Conservative femoral revision using short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape for selected Paprosky II-IV bone defects: an average seven-year follow-up.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yicheng Li, Xiaogang Zhang, Baochao Ji, Nuerailijiang Yushan, Wuhuzi Wulamu, Xiaobin Guo, Li Cao
{"title":"Conservative femoral revision using short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape for selected Paprosky II-IV bone defects: an average seven-year follow-up.","authors":"Yicheng Li, Xiaogang Zhang, Baochao Ji, Nuerailijiang Yushan, Wuhuzi Wulamu, Xiaobin Guo, Li Cao","doi":"10.1186/s42836-024-00251-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of long stems for severe femoral bone defects is suggested by many scholars, but it is associated with further bone loss, intraoperative fracture, increased surgical trauma, and complications. With better bone retention, simple and quick surgical procedures, and minimal complications, the short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape may be an alternative for femoral revision. This study aimed to evaluate the results of this type of stem in treating selected Paprosky II-IV bone defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 73 patients (76 hips involved) who underwent conservative femoral revision using the short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape between January 2012 and December 2020. The preoperative femoral bone defects were identified as follows: 54 cases of type II, 11 cases of type IIIA, 7 cases of type IIIB, and 4 cases of type IV. Indications for revision included aseptic loosening (76.3%) and prosthetic joint infection (23.7%). Six cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape from three companies were used in all patients. Among them, SLR-Plus, SL-Plus MIA, and Corail stems were employed in most patients (40.8%, 23.7%, and 17.1%, respectively). The average length of these stems measured 171.7 mm (SD 27 mm; 122-215 mm). Radiographic results, Harris hip scores (HHS), complications, and survivorship were analyzed. The follow-up lasted for 7 years on average (range 3-11 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The subsidence was observed in three hips (3.9%), and all stems achieved stable bone ingrowth. Proximal femoral bone restoration in the residual osteolytic area was found in 67 hips (88.2%), constant defects in nine hips (11.8%), and increasing defects in 0 cases. There was no evidence of stem fractures and stem loosening in this series. The mean HHS significantly improved from 32 (range 15-50) preoperatively to 82 (range 68-94) at the last follow-up (t = - 36.297, P < 0.001). Five hips developed prosthesis-related complications, including three infection and two dislocation cases. The mean 5- and 10-year revision-free survivorships for any revision or removal of an implant and reoperation for any reason were 94.6% and 93.3%, respectively. Both mean 5- and 10-year revision-free survivorships for aseptic femoral loosening were 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conservative femoral revision using short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape can provide favorable radiographic outcomes, joint function, and mid-term survivorship with minimal complications. Of note, a sclerotic proximal femoral bone shell with continued and intact structure and enough support strength is the indication for using these stems.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00251-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of long stems for severe femoral bone defects is suggested by many scholars, but it is associated with further bone loss, intraoperative fracture, increased surgical trauma, and complications. With better bone retention, simple and quick surgical procedures, and minimal complications, the short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape may be an alternative for femoral revision. This study aimed to evaluate the results of this type of stem in treating selected Paprosky II-IV bone defects.

Methods: This retrospective study included 73 patients (76 hips involved) who underwent conservative femoral revision using the short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape between January 2012 and December 2020. The preoperative femoral bone defects were identified as follows: 54 cases of type II, 11 cases of type IIIA, 7 cases of type IIIB, and 4 cases of type IV. Indications for revision included aseptic loosening (76.3%) and prosthetic joint infection (23.7%). Six cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape from three companies were used in all patients. Among them, SLR-Plus, SL-Plus MIA, and Corail stems were employed in most patients (40.8%, 23.7%, and 17.1%, respectively). The average length of these stems measured 171.7 mm (SD 27 mm; 122-215 mm). Radiographic results, Harris hip scores (HHS), complications, and survivorship were analyzed. The follow-up lasted for 7 years on average (range 3-11 years).

Results: The subsidence was observed in three hips (3.9%), and all stems achieved stable bone ingrowth. Proximal femoral bone restoration in the residual osteolytic area was found in 67 hips (88.2%), constant defects in nine hips (11.8%), and increasing defects in 0 cases. There was no evidence of stem fractures and stem loosening in this series. The mean HHS significantly improved from 32 (range 15-50) preoperatively to 82 (range 68-94) at the last follow-up (t = - 36.297, P < 0.001). Five hips developed prosthesis-related complications, including three infection and two dislocation cases. The mean 5- and 10-year revision-free survivorships for any revision or removal of an implant and reoperation for any reason were 94.6% and 93.3%, respectively. Both mean 5- and 10-year revision-free survivorships for aseptic femoral loosening were 100%.

Conclusion: Conservative femoral revision using short cementless stems with a tapered rectangular shape can provide favorable radiographic outcomes, joint function, and mid-term survivorship with minimal complications. Of note, a sclerotic proximal femoral bone shell with continued and intact structure and enough support strength is the indication for using these stems.

使用锥形矩形无骨水泥短茎对选定的 Paprosky II-IV 骨缺损进行保守性股骨翻修:平均七年随访。
背景:许多学者建议使用长柄治疗严重的股骨头缺损,但这与进一步的骨丢失、术中骨折、手术创伤增加和并发症有关。锥形矩形无骨水泥短茎具有更好的骨保留性、简单快捷的手术操作和极少的并发症,可能是股骨翻修的替代方案。本研究旨在评估这种骨干在治疗特定的Paprosky II-IV骨缺损中的效果:这项回顾性研究纳入了2012年1月至2020年12月期间使用锥形矩形无骨水泥短柄进行保守股骨翻修的73名患者(涉及76个髋关节)。术前股骨头缺损情况如下:II 型 54 例,IIIA 型 11 例,IIIB 型 7 例,IV 型 4 例。翻修指征包括无菌性松动(76.3%)和假体关节感染(23.7%)。所有患者均使用了三家公司生产的六种锥形矩形无骨水泥柄。其中,SLR-Plus、SL-Plus MIA 和 Corail 茎用于大多数患者(分别占 40.8%、23.7% 和 17.1%)。这些骨干的平均长度为 171.7 毫米(SD 27 毫米;122-215 毫米)。对放射学结果、哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS)、并发症和存活率进行了分析。随访时间平均为7年(3-11年不等):结果:有三个髋关节(3.9%)出现了下沉,所有的骨柄都实现了稳定的骨生长。67个髋关节(88.2%)发现残余溶骨区的股骨近端骨修复,9个髋关节(11.8%)发现持续缺损,0个病例发现缺损增加。在该系列中没有发现骨干骨折和骨干松动。平均HHS从术前的32(范围15-50)明显改善到最后一次随访时的82(范围68-94)(t = - 36.297,P 结论:使用锥形矩形短无骨水泥柄进行保守性股骨翻修,可提供良好的放射学结果、关节功能和中期存活率,且并发症极少。值得注意的是,硬化的股骨近端骨壳应具有持续、完整的结构和足够的支撑强度,这是使用此类骨干的指征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信