Rare Event Approximation Between Subdistribution Hazard Ratio and Cause-specific Hazard Ratio in Survival Analysis With Competing Risks.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 Epub Date: 2024-10-31 DOI:10.2188/jea.JE20240063
Shiro Tanaka
{"title":"Rare Event Approximation Between Subdistribution Hazard Ratio and Cause-specific Hazard Ratio in Survival Analysis With Competing Risks.","authors":"Shiro Tanaka","doi":"10.2188/jea.JE20240063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the fact that competing risks are inevitable in epidemiological and clinical studies, distinctions between the hazard ratio estimated by handling competing risks as censoring and the subditribution hazard ratio are often overlooked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We derived quantitative relationships between subdistribution hazard ratio and cause-specific hazard ratio and derive an approximate calculation method to transform the two into each other. Numerical examinations of hypothetical six scenarios and published information of a randomized clinical trial of cholesterol-lowering therapy and a registry of acute myeloid leukemia were provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>General and approximate relationships under rare event assumptions between the two types of hazard ratio were given. The approximation formula is based on a survival ratio and has two possible applications. First, one can calculate a subdistribution hazard ratio from published information. Second, this formula allows sample size estimation that takes the presence of competing risks into account.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distinction between the two types of hazard ratio can be addressed by focusing on two quantities. One is how the event of interest and competing risk is rare, and the other is the survival ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":15799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"595-599"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20240063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the fact that competing risks are inevitable in epidemiological and clinical studies, distinctions between the hazard ratio estimated by handling competing risks as censoring and the subditribution hazard ratio are often overlooked.

Methods: We derived quantitative relationships between subdistribution hazard ratio and cause-specific hazard ratio and derive an approximate calculation method to transform the two into each other. Numerical examinations of hypothetical six scenarios and published information of a randomized clinical trial of cholesterol-lowering therapy and a registry of acute myeloid leukemia were provided.

Results: General and approximate relationships under rare event assumptions between the two types of hazard ratio were given. The approximation formula is based on a survival ratio and has two possible applications. First, one can calculate a subdistribution hazard ratio from published information. Second, this formula allows sample size estimation that takes the presence of competing risks into account.

Conclusion: The distinction between the two types of hazard ratio can be addressed by focusing on two quantities. One is how the event of interest and competing risk is rare, and the other is the survival ratio.

在有竞争风险的生存分析中,子分布危险比和特定原因危险比之间的罕见事件近似。
背景尽管在流行病学和临床研究中竞争风险是不可避免的,但将竞争风险作为普查来处理所估计的危害比与亚分布危害比之间的区别却常常被忽视。方法我们推导了亚分布危害比与特定病因危害比之间的定量关系,并推导了将两者相互转化的近似计算方法。结果在罕见事件假设下,给出了两种危险比之间的一般关系和近似关系。近似公式以生存率为基础,有两种可能的应用。首先,人们可以根据已公布的信息计算亚分布危险比。其次,该公式可以在考虑到竞争风险的情况下进行样本量估算。一个是相关事件和竞争风险的罕见程度,另一个是存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology
Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology is the official open access scientific journal of the Japan Epidemiological Association. The Journal publishes a broad range of original research on epidemiology as it relates to human health, and aims to promote communication among those engaged in the field of epidemiological research and those who use epidemiological findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信