of these technologies, and perceived barriers faced by providers, their peers, and the institution. Survey results were summarized via descriptive statistics, with log-binomial regression and accompanying pairwise analyses, using Kruskal-Wallis and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests for significance, respectively. Respondents were grouped by reported clinical role and specialty.

Results: We received a 38% (n/N=916/2410) response rate, with 60.7% (n=556) of those sufficiently complete for analyses. Roughly 54.1% (n=301) of respondents reported mHealth use, primarily around decision-making and supplemental information, with use differing based on provider role and years of experience. Self-reported barriers to using mHealth included a lack of knowledge and time to study mHealth technologies. Providers also reported concerns about patients' internet access and the complexity of mHealth apps to adequately use mHealth technologies. Providers believed the health system's barriers were largely privacy, confidentiality, and legal review concerns.

Conclusions: These findings echo similar studies in other health systems, surrounding providers' lack of time and concerns over privacy and confidentiality of patient data. Providers emphasized concerns over the complexity of these technologies for their patients and concerns over patients' internet access to fully use mHealth in their delivery of care.

医疗服务提供者在农村患者护理中采用移动医疗的情况:基于网络的调查研究。
背景:在过去几年中,医生和面向患者的护理人员越来越多地使用移动医疗(mHealth)技术,并在 COVID-19 大流行期间加速发展。然而,有关采用移动医疗技术的障碍和反馈仍未得到充分研究,而且各医疗系统的情况也不尽相同,尤其是在农村地区:本研究旨在确定美国一个大型、多站点、农村医疗保健系统中的医疗服务提供者对移动医疗的采用情况、态度和障碍。我们调查了(1)医疗服务提供者为自身利益而使用的移动医疗应用程序;(2)医疗服务提供者与患者共同使用的移动医疗应用程序:我们对马什菲尔德诊所医疗系统内所有为患者看病的医疗服务提供者进行了一项简短的、包含 16 个项目的网络调查,评估他们对移动医疗的态度、对这些技术的采用情况,以及医疗服务提供者、他们的同行和医疗机构所面临的障碍。调查结果通过描述性统计、对数二项式回归和相应的配对分析进行总结,并分别使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Jonckheere-Terpstra 进行显著性检验。受访者按临床角色和专业分组:我们收到的回复率为 38%(n/N=916/2410),其中 60.7%(n=556)的回复足以进行分析。约 54.1%(n=301)的受访者表示使用过移动医疗,主要是在决策和补充信息方面,使用情况因医疗服务提供者的角色和工作年限而异。自我报告的使用移动医疗的障碍包括缺乏研究移动医疗技术的知识和时间。医疗服务提供者还对患者的互联网接入和移动医疗应用程序的复杂性表示担忧,担心无法充分使用移动医疗技术。医疗服务提供者认为,医疗系统的障碍主要是隐私、保密和法律审查方面的问题:这些发现与其他医疗系统的类似研究结果一致,都是围绕医疗服务提供者缺乏时间以及对患者数据隐私和保密性的担忧。医疗服务提供者强调,他们担心这些技术对病人来说太复杂,也担心病人无法上网,无法在提供医疗服务时充分利用移动医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信