Strength and muscle mass development after a resistance-training period at terrestrial and normobaric intermittent hypoxia.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
C Benavente, P Padial, B R Scott, F Almeida, G Olcina, S Pérez-Regalado, B Feriche
{"title":"Strength and muscle mass development after a resistance-training period at terrestrial and normobaric intermittent hypoxia.","authors":"C Benavente, P Padial, B R Scott, F Almeida, G Olcina, S Pérez-Regalado, B Feriche","doi":"10.1007/s00424-024-02978-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effect of a resistance training (R<sub>T</sub>) period at terrestrial (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH) on both muscle hypertrophy and maximal strength development with respect to the same training in normoxia (N). Thirty-three strength-trained males were assigned to N (FiO<sub>2</sub> = 20.9%), HH (2,320 m asl) or NH (FiO<sub>2</sub> = 15.9%). The participants completed an 8-week R<sub>T</sub> program (3 sessions/week) of a full body routine. Muscle thickness of the lower limb and 1RM in back squat were assessed before and after the training program. Blood markers of stress, inflammation (IL-6) and muscle growth (% active mTOR, myostatin and miRNA-206) were measured before and after the first and last session of the program. Findings revealed all groups improved 1RM, though this was most enhanced by R<sub>T</sub> in NH (p = 0.026). According to the moderate to large excess of the exercise-induced stress response (lactate and Ca<sup>2+</sup>) in HH and N, results only displayed increases in muscle thickness in these two conditions over NH (ES > 1.22). Compared with the rest of the environmental conditions, small to large increments in % active mTOR were only found in HH, and IL-6, myostatin and miR-206 in NH throughout the training period. In conclusion, the results do not support the expected additional benefit of R<sub>T</sub> under hypoxia compared to N on muscle growth, although it seems to favour gains in strength. The greater muscle growth achieved in HH over NH confirms the impact of the type of hypoxia on the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19954,"journal":{"name":"Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-024-02978-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of a resistance training (RT) period at terrestrial (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH) on both muscle hypertrophy and maximal strength development with respect to the same training in normoxia (N). Thirty-three strength-trained males were assigned to N (FiO2 = 20.9%), HH (2,320 m asl) or NH (FiO2 = 15.9%). The participants completed an 8-week RT program (3 sessions/week) of a full body routine. Muscle thickness of the lower limb and 1RM in back squat were assessed before and after the training program. Blood markers of stress, inflammation (IL-6) and muscle growth (% active mTOR, myostatin and miRNA-206) were measured before and after the first and last session of the program. Findings revealed all groups improved 1RM, though this was most enhanced by RT in NH (p = 0.026). According to the moderate to large excess of the exercise-induced stress response (lactate and Ca2+) in HH and N, results only displayed increases in muscle thickness in these two conditions over NH (ES > 1.22). Compared with the rest of the environmental conditions, small to large increments in % active mTOR were only found in HH, and IL-6, myostatin and miR-206 in NH throughout the training period. In conclusion, the results do not support the expected additional benefit of RT under hypoxia compared to N on muscle growth, although it seems to favour gains in strength. The greater muscle growth achieved in HH over NH confirms the impact of the type of hypoxia on the outcomes.

Abstract Image

在陆地和常压间歇缺氧条件下进行阻力训练后的力量和肌肉质量发展。
本研究调查了在陆地(HH)和常压缺氧(NH)条件下进行阻力训练(RT)与在常压缺氧(N)条件下进行相同训练对肌肉肥大和最大力量发展的影响。33 名接受过力量训练的男性被分配到 N(FiO2 = 20.9%)、HH(海拔 2320 米)或 NH(FiO2 = 15.9%)。参加者完成了为期 8 周的全身运动 RT 计划(每周 3 次)。在训练计划前后,对下肢肌肉厚度和背蹲的 1RM 进行了评估。在训练计划第一节和最后一节前后,测量了压力、炎症(IL-6)和肌肉生长(活性 mTOR、肌促蛋白和 miRNA-206 的百分比)的血液指标。研究结果显示,所有组别都提高了 1RM 值,但在 NH 组中,RT 的提高幅度最大(p = 0.026)。由于 HH 和 N 中运动诱导的应激反应(乳酸和 Ca2+)中度到大量过剩,结果显示这两种条件下的肌肉厚度仅比 NH 增加(ES > 1.22)。与其他环境条件相比,在整个训练期间,只有在 HH 中发现活性 mTOR 的百分比有小幅到大幅增加,在 NH 中发现 IL-6、肌生长激素和 miR-206 的百分比有小幅到大幅增加。总之,结果并不支持在缺氧条件下 RT 比 N 对肌肉生长的预期额外益处,尽管它似乎有利于力量的增长。与 NH 相比,HH 实现了更大的肌肉增长,这证实了缺氧类型对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology publishes those results of original research that are seen as advancing the physiological sciences, especially those providing mechanistic insights into physiological functions at the molecular and cellular level, and clearly conveying a physiological message. Submissions are encouraged that deal with the evaluation of molecular and cellular mechanisms of disease, ideally resulting in translational research. Purely descriptive papers covering applied physiology or clinical papers will be excluded. Papers on methodological topics will be considered if they contribute to the development of novel tools for further investigation of (patho)physiological mechanisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信