Perception of medical students on the use of Case-Based Collaborative Learning (CBCL) in the human physiology course

Q2 Social Sciences
Rafael de Oliveira Carvalho , Camila Moraes Marques , Juliana Ollé Mendes , Henrique Sarubbi Fillmann , Rosiane Guetter Mello
{"title":"Perception of medical students on the use of Case-Based Collaborative Learning (CBCL) in the human physiology course","authors":"Rafael de Oliveira Carvalho ,&nbsp;Camila Moraes Marques ,&nbsp;Juliana Ollé Mendes ,&nbsp;Henrique Sarubbi Fillmann ,&nbsp;Rosiane Guetter Mello","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Medical schools focus on a traditional curriculum in which the student is not the center of the process. This has led to the emergence of active methodologies such as Case-Based Collaborative Learning (CBCL).</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of this study was to clarify medical students' perceptions of the use of the CBCL active methodology in the Human Physiology course.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>This was a qualitative study carried out with 20 medical students studying physiology at a medical school. The students carried out a preliminary study with the material provided by the teacher. In the classroom, they formed small groups and the teacher opened a clinical case on the topic of the lesson and the CBCL session began to discuss it. The whole process was mediated by the teacher. The content analysis proposed by Bardin was used to analyze the information.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As a result, it was possible to understand that medical students perceive that active methodologies favor the integration of knowledge, that they are student-centered and that they are a positive experience. Compared to other methodologies, students report better performance and participation, and highlight the difficulty of concentrating when using traditional methodologies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>They also point out that the methodology allows for constructive debate, contributing to the development of teamwork and therefore to greater student learning, which are the advantages related to the CBCL's active methodology according to the students. As disadvantages, they highlighted the fear of overload and the lack of commitment of some students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000615/pdfft?md5=a1f298f50ad46e86103cdb7325906a26&pid=1-s2.0-S1575181324000615-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Medical schools focus on a traditional curriculum in which the student is not the center of the process. This has led to the emergence of active methodologies such as Case-Based Collaborative Learning (CBCL).

Aim

The aim of this study was to clarify medical students' perceptions of the use of the CBCL active methodology in the Human Physiology course.

Material and methods

This was a qualitative study carried out with 20 medical students studying physiology at a medical school. The students carried out a preliminary study with the material provided by the teacher. In the classroom, they formed small groups and the teacher opened a clinical case on the topic of the lesson and the CBCL session began to discuss it. The whole process was mediated by the teacher. The content analysis proposed by Bardin was used to analyze the information.

Results

As a result, it was possible to understand that medical students perceive that active methodologies favor the integration of knowledge, that they are student-centered and that they are a positive experience. Compared to other methodologies, students report better performance and participation, and highlight the difficulty of concentrating when using traditional methodologies.

Conclusion

They also point out that the methodology allows for constructive debate, contributing to the development of teamwork and therefore to greater student learning, which are the advantages related to the CBCL's active methodology according to the students. As disadvantages, they highlighted the fear of overload and the lack of commitment of some students.

医学生对在人体生理学课程中使用病例协作学习(CBCL)的看法
导言医学院注重传统课程,学生不是课程的中心。本研究旨在阐明医学生对在人体生理学课程中使用 CBCL 主动教学法的看法。学生们利用教师提供的材料进行了初步学习。在课堂上,他们组成小组,教师就本节课的主题打开一个临床病例,CBCL 课程开始讨论该病例。整个过程由教师主持。结果可以看出,医学生认为主动式教学法有利于知识的整合,以学生为中心,是一种积极的体验。结论他们还指出,该方法允许进行建设性辩论,有助于培养团队合作精神,从而促进学生的学习。作为缺点,他们强调了对负担过重的恐惧和一些学生缺乏承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信