Dose-dependent effect of megestrol acetate supplementation in cancer patients with anorexia–cachexia syndrome: A meta-analysis

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sepide Talebi, Sheida Zeraattalab-Motlagh, Maryam Barkhordar, Mohammad Vaezi, Seyed Mojtaba Ghoreishy, Abed Ghavami, Yasaman Hosseini, Nikolaj Travica, Hamed Mohammadi
{"title":"Dose-dependent effect of megestrol acetate supplementation in cancer patients with anorexia–cachexia syndrome: A meta-analysis","authors":"Sepide Talebi,&nbsp;Sheida Zeraattalab-Motlagh,&nbsp;Maryam Barkhordar,&nbsp;Mohammad Vaezi,&nbsp;Seyed Mojtaba Ghoreishy,&nbsp;Abed Ghavami,&nbsp;Yasaman Hosseini,&nbsp;Nikolaj Travica,&nbsp;Hamed Mohammadi","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is inconsistent evidence relating to the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) supplementation on cancer patients suffering from anorexia–cachexia syndrome. This review aimed to examine the dose–response effect of MA supplementation in patients with cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia. Relevant keywords were searched in PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of Science from inception to June 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of MA on pathologies in patients with cancer-associated cachexia. Our primary outcomes were changes in body weight and appetite. However, fatigue and quality of life were secondary outcomes. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using the random-effects method. Thirteen trials comprising 1229 participants (mean age 60 years) were identified. The results of our highest versus lowest analysis revealed that MA supplementation was not associated with any increase in body weight (MD: 0.64 kg, 95% CI [−0.11, 1.38], <i>P</i> = 0.093, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 69.1%; GRADE = very low certainty). Twelve trials, including 14 effect sizes derived from 1369 patients (intervention = 689, control = 680), provided data on the effect of MA on body weight. Subgroup analyses showed a significant increase in body weight following short-term intervention (≤8 weeks) and a combination of radiation/chemotherapy as concurrent treatment. A linear dose–response meta-analysis indicated that each 200 mg/day increment in MA consumption had a significant increase in weight gain (MD: 0.44; 95% CI [0.13, 0.74], <i>P</i> = 0.005; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97.1%); however, the magnitude of the effect was small. MA administration significantly affected the quality of life based on pooled effect sizes (MD: 1.15, 95% CI [0.76, 1.54], <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>n</i> = 2 RCTs including 176 patients; GRADE = very low certainty). However, no significant effect of MA supplementation was observed on appetite (MD: 0.29, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.64], <i>P</i> = 0.096, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 18.3%; <i>n</i> = 3 RCTs including 163 patients; GRADE = very low certainty) and fatigue (MD: 0.14, 95% CI [−0.09, 0.36], <i>P</i> = 0.236, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; <i>n</i> = 2 RCTs including 300 patients; GRADE = very low certainty). With very low certainty of the evidence, MA supplementation may not lead to a significantly increased weight gain and other outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13500","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is inconsistent evidence relating to the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) supplementation on cancer patients suffering from anorexia–cachexia syndrome. This review aimed to examine the dose–response effect of MA supplementation in patients with cancer-associated anorexia/cachexia. Relevant keywords were searched in PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of Science from inception to June 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of MA on pathologies in patients with cancer-associated cachexia. Our primary outcomes were changes in body weight and appetite. However, fatigue and quality of life were secondary outcomes. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using the random-effects method. Thirteen trials comprising 1229 participants (mean age 60 years) were identified. The results of our highest versus lowest analysis revealed that MA supplementation was not associated with any increase in body weight (MD: 0.64 kg, 95% CI [−0.11, 1.38], P = 0.093, I2 = 69.1%; GRADE = very low certainty). Twelve trials, including 14 effect sizes derived from 1369 patients (intervention = 689, control = 680), provided data on the effect of MA on body weight. Subgroup analyses showed a significant increase in body weight following short-term intervention (≤8 weeks) and a combination of radiation/chemotherapy as concurrent treatment. A linear dose–response meta-analysis indicated that each 200 mg/day increment in MA consumption had a significant increase in weight gain (MD: 0.44; 95% CI [0.13, 0.74], P = 0.005; I2 = 97.1%); however, the magnitude of the effect was small. MA administration significantly affected the quality of life based on pooled effect sizes (MD: 1.15, 95% CI [0.76, 1.54], P < 0.001, I2 = 0%; n = 2 RCTs including 176 patients; GRADE = very low certainty). However, no significant effect of MA supplementation was observed on appetite (MD: 0.29, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.64], P = 0.096, I2 = 18.3%; n = 3 RCTs including 163 patients; GRADE = very low certainty) and fatigue (MD: 0.14, 95% CI [−0.09, 0.36], P = 0.236, I2 = 0%; n = 2 RCTs including 300 patients; GRADE = very low certainty). With very low certainty of the evidence, MA supplementation may not lead to a significantly increased weight gain and other outcomes.

Abstract Image

醋酸甲孕酮补充剂对患有厌食-头痛综合征的癌症患者的剂量依赖性影响:荟萃分析
关于醋酸甲孕酮(MA)补充剂对患有厌食-头痛综合征的癌症患者的影响,目前尚无一致的证据。本综述旨在研究补充醋酸甲孕酮对癌症相关性厌食/头痛患者的剂量反应效应。从开始到 2023 年 6 月,我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 ISI Web of Science 中搜索了相关关键词,以了解研究 MA 对癌症相关恶病质患者病理变化影响的随机对照试验 (RCT)。我们的主要结果是体重和食欲的变化。然而,疲劳和生活质量是次要结果。采用随机效应法估算了平均差(MD)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)。共确定了 13 项试验,包括 1229 名参与者(平均年龄 60 岁)。我们的最高与最低分析结果显示,补充 MA 与体重增加无关(MD:0.64 千克,95% CI [-0.11, 1.38],P = 0.093,I2 = 69.1%;GRADE = 非常低的确定性)。12项试验(包括从1369名患者(干预=689人,对照=680人)中得出的14个效应大小)提供了MA对体重影响的数据。亚组分析显示,短期干预(≤8 周)和放疗/化疗联合治疗后,体重明显增加。线性剂量-反应荟萃分析表明,服用 MA 的剂量每增加 200 毫克/天,体重就会明显增加(MD:0.44;95% CI [0.13,0.74],P = 0.005;I2 = 97.1%);但影响幅度较小。根据汇总效应大小(MD:1.15,95% CI [0.76,1.54],P < 0.001,I2 = 0%;n = 2 项 RCT,包括 176 名患者;GRADE = 非常低的确定性),服用 MA 对生活质量有明显影响。然而,未观察到补充 MA 对食欲(MD:0.29,95% CI [-0.05,0.64],P = 0.096,I2 = 18.3%;n = 3 项 RCT,包括 163 名患者;GRADE = 非常低的确定性)和疲劳(MD:0.14,95% CI [-0.09,0.36],P = 0.236,I2 = 0%;n = 2 项 RCT,包括 300 名患者;GRADE = 非常低的确定性)有明显影响。由于证据的确定性很低,补充 MA 可能不会导致体重增加和其他结果显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信