Oscar Oswaldo Marcillo-Toala, Rodrigo Moreira Bringel da Costa, Ana Paula Chappuis-Chocano, Helena Sandrini Venante, Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior, Vanessa Lara, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, Vinicius Carvalho Porto
{"title":"Does Continuous Chemical Disinfection Affect Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM PMMA?","authors":"Oscar Oswaldo Marcillo-Toala, Rodrigo Moreira Bringel da Costa, Ana Paula Chappuis-Chocano, Helena Sandrini Venante, Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior, Vanessa Lara, Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek, Vinicius Carvalho Porto","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the effect of disinfectants on the roughness and mechanical properties of CAD/ CAM polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dentures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two groups of denture base resins were tested-heat-polymerized and milled blocks. For each resin, 120 specimens were produced for flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM) analyses (total: 240 specimens), and 40 were produced for microhardness and surface roughness evaluations (total: 80 specimens). They were categorized into the following groups based on immersion: control (deionized water); H1 (1% sodium hypochlorite); H05 (0.5% sodium hypochlorite); and C2 (2% chlorhexidine) groups. The immersion periods were 0 (T0), 130 (T1), and 260 (T2) cycles. Statistical analyses were performed for flexural properties using threeway ANOVA. Microhardness (KHN) and surface roughness (Ra) were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. A significance level of 5% was set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAD/CAM PMMA showed higher FS (P = .001) and FM (P < .001) than conventional PMMA. The KHN value was superior to the conventional PMMA (P < .001). The chemical solution affected the surface roughness of both resins (P = .007). The CAD/ CAM PMMA block showed increased Ra values when H1 was used. Cycling separately increased the FS of conventional PMMA (T1 vs baseline; P < .05). However, the FM of CAD/CAM PMMA was higher (T1 and T2 vs baseline; P < .05). The time factor increased the microhardness of both resins (T2 vs baseline; P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAD/CAM resin showed higher values compared to conventional PMMA in all tests, regardless of the chemical solution used; however, the values obtained for both resins were clinically acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":" 3","pages":"319-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the effect of disinfectants on the roughness and mechanical properties of CAD/ CAM polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dentures.
Materials and methods: Two groups of denture base resins were tested-heat-polymerized and milled blocks. For each resin, 120 specimens were produced for flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM) analyses (total: 240 specimens), and 40 were produced for microhardness and surface roughness evaluations (total: 80 specimens). They were categorized into the following groups based on immersion: control (deionized water); H1 (1% sodium hypochlorite); H05 (0.5% sodium hypochlorite); and C2 (2% chlorhexidine) groups. The immersion periods were 0 (T0), 130 (T1), and 260 (T2) cycles. Statistical analyses were performed for flexural properties using threeway ANOVA. Microhardness (KHN) and surface roughness (Ra) were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. A significance level of 5% was set.
Results: CAD/CAM PMMA showed higher FS (P = .001) and FM (P < .001) than conventional PMMA. The KHN value was superior to the conventional PMMA (P < .001). The chemical solution affected the surface roughness of both resins (P = .007). The CAD/ CAM PMMA block showed increased Ra values when H1 was used. Cycling separately increased the FS of conventional PMMA (T1 vs baseline; P < .05). However, the FM of CAD/CAM PMMA was higher (T1 and T2 vs baseline; P < .05). The time factor increased the microhardness of both resins (T2 vs baseline; P < .05).
Conclusions: The CAD/CAM resin showed higher values compared to conventional PMMA in all tests, regardless of the chemical solution used; however, the values obtained for both resins were clinically acceptable.