Variation in completeness of coding external cause of injuries under ICD-10-CM.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Christine C Stewart, Gregory Simon, Brian K Ahmedani, Arne Beck, Yihe G Daida, Frances L Lynch, Ashli A Owen-Smith, Sonya L Negriff, Rebecca Rossom, Stacy A Sterling, Christine Y Lu, Michael Schoenbaum
{"title":"Variation in completeness of coding external cause of injuries under ICD-10-CM.","authors":"Christine C Stewart, Gregory Simon, Brian K Ahmedani, Arne Beck, Yihe G Daida, Frances L Lynch, Ashli A Owen-Smith, Sonya L Negriff, Rebecca Rossom, Stacy A Sterling, Christine Y Lu, Michael Schoenbaum","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Information about causes of injury is key for injury prevention efforts. Historically, cause-of-injury coding in clinical practice has been incomplete due to the need for extra diagnosis codes in the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) coding. The transition to ICD-10-CM and increased use of clinical support software for diagnosis coding is expected to improve completeness of cause-of-injury coding. This paper assesses the recording of external cause-of-injury codes specifically for those diagnoses where an additional code is still required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used electronic health record and claims data from 10 health systems from October 2015 to December 2021 to identify all inpatient and emergency encounters with a primary diagnosis of injury. The proportion of encounters that also included a valid external cause-of-injury code is presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most health systems had high rates of cause-of-injury coding: over 85% in emergency departments and over 75% in inpatient encounters with primary injury diagnoses. However, several sites had lower rates in both settings. State mandates were associated with consistently high external cause recording.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Completeness of cause-of-injury coding improved since the adoption of ICD-10-CM coding and increased slightly over the study period at most sites. However, significant variation remained, and completeness of cause-of-injury coding in any diagnosis data used for injury prevention planning should be empirically determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"412-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Information about causes of injury is key for injury prevention efforts. Historically, cause-of-injury coding in clinical practice has been incomplete due to the need for extra diagnosis codes in the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) coding. The transition to ICD-10-CM and increased use of clinical support software for diagnosis coding is expected to improve completeness of cause-of-injury coding. This paper assesses the recording of external cause-of-injury codes specifically for those diagnoses where an additional code is still required.

Methods: We used electronic health record and claims data from 10 health systems from October 2015 to December 2021 to identify all inpatient and emergency encounters with a primary diagnosis of injury. The proportion of encounters that also included a valid external cause-of-injury code is presented.

Results: Most health systems had high rates of cause-of-injury coding: over 85% in emergency departments and over 75% in inpatient encounters with primary injury diagnoses. However, several sites had lower rates in both settings. State mandates were associated with consistently high external cause recording.

Conclusions: Completeness of cause-of-injury coding improved since the adoption of ICD-10-CM coding and increased slightly over the study period at most sites. However, significant variation remained, and completeness of cause-of-injury coding in any diagnosis data used for injury prevention planning should be empirically determined.

ICD-10-CM 下外部伤害原因编码完整性的差异。
导言:有关伤害原因的信息是伤害预防工作的关键。由于在《国际疾病分类-第九版-临床修正》(ICD-9-CM)编码中需要额外的诊断代码,临床实践中的受伤原因编码历来不完整。随着向 ICD-10-CM 的过渡以及诊断编码临床支持软件使用的增加,伤因编码的完整性有望得到改善。本文评估了外部伤因编码的记录情况,特别是那些仍然需要额外编码的诊断:我们使用了 10 个医疗系统在 2015 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月期间的电子健康记录和理赔数据,以识别所有以受伤为主要诊断的住院和急诊就诊。结果:大多数医疗系统的受伤原因编码率都很高:结果:大多数医疗系统的受伤原因编码率很高:急诊科超过 85%,住院病人中主要诊断为受伤的比例超过 75%。然而,一些医疗机构在这两种情况下的编码率都较低。州政府的规定与外部原因记录率一直较高有关:结论:自采用 ICD-10-CM 编码以来,受伤原因编码的完整性有所改善,在研究期间,大多数医疗机构的编码完整性略有提高。但是,差异仍然很大,因此在任何用于伤害预防规划的诊断数据中,伤害原因编码的完整性都应根据经验来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信