Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Maximilian Davide Broda, Petra Borovska, Benjamin de Haas
{"title":"Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades.","authors":"Maximilian Davide Broda, Petra Borovska, Benjamin de Haas","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.6.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans saccade to faces in their periphery faster than to other types of objects. Previous research has highlighted the potential importance of the upper face region in this phenomenon, but it remains unclear whether this is driven by the eye region. Similarly, it remains unclear whether such rapid saccades are exclusive to faces or generalize to other semantically salient stimuli. Furthermore, it is unknown whether individuals differ in their face-specific saccadic reaction times and, if so, whether such differences could be linked to differences in face fixations during free viewing. To explore these open questions, we invited 77 participants to perform a saccadic choice task in which we contrasted faces as well as other salient objects, particularly isolated face features and text, with cars. Additionally, participants freely viewed 700 images of complex natural scenes in a separate session, which allowed us to determine the individual proportion of first fixations falling on faces. For the saccadic choice task, we found advantages for all categories of interest over cars. However, this effect was most pronounced for images of full faces. Full faces also elicited faster saccades compared with eyes, showing that isolated eye regions are not sufficient to elicit face-like responses. Additionally, we found consistent individual differences in saccadic reaction times toward faces that weakly correlated with face salience during free viewing. Our results suggest a link between semantic salience and rapid detection, but underscore the unique status of faces. Further research is needed to resolve the mechanisms underlying rapid face saccades.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"24 6","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11204136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.6.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans saccade to faces in their periphery faster than to other types of objects. Previous research has highlighted the potential importance of the upper face region in this phenomenon, but it remains unclear whether this is driven by the eye region. Similarly, it remains unclear whether such rapid saccades are exclusive to faces or generalize to other semantically salient stimuli. Furthermore, it is unknown whether individuals differ in their face-specific saccadic reaction times and, if so, whether such differences could be linked to differences in face fixations during free viewing. To explore these open questions, we invited 77 participants to perform a saccadic choice task in which we contrasted faces as well as other salient objects, particularly isolated face features and text, with cars. Additionally, participants freely viewed 700 images of complex natural scenes in a separate session, which allowed us to determine the individual proportion of first fixations falling on faces. For the saccadic choice task, we found advantages for all categories of interest over cars. However, this effect was most pronounced for images of full faces. Full faces also elicited faster saccades compared with eyes, showing that isolated eye regions are not sufficient to elicit face-like responses. Additionally, we found consistent individual differences in saccadic reaction times toward faces that weakly correlated with face salience during free viewing. Our results suggest a link between semantic salience and rapid detection, but underscore the unique status of faces. Further research is needed to resolve the mechanisms underlying rapid face saccades.

面孔突出度和快速面孔囊视的个体差异。
与其他类型的物体相比,人类对其外围的人脸进行眼跳的速度更快。先前的研究强调了脸部上部区域在这一现象中的潜在重要性,但目前仍不清楚这是否是由眼部区域驱动的。同样,目前还不清楚这种快速的眼球移动是只针对人脸,还是会泛化到其他语义突出的刺激物上。此外,我们还不清楚个体在特定于人脸的囊回反应时间上是否存在差异,如果存在差异,这种差异是否与自由观看时人脸固定的差异有关。为了探究这些开放性问题,我们邀请 77 名参与者进行了一项囊回选择任务,在这项任务中,我们将人脸以及其他突出物体(尤其是孤立的人脸特征和文字)与汽车进行了对比。此外,受试者还在另一个环节中自由观看了 700 张复杂自然场景的图像,这使我们能够确定首次定格在人脸上的个体比例。在眼动选择任务中,我们发现所有感兴趣的类别都比汽车更有优势。然而,这种效应在完整的人脸图像中最为明显。与眼睛相比,完整的人脸也能引起更快的囊回,这表明孤立的眼睛区域不足以引起类似人脸的反应。此外,我们还发现,在自由观看过程中,对人脸的囊回反应时间与人脸显著性的相关性很弱,但却存在一致的个体差异。我们的研究结果表明语义显著性与快速检测之间存在联系,但也强调了人脸的独特地位。我们还需要进一步的研究来了解人脸快速眼动的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信