Effect of ambulatory mobility aid devices on cardiovascular parameters, walking speed, perceived exertion, and balance of older adult men in Enugu, Nigeria.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241262250
Uchechukwu A Ezugwu, Barbra M Eze, Rita N Ojide, Deborah N Alegu, Patricia C Ngwakwe, Nwamaka A Elom, Christian I Ogah, Ignatius O Nwimo
{"title":"Effect of ambulatory mobility aid devices on cardiovascular parameters, walking speed, perceived exertion, and balance of older adult men in Enugu, Nigeria.","authors":"Uchechukwu A Ezugwu, Barbra M Eze, Rita N Ojide, Deborah N Alegu, Patricia C Ngwakwe, Nwamaka A Elom, Christian I Ogah, Ignatius O Nwimo","doi":"10.1177/20503121241262250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ambulatory mobility aids are several devices the elderly may use in order to improve their walking pattern, balance, or safety while mobilizing independently.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effect of ambulatory mobility aid devices on cardiovascular parameters, walking speed, perceived exertion, and balance of older adult men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 156 old men was studied. Data were obtained through measurement of the participants' walking speed (distance covered/second), cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure), perceived exertion (difficulty or ease in breathing), and balance (ease in standing) after walking with and without the selected walking aid devices. Analysis was done to compare the effect of the walking aid devices on the selected dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed ambulation with mobility aid devices resulted in increase in the heart rate and blood pressure with the greatest increase observed when walking with Zimmer frame. Ambulation with mobility aid devices resulted in decrease of the walking speed of the participants when compared to ambulation without devices. Perceived exertion of participants after using Zimmer frame and walking cane was within 4.06 ± 1.35 and 3.98 ± 1.26, respectively, as opposed to 3.08 ± 0.73 after ambulation without aid. Use of Zimmer frame provided enough balance for participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ambulatory mobility devices caused difference in cardiovascular parameters when compared to ambulation at rest and without aid. It was recommended that selection of ambulatory mobility aid devices should depend on objective mobility assessments and periodical re-evaluation to ensure that it suits a person's functional requirements and physical capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241262250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ambulatory mobility aids are several devices the elderly may use in order to improve their walking pattern, balance, or safety while mobilizing independently.

Objectives: To assess the effect of ambulatory mobility aid devices on cardiovascular parameters, walking speed, perceived exertion, and balance of older adult men.

Methods: A sample of 156 old men was studied. Data were obtained through measurement of the participants' walking speed (distance covered/second), cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure), perceived exertion (difficulty or ease in breathing), and balance (ease in standing) after walking with and without the selected walking aid devices. Analysis was done to compare the effect of the walking aid devices on the selected dependent variables.

Results: Results showed ambulation with mobility aid devices resulted in increase in the heart rate and blood pressure with the greatest increase observed when walking with Zimmer frame. Ambulation with mobility aid devices resulted in decrease of the walking speed of the participants when compared to ambulation without devices. Perceived exertion of participants after using Zimmer frame and walking cane was within 4.06 ± 1.35 and 3.98 ± 1.26, respectively, as opposed to 3.08 ± 0.73 after ambulation without aid. Use of Zimmer frame provided enough balance for participants.

Conclusion: Ambulatory mobility devices caused difference in cardiovascular parameters when compared to ambulation at rest and without aid. It was recommended that selection of ambulatory mobility aid devices should depend on objective mobility assessments and periodical re-evaluation to ensure that it suits a person's functional requirements and physical capabilities.

移动辅助设备对尼日利亚埃努古老年男性心血管参数、步行速度、感觉到的体力消耗和平衡的影响。
简介助行器是老年人在独立行动时为改善行走方式、平衡或安全而可能使用的几种装置:评估助行器对老年男性心血管参数、行走速度、感觉用力程度和平衡能力的影响:方法:对 156 名老年男性进行了抽样调查。通过测量参与者在使用和不使用所选助行器行走后的行走速度(行走距离/秒)、心血管参数(血压)、体力消耗感知(呼吸困难或轻松)和平衡感(站立是否轻松)获得数据。分析比较了助行器对选定因变量的影响:结果表明,使用助行器具行走会导致心率和血压升高,使用齐默尔框架行走时心率和血压升高幅度最大。与不使用助行器的情况相比,使用助行器的情况导致参与者行走速度下降。使用齐默尔助行架和手杖后,受试者的体力消耗感知分别为(4.06 ± 1.35)和(3.98 ± 1.26),而不使用助行器械后,受试者的体力消耗感知为(3.08 ± 0.73)。使用齐默尔框架为参与者提供了足够的平衡:结论:与静止时和无辅助工具时相比,助行器具会对心血管参数造成影响。建议在选择助行器具时,应进行客观的移动能力评估,并定期进行重新评估,以确保其适合个人的功能要求和身体能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信