Clinical application of platelet rich plasma to promote healing of open hand injury with skin defect

IF 3.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Xinhui Du , Jiarui Zhao , Qian Ren , Yibo Ma , Pengxia Duan , Yansheng Huang , Sibo Wang
{"title":"Clinical application of platelet rich plasma to promote healing of open hand injury with skin defect","authors":"Xinhui Du ,&nbsp;Jiarui Zhao ,&nbsp;Qian Ren ,&nbsp;Yibo Ma ,&nbsp;Pengxia Duan ,&nbsp;Yansheng Huang ,&nbsp;Sibo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.reth.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Skin defects caused by open hand trauma are difficult to treat clinically and severely affect the recovery of hand function. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been widely used in the treatment of refractory chronic wounds, but its use in hand trauma skin defects remains scarce.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study compared the outcomes of 27 patients treated with PRP to 31 patients undergoing skin flap transplantation for hand wounds. We assessed several parameters, including healing times, duration of surgery, postoperative pain (VAS score), intraoperative amputation length, finger function, sensation restoration, nail bed preservation, and hospitalization expenses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PRP-treated patients showed a mean healing time of 21.59 ± 3.17 days. Surgical times were significantly shorter in the PRP group (22.04 ± 7.04 min) compared to the flap group (57.45 ± 8.15 min, P &lt; 0.0001). PRP patients experienced longer postoperative healing times (20.15 ± 2.16 days) than those in the skin flap group (12.84 ± 1.08 days, P &lt; 0.0001), but reported lower pain scores (1.3 ± 1.44 vs 2.55 ± 2.06, P = 0.0119). Range of Motion (ROM) at the proximal interphalangeal joint was better in the PRP group (96.26° ± 6.69) compared to the flap group (86.16° ± 15.24, P = 0.0028). Sensory outcomes favored the PRP group, with a two-point discrimination of 2.37 ± 1.34 mm versus 2.52 ± 1.27 mm in the flap group (P = 0.0274). Costs were lower in the PRP group ($2081.6 ± 258.14 vs $2680.18 ± 481.15, P &lt; 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PRP treatment for skin defects from hand trauma is effective, offering advantages in terms of reduced surgical time, pain, and cost, with comparable or superior functional outcomes to flap transplantation. Despite longer healing times, PRP may represent a preferable option for open hand injuries, preserving more nail beds and resulting in better sensation and joint motion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20895,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative Therapy","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 308-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235232042400110X/pdfft?md5=5bc3b69dbcb9bb6ee64bdf2d829fab81&pid=1-s2.0-S235232042400110X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235232042400110X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Skin defects caused by open hand trauma are difficult to treat clinically and severely affect the recovery of hand function. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been widely used in the treatment of refractory chronic wounds, but its use in hand trauma skin defects remains scarce.

Methods

This study compared the outcomes of 27 patients treated with PRP to 31 patients undergoing skin flap transplantation for hand wounds. We assessed several parameters, including healing times, duration of surgery, postoperative pain (VAS score), intraoperative amputation length, finger function, sensation restoration, nail bed preservation, and hospitalization expenses.

Results

PRP-treated patients showed a mean healing time of 21.59 ± 3.17 days. Surgical times were significantly shorter in the PRP group (22.04 ± 7.04 min) compared to the flap group (57.45 ± 8.15 min, P < 0.0001). PRP patients experienced longer postoperative healing times (20.15 ± 2.16 days) than those in the skin flap group (12.84 ± 1.08 days, P < 0.0001), but reported lower pain scores (1.3 ± 1.44 vs 2.55 ± 2.06, P = 0.0119). Range of Motion (ROM) at the proximal interphalangeal joint was better in the PRP group (96.26° ± 6.69) compared to the flap group (86.16° ± 15.24, P = 0.0028). Sensory outcomes favored the PRP group, with a two-point discrimination of 2.37 ± 1.34 mm versus 2.52 ± 1.27 mm in the flap group (P = 0.0274). Costs were lower in the PRP group ($2081.6 ± 258.14 vs $2680.18 ± 481.15, P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

PRP treatment for skin defects from hand trauma is effective, offering advantages in terms of reduced surgical time, pain, and cost, with comparable or superior functional outcomes to flap transplantation. Despite longer healing times, PRP may represent a preferable option for open hand injuries, preserving more nail beds and resulting in better sensation and joint motion.

富血小板血浆在促进伴有皮肤缺损的手部开放性损伤愈合中的临床应用
背景手部开放性创伤导致的皮肤缺损很难进行临床治疗,严重影响手部功能的恢复。自体富血小板血浆(PRP)已被广泛用于治疗难治性慢性伤口,但其在手部创伤皮肤缺损中的应用仍然很少。方法本研究比较了 27 名接受 PRP 治疗的患者与 31 名接受皮瓣移植治疗的手部创伤患者的疗效。我们评估了多项参数,包括愈合时间、手术时间、术后疼痛(VAS 评分)、术中截肢长度、手指功能、感觉恢复、甲床保留和住院费用。PRP 组的手术时间(22.04 ± 7.04 分钟)明显短于皮瓣组(57.45 ± 8.15 分钟,P < 0.0001)。PRP 患者的术后愈合时间(20.15 ± 2.16 天)长于皮瓣组(12.84 ± 1.08 天,P < 0.0001),但疼痛评分较低(1.3 ± 1.44 vs 2.55 ± 2.06,P = 0.0119)。与皮瓣组(86.16° ± 15.24,P = 0.0028)相比,PRP 组近端指间关节的活动范围(ROM)更好(96.26° ± 6.69)。PRP 组的感觉结果更好,两点辨别率为 2.37 ± 1.34 mm,而皮瓣组为 2.52 ± 1.27 mm(P = 0.0274)。PRP组的费用较低(2081.6 ± 258.14 美元 vs 2680.18 ± 481.15 美元,P < 0.0001)。结论PRP治疗手部创伤皮肤缺损效果显著,在缩短手术时间、减轻疼痛和降低费用方面具有优势,其功能效果与皮瓣移植相当或更优。尽管愈合时间较长,但对于开放性手部创伤而言,PRP 可能是一种更可取的选择,它能保留更多的甲床,并带来更好的感觉和关节活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regenerative Therapy
Regenerative Therapy Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Regenerative Therapy is the official peer-reviewed online journal of the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine. Regenerative Therapy is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and reviews of basic research, clinical translation, industrial development, and regulatory issues focusing on stem cell biology, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信