Mastery Learning in Preclinical Endodontics Using Customized 3D-Printed Tooth Models for Deliberate Practice: An Application of Educational Design Research

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Mastery Learning in Preclinical Endodontics Using Customized 3D-Printed Tooth Models for Deliberate Practice: An Application of Educational Design Research","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study, conducted within an educational design research (EDR) framework, assessed the use of customized 3D-printed tooth models at various difficulty levels to enhance mastery learning and deliberate practice in preclinical endodontic training.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The EDR was conducted in a preclinical endodontic training involving 42 third-year students. The study focused on developing and evaluating 3D-printed tooth models customized into 3 difficulty levels to facilitate mastery learning for the access opening procedure on upper anterior teeth. To promote deliberate practice, we ensured ample availability of these models. The evaluation combined quantitative analysis, using Friedman and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests to assess practice volume and performance, with qualitative feedback from interviews and focus groups, analyzed via content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a significant reduction in practice time across the different model levels, with students using an average of 1.5–1.8 models per level. No significant differences in performance scores were observed across levels and natural tooth (<em>P</em><span> = .333). Feedback highlighted the models' educational value in enhancing dental training, indicating their effectiveness in improving learning experiences and skill development in endodontic education.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The innovative design of a 3D-printed tooth model system, which features 3 levels of difficulty and was developed within an EDR framework, allowed for tailored learning progressions and ample practice opportunities. This significantly enhanced the endodontic training experience and skill development by providing varied and realistic challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study, conducted within an educational design research (EDR) framework, assessed the use of customized 3D-printed tooth models at various difficulty levels to enhance mastery learning and deliberate practice in preclinical endodontic training.

Methods

The EDR was conducted in a preclinical endodontic training involving 42 third-year students. The study focused on developing and evaluating 3D-printed tooth models customized into 3 difficulty levels to facilitate mastery learning for the access opening procedure on upper anterior teeth. To promote deliberate practice, we ensured ample availability of these models. The evaluation combined quantitative analysis, using Friedman and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests to assess practice volume and performance, with qualitative feedback from interviews and focus groups, analyzed via content analysis.

Results

There was a significant reduction in practice time across the different model levels, with students using an average of 1.5–1.8 models per level. No significant differences in performance scores were observed across levels and natural tooth (P = .333). Feedback highlighted the models' educational value in enhancing dental training, indicating their effectiveness in improving learning experiences and skill development in endodontic education.

Conclusions

The innovative design of a 3D-printed tooth model system, which features 3 levels of difficulty and was developed within an EDR framework, allowed for tailored learning progressions and ample practice opportunities. This significantly enhanced the endodontic training experience and skill development by providing varied and realistic challenges.

利用定制的三维打印牙模进行刻意练习,在临床前牙体牙髓病学中掌握学习方法:教育设计研究的应用。
简介:本研究在教育设计研究(EDR)框架内进行,评估了在临床前牙体管治疗培训中使用不同难度的定制3D打印牙齿模型来加强掌握学习和刻意练习的情况:EDR 在临床前牙体牙髓病学培训中进行,共有 42 名三年级学生参加。研究的重点是开发和评估定制为三个难度级别的 3D 打印牙齿模型,以促进上前牙通路开放程序的掌握学习。为了促进刻意练习,我们确保了这些模型的充足供应。评估结合了定量分析(使用弗里德曼检验和Wilcoxon Signed-Rank检验评估练习量和成绩)、访谈和焦点小组的定性反馈(通过内容分析进行分析):不同级别的模型练习时间明显减少,学生平均每个级别使用 1.5 到 1.8 个模型。不同级别和天然牙的成绩分数没有明显差异(P = .333)。反馈意见强调了模型在加强牙科培训方面的教育价值,表明其在改善牙髓病学教育中的学习体验和技能发展方面的有效性:三维打印牙齿模型系统的创新设计具有三个难度级别,并在 EDR 框架内开发,可实现量身定制的学习进度和充足的练习机会。通过提供多样化和现实的挑战,这极大地增强了牙髓病学培训体验和技能发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信