Computational discovery of dual potential inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike/ACE2 and Mpro: 3D-pharmacophore, docking-based virtual screening, quantum mechanics and molecular dynamics
Boris D. Bekono, Pascal Amoa Onguéné, Conrad V. Simoben, Luc C. O. Owono, Fidele Ntie-Kang
{"title":"Computational discovery of dual potential inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike/ACE2 and Mpro: 3D-pharmacophore, docking-based virtual screening, quantum mechanics and molecular dynamics","authors":"Boris D. Bekono, Pascal Amoa Onguéné, Conrad V. Simoben, Luc C. O. Owono, Fidele Ntie-Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00249-024-01713-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To find drugs against COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2, promising targets include the fusion of the viral spike with the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as well as the main protease (M<sup>pro</sup>). These proteins are responsible for viral entry and replication, respectively. We combined several state-of-the-art computational methods, including, protein–ligand interaction fingerprint, 3D-pharmacophores, molecular-docking, MM-GBSA, DFT, and MD simulations to explore two databases: ChEMBL and NANPDB to identify molecules that could both block spike/ACE2 fusion and inhibit M<sup>pro</sup>. A total of 1,690,649 compounds from the two databases were screened using the pharmacophore model obtained from PLIF analysis. Five recent complexes of M<sup>pro</sup> co-crystallized with different ligands were used to generate the pharmacophore model, allowing 4,829 compounds that passed this prefilter. These were then submitted to molecular docking against M<sup>pro</sup>. The 5% top-ranked docking hits from docking result having scores <span>\\(<\\)</span> −8.32 kcal mol<sup>−1</sup> were selected and then docked against spike/ACE2. Only four compounds: ChEMBL244958, ChEMBL266531, ChEMBL3680003, and 1-methoxy-3-indolymethyl glucosinolate (<b>4</b>) displayed binding energies <span>\\(<-\\)</span> 8.21 kcal mol<sup>−1</sup> (for the native ligand) were considered as putative dual-target inhibitors. Furthermore, predictive ADMET, MM-GBSA and DFT/6-311G(d,p) were performed on these compounds and compared with those of well-known antivirals. DFT calculations showed that ChEMBL244958 and compound <b>4</b> had significant predicted reactivity values. Molecular dynamics simulations of the docked complexes were run for 100 ns and used to validate the stability docked poses and to confirm that these hits are putative dual binders of the spike/ACE2 and the M<sup>pro</sup>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":548,"journal":{"name":"European Biophysics Journal","volume":"53 5-6","pages":"277 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Biophysics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00249-024-01713-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To find drugs against COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2, promising targets include the fusion of the viral spike with the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as well as the main protease (Mpro). These proteins are responsible for viral entry and replication, respectively. We combined several state-of-the-art computational methods, including, protein–ligand interaction fingerprint, 3D-pharmacophores, molecular-docking, MM-GBSA, DFT, and MD simulations to explore two databases: ChEMBL and NANPDB to identify molecules that could both block spike/ACE2 fusion and inhibit Mpro. A total of 1,690,649 compounds from the two databases were screened using the pharmacophore model obtained from PLIF analysis. Five recent complexes of Mpro co-crystallized with different ligands were used to generate the pharmacophore model, allowing 4,829 compounds that passed this prefilter. These were then submitted to molecular docking against Mpro. The 5% top-ranked docking hits from docking result having scores \(<\) −8.32 kcal mol−1 were selected and then docked against spike/ACE2. Only four compounds: ChEMBL244958, ChEMBL266531, ChEMBL3680003, and 1-methoxy-3-indolymethyl glucosinolate (4) displayed binding energies \(<-\) 8.21 kcal mol−1 (for the native ligand) were considered as putative dual-target inhibitors. Furthermore, predictive ADMET, MM-GBSA and DFT/6-311G(d,p) were performed on these compounds and compared with those of well-known antivirals. DFT calculations showed that ChEMBL244958 and compound 4 had significant predicted reactivity values. Molecular dynamics simulations of the docked complexes were run for 100 ns and used to validate the stability docked poses and to confirm that these hits are putative dual binders of the spike/ACE2 and the Mpro.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes papers in the field of biophysics, which is defined as the study of biological phenomena by using physical methods and concepts. Original papers, reviews and Biophysics letters are published. The primary goal of this journal is to advance the understanding of biological structure and function by application of the principles of physical science, and by presenting the work in a biophysical context.
Papers employing a distinctively biophysical approach at all levels of biological organisation will be considered, as will both experimental and theoretical studies. The criteria for acceptance are scientific content, originality and relevance to biological systems of current interest and importance.
Principal areas of interest include:
- Structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules
- Membrane biophysics and ion channels
- Cell biophysics and organisation
- Macromolecular assemblies
- Biophysical methods and instrumentation
- Advanced microscopics
- System dynamics.