Prevention of preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-21 Print Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0119
Henrique G Provinciatto, Maria E Barbalho, Laura F Crosara, Pedro V B Orsini, Alexandre Provinciatto, Chris E Philip, Rodrigo Ruano, Edward Araujo Júnior
{"title":"Prevention of preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Henrique G Provinciatto, Maria E Barbalho, Laura F Crosara, Pedro V B Orsini, Alexandre Provinciatto, Chris E Philip, Rodrigo Ruano, Edward Araujo Júnior","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the preventive strategies for preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to December 2023 with no filters. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were manually examined to identify any supplementary studies. We selected randomized controlled trials and cohorts comparing interventions to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio version 4.3.1. Randomized controlled trials and cohorts were assessed respectively using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions tool and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included eight studies comprising a total of 719 patients. Compared with expectant management, cerclage stood out as the only intervention associated with an increase in the survival of at least one twin (risk ratio 1.12; 95 % confidence interval 1.01-1.23). Our subgroup analysis based on different thresholds for short cervix demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth before 32 weeks with ultrasound-indicated cerclage using a 15 mm criterion (risk ratio 0.65; 95 % confidence interval 0.47-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests the potential benefit of cerclage as a preventive strategy for preterm birth in pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. These findings highlight the necessity for further investigation to corroborate our results and address the optimal threshold for ultrasound-indicated cerclage.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"712-721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the preventive strategies for preterm birth in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.

Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to December 2023 with no filters. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were manually examined to identify any supplementary studies. We selected randomized controlled trials and cohorts comparing interventions to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using RStudio version 4.3.1. Randomized controlled trials and cohorts were assessed respectively using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions tool and Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.

Results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included eight studies comprising a total of 719 patients. Compared with expectant management, cerclage stood out as the only intervention associated with an increase in the survival of at least one twin (risk ratio 1.12; 95 % confidence interval 1.01-1.23). Our subgroup analysis based on different thresholds for short cervix demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth before 32 weeks with ultrasound-indicated cerclage using a 15 mm criterion (risk ratio 0.65; 95 % confidence interval 0.47-0.92).

Conclusions: Our study suggests the potential benefit of cerclage as a preventive strategy for preterm birth in pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. These findings highlight the necessity for further investigation to corroborate our results and address the optimal threshold for ultrasound-indicated cerclage.

预防双胞胎输血综合征早产:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
目的我们旨在进行一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析,以评估双胎输血综合征早产的预防策略:方法:我们对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Central 进行了检索,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 12 月,未作任何筛选。此外,我们还人工检查了纳入研究的参考文献目录,以确定任何补充研究。我们选择了随机对照试验和队列研究,这些试验和研究比较了预防并发双胎输血综合征的双胎妊娠早产的干预措施。我们使用 RStudio 4.3.1 版进行了随机效应频数网络荟萃分析。使用干预措施非随机研究偏倚风险工具和 Cochrane 协作组织的随机试验偏倚风险评估工具分别对随机对照试验和队列进行了评估:在这项系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们纳入了 8 项研究,共计 719 名患者。与预产期管理相比,宫颈环扎术是唯一能提高至少一对双胞胎存活率的干预措施(风险比为 1.12;95% 置信区间为 1.01-1.23)。我们根据宫颈过短的不同阈值进行的亚组分析表明,以 15 毫米为标准进行超声提示的宫颈环扎术可显著降低 32 周前早产的风险(风险比为 0.65;95% 置信区间为 0.47-0.92):我们的研究表明,在双胎输血综合征并发妊娠中,采用宫颈环扎术作为早产预防策略具有潜在的益处。这些发现强调了进一步调查的必要性,以证实我们的结果,并解决超声提示的宫颈环扎的最佳阈值问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信