Effect of Saffron Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in Treatment of Depression and Anxiety: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Arman Shafiee, Kyana Jafarabady, Niloofar Seighali, Ida Mohammadi, Shahryar Rajai Firouz Abadi, Faeze Soltani Abhari, Mahmood Bakhtiyari
{"title":"Effect of Saffron Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in Treatment of Depression and Anxiety: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Arman Shafiee, Kyana Jafarabady, Niloofar Seighali, Ida Mohammadi, Shahryar Rajai Firouz Abadi, Faeze Soltani Abhari, Mahmood Bakhtiyari","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Saffron, a natural remedy with potential antidepressant and anxiolytic properties, has gained attention as a potential therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of saffron versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in treating depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, were searched from inception to April 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing saffron intervention with SSRIs in adults with depression or anxiety were included.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Random-effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratio (RRs) with their 95% CIs calculated continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. Meta-analysis of 8 studies assessing depression outcomes revealed a nonsignificant difference between saffron and SSRIs in reducing depressive symptoms (SMD = 0.10l 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.29). Four studies reporting anxiety outcomes showed a nonsignificant difference between saffron and SSRIs in reducing anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.29). With regard to safety, participants receiving saffron had fewer adverse events than the SSRI group (risk difference: -0.06; 95% CI: -0.09, -0.04; I2: 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Saffron could be a potential SSRI alternative to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms with fewer adverse events. Further research with larger sample sizes and in diverse populations is warranted to validate these findings and explore potential moderators of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023443236.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Saffron, a natural remedy with potential antidepressant and anxiolytic properties, has gained attention as a potential therapeutic option.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of saffron versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in treating depression and anxiety.

Data source: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database, were searched from inception to April 31, 2023.

Data extraction: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing saffron intervention with SSRIs in adults with depression or anxiety were included.

Data analysis: Random-effects meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratio (RRs) with their 95% CIs calculated continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. Meta-analysis of 8 studies assessing depression outcomes revealed a nonsignificant difference between saffron and SSRIs in reducing depressive symptoms (SMD = 0.10l 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.29). Four studies reporting anxiety outcomes showed a nonsignificant difference between saffron and SSRIs in reducing anxiety symptoms (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.29). With regard to safety, participants receiving saffron had fewer adverse events than the SSRI group (risk difference: -0.06; 95% CI: -0.09, -0.04; I2: 0%).

Conclusion: Saffron could be a potential SSRI alternative to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms with fewer adverse events. Further research with larger sample sizes and in diverse populations is warranted to validate these findings and explore potential moderators of treatment response.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023443236.

藏红花与选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)在治疗抑郁症和焦虑症方面的效果:随机对照试验 Meta 分析》。
背景:藏红花是一种具有潜在抗抑郁和抗焦虑作用的天然药物,作为一种潜在的治疗选择已受到人们的关注:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估藏红花与选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)在治疗抑郁症和焦虑症方面的疗效比较:检索了从开始到2023年4月31日的电子数据库,包括PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库:数据分析:随机效应荟萃分析采用标准化均值差异(SMDs)和风险比(RRs)及其 95% CIs,分别计算连续结果和二元结果。对 8 项评估抑郁结果的研究进行的元分析表明,藏红花和 SSRIs 在减少抑郁症状方面的差异不显著(SMD = 0.10l 95% CI:-0.09 至 0.29)。四项报告焦虑结果的研究显示,藏红花和 SSRIs 在减轻焦虑症状方面的差异不显著(SMD = 0.04;95% CI:-0.22 至 0.29)。在安全性方面,接受藏红花治疗的参与者发生的不良事件少于SSRI组(风险差异:-0.06;95% CI:-0.09,-0.04;I2:0%):藏红花可作为一种潜在的 SSRI 替代品,在减少不良反应的同时减轻抑郁和焦虑症状。有必要在不同人群中开展样本量更大的进一步研究,以验证这些发现并探索治疗反应的潜在调节因素:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 注册号CRD42023443236。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信