The Enormous Potential of Sodium/Potassium-Ion Batteries as the Mainstream Energy Storage Technology for Large-Scale Commercial Applications

IF 27.4 1区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yanjun Gao, Qiyao Yu, Huize Yang, Jianguo Zhang, Wei Wang
{"title":"The Enormous Potential of Sodium/Potassium-Ion Batteries as the Mainstream Energy Storage Technology for Large-Scale Commercial Applications","authors":"Yanjun Gao,&nbsp;Qiyao Yu,&nbsp;Huize Yang,&nbsp;Jianguo Zhang,&nbsp;Wei Wang","doi":"10.1002/adma.202405989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cost-effectiveness plays a decisive role in sustainable operating of rechargeable batteries. As such, the low cost-consumption of sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) provides a promising direction for “how do SIBs/PIBs replace Li-ion batteries (LIBs) counterparts” based on their resource abundance and advanced electrochemical performance. To rationalize the SIBs/PIBs technologies as alternatives to LIBs from the unit energy cost perspective, this review gives the specific criteria for their energy density at possible electrode-price grades and various battery-longevity levels. The cost ($ kWh<sup>−1</sup> cycle<sup>−1</sup>) advantage of SIBs/PIBs is ascertained by the cheap raw-material compensation for the cycle performance deficiency and the energy density gap with LIBs. Furthermore, the cost comparison between SIBs and PIBs, especially on cost per kWh and per cycle, is also involved. This review explicitly manifests the practicability and cost-effectiveness toward SIBs are superior to PIBs whose commercialization has so far been hindered by low energy density. Even so, the huge potential on sustainability of PIBs, to outperform SIBs, as the mainstream energy storage technology is revealed as long as PIBs achieve long cycle life or enhanced energy density, the related outlook of which is proceeded as the next development directions for commercial applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":114,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":27.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.202405989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness plays a decisive role in sustainable operating of rechargeable batteries. As such, the low cost-consumption of sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) provides a promising direction for “how do SIBs/PIBs replace Li-ion batteries (LIBs) counterparts” based on their resource abundance and advanced electrochemical performance. To rationalize the SIBs/PIBs technologies as alternatives to LIBs from the unit energy cost perspective, this review gives the specific criteria for their energy density at possible electrode-price grades and various battery-longevity levels. The cost ($ kWh−1 cycle−1) advantage of SIBs/PIBs is ascertained by the cheap raw-material compensation for the cycle performance deficiency and the energy density gap with LIBs. Furthermore, the cost comparison between SIBs and PIBs, especially on cost per kWh and per cycle, is also involved. This review explicitly manifests the practicability and cost-effectiveness toward SIBs are superior to PIBs whose commercialization has so far been hindered by low energy density. Even so, the huge potential on sustainability of PIBs, to outperform SIBs, as the mainstream energy storage technology is revealed as long as PIBs achieve long cycle life or enhanced energy density, the related outlook of which is proceeded as the next development directions for commercial applications.

钠/钾离子电池作为大规模商业应用的主流储能技术的巨大潜力
成本效益对可充电电池的可持续运行起着决定性作用。因此,钠离子电池(SIBs)和钾离子电池(PIBs)的低成本消耗为 "SIBs/PIBs 如何替代锂离子电池(LIBs)"提供了一个基于其资源丰富性和先进电化学性能的前景广阔的方向。为了从单位能量成本的角度合理解释作为锂离子电池替代品的 SIB/PIBs 技术,本综述给出了其在可能的电价等级和不同的电池寿命水平下的能量密度的具体标准。SIBs/PIBs 的成本优势(千瓦时-1 循环-1 美元)是通过廉价的原材料补偿循环性能的不足以及与锂离子电池的能量密度差距来确定的。此外,还对 SIB 和 PIB 的成本进行了比较,特别是每千瓦时和每个循环的成本。本综述明确表明,SIB 在实用性和成本效益方面优于 PIB,而 PIB 的商业化迄今一直受到低能量密度的阻碍。尽管如此,只要 PIBs 实现了长循环寿命或更高的能量密度,其作为主流储能技术的可持续发展的巨大潜力就会显现出来,PIBs 将超越 SIBs,成为商业应用的下一个发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Materials
Advanced Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
4.10%
发文量
2182
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Advanced Materials, one of the world's most prestigious journals and the foundation of the Advanced portfolio, is the home of choice for best-in-class materials science for more than 30 years. Following this fast-growing and interdisciplinary field, we are considering and publishing the most important discoveries on any and all materials from materials scientists, chemists, physicists, engineers as well as health and life scientists and bringing you the latest results and trends in modern materials-related research every week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信