Tabitha Derr, Daniel W MacDonald, Arthur L Malkani, Michael A Mont, Nicolas S Piuzzi, Steven M Kurtz
{"title":"Oxidation and Damage Mechanisms of Second-Generation Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts.","authors":"Tabitha Derr, Daniel W MacDonald, Arthur L Malkani, Michael A Mont, Nicolas S Piuzzi, Steven M Kurtz","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After clinical introduction in 2005, sequentially annealed, highly cross-linked polyethylene (SA HXLPE) was studied for retrievals with short implantation times; however, long-term follow-ups are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine and compare the revision reasons, damage mechanisms, and oxidation indices of SA HXLPE and conventional gamma inert-sterilized (Gamma Inert) ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene tibial inserts implanted for >5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 74 total knee arthroplasty tibial inserts (46 SA HXLPEs, 28 Gamma Inerts) implanted for >5 years (mean 7 ± 2 years) retrieved as part of a multicenter retrieval program. Cruciate-retaining implants comprised 44% of the SA HXLPEs and 14% of the Gamma Inerts. Patient factors and revision reasons were collected from revision operating notes. A semiquantitative scoring method was used to assess surface damage mechanisms. Oxidation was measured using Fourier transform infrared microscopy according to American Society for Testing and Materials 2102. Differences between cohorts were assessed with Mann-Whitney U-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loosening (Gamma Inert: 17 of 28, SA HXLPE: 15 of 46) and instability (Gamma Inert: 6 of 28, SA HXLPE: 15 of 46) were the most common revision reasons for both cohorts. The most prevalent surface damage mechanisms were burnishing, pitting, and scratching, with burnishing of the condyles being higher in Gamma Inert components (P = .022). Mean oxidation was higher in the SA HXLPE inserts at the articulating surface (P = .002) and anterior-posterior faces (P = .023). No difference was observed at the backside surface (P = .060).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision reasons and surface damage mechanisms were comparable in the Gamma Inert and SA cohorts. Further studies are needed to continue to assess the in vivo damage and clinical relevance, if any, of oxidation in SA HXLPE over longer implantation times, particularly for implants implanted for more than 10 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: After clinical introduction in 2005, sequentially annealed, highly cross-linked polyethylene (SA HXLPE) was studied for retrievals with short implantation times; however, long-term follow-ups are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine and compare the revision reasons, damage mechanisms, and oxidation indices of SA HXLPE and conventional gamma inert-sterilized (Gamma Inert) ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene tibial inserts implanted for >5 years.
Methods: There were 74 total knee arthroplasty tibial inserts (46 SA HXLPEs, 28 Gamma Inerts) implanted for >5 years (mean 7 ± 2 years) retrieved as part of a multicenter retrieval program. Cruciate-retaining implants comprised 44% of the SA HXLPEs and 14% of the Gamma Inerts. Patient factors and revision reasons were collected from revision operating notes. A semiquantitative scoring method was used to assess surface damage mechanisms. Oxidation was measured using Fourier transform infrared microscopy according to American Society for Testing and Materials 2102. Differences between cohorts were assessed with Mann-Whitney U-tests.
Results: Loosening (Gamma Inert: 17 of 28, SA HXLPE: 15 of 46) and instability (Gamma Inert: 6 of 28, SA HXLPE: 15 of 46) were the most common revision reasons for both cohorts. The most prevalent surface damage mechanisms were burnishing, pitting, and scratching, with burnishing of the condyles being higher in Gamma Inert components (P = .022). Mean oxidation was higher in the SA HXLPE inserts at the articulating surface (P = .002) and anterior-posterior faces (P = .023). No difference was observed at the backside surface (P = .060).
Conclusions: Revision reasons and surface damage mechanisms were comparable in the Gamma Inert and SA cohorts. Further studies are needed to continue to assess the in vivo damage and clinical relevance, if any, of oxidation in SA HXLPE over longer implantation times, particularly for implants implanted for more than 10 years.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
