Reach and effectiveness of a non-university cardio-obstetrics program.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Retu Saxena, Gretchen Benson, Abbey C Sidebottom, Brynn Okeson, Joy Hayes, Kirsten Shaw, Courtney Jordan-Baechler, William Wagner
{"title":"Reach and effectiveness of a non-university cardio-obstetrics program.","authors":"Retu Saxena, Gretchen Benson, Abbey C Sidebottom, Brynn Okeson, Joy Hayes, Kirsten Shaw, Courtney Jordan-Baechler, William Wagner","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2367090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend multidisciplinary cardiovascular obstetric programs (CVOB) to manage complex pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease. Minimal evaluation of these programs exists, with most of these programs offered at university-based centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 113 patients managed by a CVOB team at a non-university health system (2018-2019) were compared to 338 patients seen by cardiology prior to the program (2016-2017). CVOB patients were matched with comparison patients (controls) on modified World Health Organization (mWHO) category classification, yielding a cohort of 102 CVOB and 102 controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CVOB patients were more ethnically diverse and cardiovascular risk was higher compared to controls based on mWHO ≥ II-III (57% vs 17%) and. After matching, CVOB patients had more cardiology tests during pregnancy (median of 8 tests vs 5, <i>p</i> < .001) and were more likely to receive telemetry care (32% vs 19%, <i>p</i> = .025). The median number of perinatology visits was significantly higher in the CVOB group (8 vs 2, <i>p</i> < .001). Length of stay was a half day longer for vaginal delivery patients in the CVOB group (median 2.66 vs 2.13, <i>p</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a CVOB program resulted in a more diverse patient population than previously referred to cardiology. The CVOB program participants also experienced a higher level of care in terms of increased cardiovascular testing, monitoring, care from specialists, and appropriate use of medications during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"2367090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2367090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend multidisciplinary cardiovascular obstetric programs (CVOB) to manage complex pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease. Minimal evaluation of these programs exists, with most of these programs offered at university-based centers.

Methods: A cohort of 113 patients managed by a CVOB team at a non-university health system (2018-2019) were compared to 338 patients seen by cardiology prior to the program (2016-2017). CVOB patients were matched with comparison patients (controls) on modified World Health Organization (mWHO) category classification, yielding a cohort of 102 CVOB and 102 controls.

Results: CVOB patients were more ethnically diverse and cardiovascular risk was higher compared to controls based on mWHO ≥ II-III (57% vs 17%) and. After matching, CVOB patients had more cardiology tests during pregnancy (median of 8 tests vs 5, p < .001) and were more likely to receive telemetry care (32% vs 19%, p = .025). The median number of perinatology visits was significantly higher in the CVOB group (8 vs 2, p < .001). Length of stay was a half day longer for vaginal delivery patients in the CVOB group (median 2.66 vs 2.13, p = .006).

Conclusion: Implementation of a CVOB program resulted in a more diverse patient population than previously referred to cardiology. The CVOB program participants also experienced a higher level of care in terms of increased cardiovascular testing, monitoring, care from specialists, and appropriate use of medications during pregnancy.

非大学心肺产科课程的覆盖面和有效性。
背景:目前的指南建议采用多学科心血管产科计划(CVOB)来管理患有心血管疾病的复杂孕妇。对这些项目的评估极少,这些项目大多由大学中心提供:将一个非大学医疗系统的 CVOB 团队(2018-2019 年)管理的 113 名患者队列与该计划之前(2016-2017 年)由心脏病科就诊的 338 名患者进行比较。根据修改后的世界卫生组织(mWHO)类别分类,将CVOB患者与对比患者(对照组)进行配对,得出102名CVOB患者和102名对照组患者:根据 mWHO ≥ II-III 级分类,CVOB 患者的种族更加多样化,与对照组相比,CVOB 患者的心血管风险更高(57% 对 17%)。匹配后,CVOB 患者在孕期接受的心脏病学检查次数更多(中位数为 8 次,对照组为 5 次,P = 025)。CVOB组围产期就诊次数的中位数明显高于CVOB组(8次对2次,P = .006):结论:实施 CVOB 计划后,转诊到心脏科的患者群体比以前更加多样化。结论:CVOB 计划的实施使患者群体比以前转诊到心脏科的患者更加多样化。CVOB 计划的参与者在增加心血管检测、监测、专家护理和孕期合理用药方面也得到了更高水平的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信