Does Continuous Chemical Disinfection Affect Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM PMMA?

Oscar Oswaldo Marcillo-Toala, Rodrigo Moreira Bringel da Costa, Ana Paula Chappuis-Chocano, Helena Sandrini Venante, Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior, Vanessa Lara, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, Vinicius Carvalho Porto
{"title":"Does Continuous Chemical Disinfection Affect Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM PMMA?","authors":"Oscar Oswaldo Marcillo-Toala, Rodrigo Moreira Bringel da Costa, Ana Paula Chappuis-Chocano, Helena Sandrini Venante, Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior, Vanessa Lara, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, Vinicius Carvalho Porto","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the effect of disinfectants on the roughness and mechanical properties of CAD/ CAM polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dentures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two groups of denture base resins were tested-heat-polymerized and milled blocks. For each resin, 120 specimens were produced for flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM) analyses (total: 240 specimens), and 40 were produced for microhardness and surface roughness evaluations (total: 80 specimens). They were categorized into the following groups based on immersion: control (deionized water); H1 (1% sodium hypochlorite); H05 (0.5% sodium hypochlorite); and C2 (2% chlorhexidine) groups. The immersion periods were 0 (T0), 130 (T1), and 260 (T2) cycles. Statistical analyses were performed for flexural properties using threeway ANOVA. Microhardness (KHN) and surface roughness (Ra) were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. A significance level of 5% was set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAD/CAM PMMA showed higher FS (P = .001) and FM (P < .001) than conventional PMMA. The KHN value was superior to the conventional PMMA (P < .001). The chemical solution affected the surface roughness of both resins (P = .007). The CAD/ CAM PMMA block showed increased Ra values when H1 was used. Cycling separately increased the FS of conventional PMMA (T1 vs baseline; P < .05). However, the FM of CAD/CAM PMMA was higher (T1 and T2 vs baseline; P < .05). The time factor increased the microhardness of both resins (T2 vs baseline; P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAD/CAM resin showed higher values compared to conventional PMMA in all tests, regardless of the chemical solution used; however, the values obtained for both resins were clinically acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":" 3","pages":"319-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the effect of disinfectants on the roughness and mechanical properties of CAD/ CAM polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dentures.

Materials and methods: Two groups of denture base resins were tested-heat-polymerized and milled blocks. For each resin, 120 specimens were produced for flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM) analyses (total: 240 specimens), and 40 were produced for microhardness and surface roughness evaluations (total: 80 specimens). They were categorized into the following groups based on immersion: control (deionized water); H1 (1% sodium hypochlorite); H05 (0.5% sodium hypochlorite); and C2 (2% chlorhexidine) groups. The immersion periods were 0 (T0), 130 (T1), and 260 (T2) cycles. Statistical analyses were performed for flexural properties using threeway ANOVA. Microhardness (KHN) and surface roughness (Ra) were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. A significance level of 5% was set.

Results: CAD/CAM PMMA showed higher FS (P = .001) and FM (P < .001) than conventional PMMA. The KHN value was superior to the conventional PMMA (P < .001). The chemical solution affected the surface roughness of both resins (P = .007). The CAD/ CAM PMMA block showed increased Ra values when H1 was used. Cycling separately increased the FS of conventional PMMA (T1 vs baseline; P < .05). However, the FM of CAD/CAM PMMA was higher (T1 and T2 vs baseline; P < .05). The time factor increased the microhardness of both resins (T2 vs baseline; P < .05).

Conclusions: The CAD/CAM resin showed higher values compared to conventional PMMA in all tests, regardless of the chemical solution used; however, the values obtained for both resins were clinically acceptable.

连续化学消毒会影响 CAD/CAM PMMA 的机械性能吗?
目的:分析消毒剂对 CAD/ CAM 聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿粗糙度和机械性能的影响:测试了两组义齿基托树脂--热聚合块和研磨块。每种树脂都制作了 120 个试样用于抗弯强度(FS)和抗弯模量(FM)分析(共 240 个试样),并制作了 40 个试样用于显微硬度和表面粗糙度评估(共 80 个试样)。根据浸泡情况将试样分为以下几组:对照组(去离子水)、H1 组(1% 次氯酸钠)、H05 组(0.5% 次氯酸钠)和 C2 组(2% 洗必泰)。浸泡周期分别为 0(T0)、130(T1)和 260(T2)次。采用三向方差分析对挠曲性能进行了统计分析。显微硬度(KHN)和表面粗糙度(Ra)采用重复测量方差分析。显著性水平设定为 5%:与传统 PMMA 相比,CAD/CAM PMMA 显示出更高的 FS(P = .001)和 FM(P < .001)。KHN 值优于传统 PMMA(P < .001)。化学溶液影响了两种树脂的表面粗糙度(P = .007)。使用 H1 时,CAD/CAM PMMA 块的 Ra 值增加。循环分别增加了传统 PMMA 的 FS(T1 与基线相比;P < .05)。然而,CAD/CAM PMMA 的 FM 较高(T1 和 T2 与基线对比;P < .05)。时间因素增加了两种树脂的显微硬度(T2 与基线相比;P < .05):结论:与传统 PMMA 相比,CAD/CAM 树脂在所有测试中都显示出更高的数值,无论使用哪种化学溶液;不过,两种树脂获得的数值在临床上都是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信