A single center analysis of long-term outcomes and survival related risk factors in liver retransplantation.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-21 DOI:10.21037/hbsn-23-178
Zhihao Li, Yi Ping Sng, Chao-Long Chen, Chih-Che Lin, Shih-Ho Wang, Chee-Chien Yong
{"title":"A single center analysis of long-term outcomes and survival related risk factors in liver retransplantation.","authors":"Zhihao Li, Yi Ping Sng, Chao-Long Chen, Chih-Che Lin, Shih-Ho Wang, Chee-Chien Yong","doi":"10.21037/hbsn-23-178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver retransplant is the only option to save a patient with liver graft failure. However, it is controversial due to its poor survival outcome compared to primary transplantation. Insufficient deceased organ donation in Taiwan leads to high waitlist mortality. Hence, living-donor grafts offer a valuable alternative for retransplantation. This study aims to analyze the single center's outcome in living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) as well as the survival related confounding risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single center retrospective study including 32 adults who underwent liver retransplantation (re-LT) from June 2002 to April 2020. The cohort was divided into a re-LDLT and a re-DDLT group and survival outcomes were analyzed. Patient outcomes over different periods, the effect of timing on survival, and multivariate analysis for risk factors were also demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 32 retransplantations, the re-LDLT group (n=11) received grafts from younger donors (31.3 <i>vs.</i> 43.75 years, P=0.016), with lower graft weights (688 <i>vs.</i> 1,457.2 g, P<0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (45 <i>vs.</i> 313 min, P<0.001). The 5-year survival was significantly better in the re-LDLT group than in the re-DDLT group (100% <i>vs.</i> 70.8%, P=0.02). This difference was adjusted when only retransplantation after 2010 was analyzed. Further analysis showed that the timing of retransplantation (early <i>vs.</i> late) did not affect patient survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) and intraoperative blood transfusion were related to poor long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retransplantation with living donor graft demonstrated good long-term outcomes with acceptable complications to both recipient and donor. It may serve as a choice in areas lacking deceased donors. The timing of retransplantation did not affect the long-term survival. Further effort should be made to reduce WIT and massive blood transfusion as they contributed to poor survival after retransplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12878,"journal":{"name":"Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11190508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-23-178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver retransplant is the only option to save a patient with liver graft failure. However, it is controversial due to its poor survival outcome compared to primary transplantation. Insufficient deceased organ donation in Taiwan leads to high waitlist mortality. Hence, living-donor grafts offer a valuable alternative for retransplantation. This study aims to analyze the single center's outcome in living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) as well as the survival related confounding risk factors.

Methods: This is a single center retrospective study including 32 adults who underwent liver retransplantation (re-LT) from June 2002 to April 2020. The cohort was divided into a re-LDLT and a re-DDLT group and survival outcomes were analyzed. Patient outcomes over different periods, the effect of timing on survival, and multivariate analysis for risk factors were also demonstrated.

Results: Of the 32 retransplantations, the re-LDLT group (n=11) received grafts from younger donors (31.3 vs. 43.75 years, P=0.016), with lower graft weights (688 vs. 1,457.2 g, P<0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (45 vs. 313 min, P<0.001). The 5-year survival was significantly better in the re-LDLT group than in the re-DDLT group (100% vs. 70.8%, P=0.02). This difference was adjusted when only retransplantation after 2010 was analyzed. Further analysis showed that the timing of retransplantation (early vs. late) did not affect patient survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) and intraoperative blood transfusion were related to poor long-term survival.

Conclusions: Retransplantation with living donor graft demonstrated good long-term outcomes with acceptable complications to both recipient and donor. It may serve as a choice in areas lacking deceased donors. The timing of retransplantation did not affect the long-term survival. Further effort should be made to reduce WIT and massive blood transfusion as they contributed to poor survival after retransplantation.

单中心分析肝脏再移植的长期疗效和与存活相关的风险因素。
背景:肝脏再移植是挽救肝脏移植失败患者的唯一选择。然而,与初次移植相比,肝脏再移植的存活率较低,因此备受争议。台湾的死亡器官捐赠不足,导致等待移植的死亡率很高。因此,活体移植为再移植提供了一个宝贵的选择。本研究旨在分析单个中心的活体肝脏再移植(re-LDLT)和死者肝脏再移植(re-DDLT)的结果以及与存活率相关的混杂风险因素:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,包括2002年6月至2020年4月期间接受肝脏再移植(re-LT)的32名成人。研究组被分为再LDLT组和再DDLT组,并对生存结果进行了分析。此外,还对不同时期的患者预后、时间对存活率的影响以及风险因素的多变量分析进行了展示:在32例再移植中,再LDLT组(n=11)接受的移植物来自较年轻的供体(31.3岁对43.75岁,P=0.016),移植物重量较轻(688克对1457.2克,Pvs.313分钟,Pvs.70.8%,P=0.02)。如果只分析2010年后的再移植,这一差异将得到调整。进一步分析表明,再次移植的时间(早期与晚期)并不影响患者的存活率。多变量分析显示,温暖缺血时间(WIT)延长和术中输血与长期存活率较低有关:结论:活体移植物再移植显示出良好的长期疗效,受体和供体的并发症均可接受。结论:活体移植物再移植具有良好的长期疗效,受体和供体的并发症均可接受,可作为缺乏死亡供体地区的一种选择。再移植的时间并不影响长期存活率。由于WIT和大量输血导致再移植后存活率较低,因此应进一步努力减少WIT和大量输血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
10.00%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition (HBSN) is a bi-monthly, open-access, peer-reviewed journal (Print ISSN: 2304-3881; Online ISSN: 2304-389X) since December 2012. The journal focuses on hepatopancreatobiliary disease and nutrition, aiming to present new findings and deliver up-to-date, practical information on diagnosis, prevention, and clinical investigations. Areas of interest cover surgical techniques, clinical and basic research, transplantation, therapies, NASH, NAFLD, targeted drugs, gut microbiota, metabolism, cancer immunity, genomics, and nutrition and dietetics. HBSN serves as a valuable resource for professionals seeking insights into diverse aspects of hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信