An Estimation of the Monetary Value of the Person-Sievert Useful for Occupational Radiological Protection within the Healthcare System of Sweden.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andreas Engström, Mats Isaksson, Reza Javid, Per-Anders Larsson, Charlotta Lundh, Magnus Båth
{"title":"An Estimation of the Monetary Value of the Person-Sievert Useful for Occupational Radiological Protection within the Healthcare System of Sweden.","authors":"Andreas Engström, Mats Isaksson, Reza Javid, Per-Anders Larsson, Charlotta Lundh, Magnus Båth","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle includes taking into account economic and societal factors. To consider these factors, decision-aiding techniques such as cost-benefit analysis were introduced by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 50 y ago. Over the years, developments in health economics have led to new ways of deriving the concept of a value of a statistical life (VSL), which now is influencing the monetary value assigned to a unit of collective dose for radiological protection purposes (the α value) used in cost-benefit analyses. The aim of the present study was to estimate an α value useful for occupational radiological protection within the healthcare system of Sweden. A survey based on the stated preference approach was developed and sent to staff who are exposed to ionizing radiation at their work in Region Västra Götaland (Sweden). The survey essentially contained two scenarios: the respondents' willingness to pay for measures against radon exposure at home and their willingness to accept compensation for x-ray exposure at work. Answers from 718 respondents were collected. In the sensitivity analysis of the survey, the overall median VSL based on the two scenarios was calculated to be $50 million (IQR $10 to 363 million). The corresponding α value was established to $1,600 person-mSv -1 ($2,100 person-mSv -1 if excess burden of taxes is excluded). The recommended α value is in the high end compared to other studies but within the interval of values being used by nuclear utilities today. The α value should be seen in the light of ICRP's recommendation about stakeholder involvement as an important part of the optimization process.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle includes taking into account economic and societal factors. To consider these factors, decision-aiding techniques such as cost-benefit analysis were introduced by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 50 y ago. Over the years, developments in health economics have led to new ways of deriving the concept of a value of a statistical life (VSL), which now is influencing the monetary value assigned to a unit of collective dose for radiological protection purposes (the α value) used in cost-benefit analyses. The aim of the present study was to estimate an α value useful for occupational radiological protection within the healthcare system of Sweden. A survey based on the stated preference approach was developed and sent to staff who are exposed to ionizing radiation at their work in Region Västra Götaland (Sweden). The survey essentially contained two scenarios: the respondents' willingness to pay for measures against radon exposure at home and their willingness to accept compensation for x-ray exposure at work. Answers from 718 respondents were collected. In the sensitivity analysis of the survey, the overall median VSL based on the two scenarios was calculated to be $50 million (IQR $10 to 363 million). The corresponding α value was established to $1,600 person-mSv -1 ($2,100 person-mSv -1 if excess burden of taxes is excluded). The recommended α value is in the high end compared to other studies but within the interval of values being used by nuclear utilities today. The α value should be seen in the light of ICRP's recommendation about stakeholder involvement as an important part of the optimization process.

对瑞典医疗保健系统内用于职业辐射防护的人-西弗特货币价值的估算。
摘要:"尽可能合理地低"(ALARA)原则包括考虑经济和社会因素。为了考虑这些因素,国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)在 50 年前引入了成本效益分析等辅助决策技术。多年来,健康经济学的发展带来了推导统计寿命值(VSL)概念的新方法,而统计寿命值现在正影响着成本效益分析中用于辐射防护的单位集体剂量的货币价值(α 值)。本研究的目的是估算出瑞典医疗系统中用于职业辐射防护的 α 值。研究人员根据陈述偏好法编制了一份调查表,并将其发送给瑞典 Västra Götaland 地区在工作中暴露于电离辐射的工作人员。调查主要包括两种情况:受访者是否愿意为家中的氡照射措施付费,以及是否愿意接受工作中的 X 射线照射补偿。共收集到 718 位受访者的回答。在对调查进行的敏感性分析中,根据这两种情况计算出的总体自愿赔偿额中值为 5,000 万美元(IQR 为 1,000 万至 3.63 亿美元)。相应的 α 值被确定为 1,600 美元/人-mSv-1(如果不考虑超额税收负担,则为 2,100 美元/人-mSv-1)。与其他研究相比,建议的 α 值偏高,但在目前核设施使用的数值范围内。在看待 α 值时,应考虑到国际辐射防护委员会的建议,即利益相关者的参与是优化过程的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信