Cognitive impact of anticholinergic and sedative burden in people with HIV.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
AIDS Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000003966
Henry Ukachukwu Michael, Marie-Josée Brouillette, Robyn Tamblyn, Lesley K Fellows, Nancy E Mayo
{"title":"Cognitive impact of anticholinergic and sedative burden in people with HIV.","authors":"Henry Ukachukwu Michael, Marie-Josée Brouillette, Robyn Tamblyn, Lesley K Fellows, Nancy E Mayo","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000003966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to estimate the extent to which anticholinergic and sedative burden is associated with cognitive ability and self-reported cognitive difficulties (SCD) in middle-aged and older adults living with HIV.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis examined data from the inaugural visit of participants enrolled in the Positive Brain Health Now (BHN) study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cognitive ability was measured using the Brief Cognitive Ability Measure (B-CAM; higher is better) and SCD using the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ; higher is worse). Medication burden was quantified using several scoring systems, including the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB), Anticholinergic and Sedative Burden Catalog (ACSBC), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and the Sedative Load Model (SLM). Multivariable Ordinary Least Squares and quantile regression were utilized to estimate average effects and distribution-specific impacts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 824 participants (mean age 53 years, 84.7% men), 41.4% used anticholinergics (ACSBC) and 39% used sedatives (SLM). High anticholinergic burden was linked to worse cognitive ability [ β = -3.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.16, -0.46] and SCD ( β = 3.89; 95% CI: 1.08, 6.71). Using three or more anticholinergics worsened cognitive ability ( β = -4.45; 95% CI: -8.54, -0.35), and using three or more sedatives increased SCD ( β  = 4.35; 95% CI: 0.92-7.78). Stronger negative associations were observed in participants with lower cognitive ability and more difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that anticholinergic and sedative burden may contribute to cognitive impairment in people with HIV. Personalized medication management and regular cognitive assessments could mitigate these adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"1819-1828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to estimate the extent to which anticholinergic and sedative burden is associated with cognitive ability and self-reported cognitive difficulties (SCD) in middle-aged and older adults living with HIV.

Design: This cross-sectional analysis examined data from the inaugural visit of participants enrolled in the Positive Brain Health Now (BHN) study.

Methods: Cognitive ability was measured using the Brief Cognitive Ability Measure (B-CAM; higher is better) and SCD using the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ; higher is worse). Medication burden was quantified using several scoring systems, including the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB), Anticholinergic and Sedative Burden Catalog (ACSBC), Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS), Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), and the Sedative Load Model (SLM). Multivariable Ordinary Least Squares and quantile regression were utilized to estimate average effects and distribution-specific impacts, respectively.

Results: Of 824 participants (mean age 53 years, 84.7% men), 41.4% used anticholinergics (ACSBC) and 39% used sedatives (SLM). High anticholinergic burden was linked to worse cognitive ability [ β = -3.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): -7.16, -0.46] and SCD ( β = 3.89; 95% CI: 1.08, 6.71). Using three or more anticholinergics worsened cognitive ability ( β = -4.45; 95% CI: -8.54, -0.35), and using three or more sedatives increased SCD ( β  = 4.35; 95% CI: 0.92-7.78). Stronger negative associations were observed in participants with lower cognitive ability and more difficulties.

Conclusions: These results suggest that anticholinergic and sedative burden may contribute to cognitive impairment in people with HIV. Personalized medication management and regular cognitive assessments could mitigate these adverse effects.

抗胆碱能药物和镇静剂对艾滋病病毒感染者认知能力的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在估算抗胆碱能药物和镇静剂负担与中老年艾滋病病毒感染者的认知能力和自述认知障碍(SCD)的相关程度:本横断面分析研究了积极脑健康(BHN)研究参与者的首次访问数据:认知能力采用简明认知能力测量法(B-CAM;越高越好)进行测量,SCD采用感知缺陷问卷(PDQ;越高越差)进行测量。药物负担采用多种评分系统进行量化,包括抗胆碱能认知负担(ACB)、抗胆碱能和镇静负担目录(ACSBC)、抗胆碱能药物量表(ADS)、抗胆碱能风险量表(ARS)和镇静负荷模型(SLM)。采用多变量普通最小二乘法和量子回归法分别估算平均效应和特定分布的影响:在 824 名参与者(平均年龄 53 岁,84.7% 为男性)中,41.4% 使用抗胆碱能药物(ACSBC),39% 使用镇静剂(SLM)。高抗胆碱能药物负担与认知能力下降(β = -3.81;95% CI:-7.16,-0.46)和 SCD(β = 3.89;95% CI:1.08,6.71)有关。使用三种或三种以上抗胆碱能药物会使认知能力恶化(β = -4.45;95% CI:-8.54,-0.35),使用三种或三种以上镇静剂会增加 SCD(β = 4.35;95% CI:0.92 -7.78)。在认知能力较低和遇到困难较多的参与者中观察到更强的负相关:这些结果表明,抗胆碱能药物和镇静剂负担可能会导致艾滋病患者的认知障碍。个性化药物管理和定期认知评估可减轻这些不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS
AIDS 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
478
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信