Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) through elastomeric continuous infusion pumps in a real-life observational study: Characteristics, safety, and efficacy analysis.

Gabriele Giuliano, Domenico Tarantino, Enrica Tamburrini, Mario Cesare Nurchis, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Francesca Raffaelli
{"title":"Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) through elastomeric continuous infusion pumps in a real-life observational study: Characteristics, safety, and efficacy analysis.","authors":"Gabriele Giuliano, Domenico Tarantino, Enrica Tamburrini, Mario Cesare Nurchis, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Francesca Raffaelli","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to present real-life data on the use, efficacy, and safety of administering antibiotic therapy through portable elastomeric pumps (pEP) in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2023 in a large academic hospital in Rome, Italy. All patients receiving antibiotic therapy via pEP were included up to a follow-up period of 90 days after the end of antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was the treatment response. Secondary endpoints were adverse events attributable to the drug administered, the vascular catheter, or the infection itself.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 490 patients referred to our outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) unit, 94 (19.2%) received antibiotic therapy via pEP and were included in the final analysis. The most frequently treated infections were those involving bone and prosthetics, including spondylodiscitis (n=27; 28.8%). Most infections were due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=55; 48.3%). Cefepime (n=32; 34.0%), piperacillin/tazobactam (n=29; 30.9%), ceftolozane/tazobactam (n=7; 7.5%), and oxacillin (n=7; 7.5%) were the most frequently administered antibiotics. The infection cure rate reached 88.3% (n=83). 12 patients (12.8%) reported adverse events, of which half (6.4%) were drug-related and half (6.4%) were line-related.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OPAT through portable elastomeric infusion pumps proved to be safe and effective. It also contributed to the reduction of healthcare costs, fully respecting the principles of personalized medicine. This strategy has emerged as a promising tool for antibiotic stewardship and infection control.</p>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2024.04.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to present real-life data on the use, efficacy, and safety of administering antibiotic therapy through portable elastomeric pumps (pEP) in the outpatient setting.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2023 in a large academic hospital in Rome, Italy. All patients receiving antibiotic therapy via pEP were included up to a follow-up period of 90 days after the end of antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was the treatment response. Secondary endpoints were adverse events attributable to the drug administered, the vascular catheter, or the infection itself.

Results: Of the 490 patients referred to our outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) unit, 94 (19.2%) received antibiotic therapy via pEP and were included in the final analysis. The most frequently treated infections were those involving bone and prosthetics, including spondylodiscitis (n=27; 28.8%). Most infections were due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=55; 48.3%). Cefepime (n=32; 34.0%), piperacillin/tazobactam (n=29; 30.9%), ceftolozane/tazobactam (n=7; 7.5%), and oxacillin (n=7; 7.5%) were the most frequently administered antibiotics. The infection cure rate reached 88.3% (n=83). 12 patients (12.8%) reported adverse events, of which half (6.4%) were drug-related and half (6.4%) were line-related.

Conclusions: OPAT through portable elastomeric infusion pumps proved to be safe and effective. It also contributed to the reduction of healthcare costs, fully respecting the principles of personalized medicine. This strategy has emerged as a promising tool for antibiotic stewardship and infection control.

通过弹性连续输液泵进行门诊肠外抗生素治疗(OPAT)的实际观察研究:特点、安全性和疗效分析。
简介:本研究旨在介绍在门诊环境中使用便携式弹性泵(pEP)进行抗生素治疗的实际数据:本研究旨在提供有关在门诊环境中通过便携式弹性泵(pEP)进行抗生素治疗的使用、疗效和安全性的真实数据:这项回顾性观察队列研究于 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月在意大利罗马的一家大型学术医院进行。研究纳入了所有通过 pEP 接受抗生素治疗的患者,随访期为抗生素治疗结束后 90 天。主要结果是治疗反应。次要终点是因用药、血管导管或感染本身引起的不良事件:在转诊到我们门诊肠外抗生素治疗(OPAT)病房的 490 名患者中,有 94 人(19.2%)通过 pEP 接受了抗生素治疗,并纳入了最终分析。最常治疗的感染是涉及骨骼和假体的感染,包括脊柱盘炎(27 人;28.8%)。大多数感染由铜绿假单胞菌引起(样本数=55;48.3%)。头孢吡肟(32 人;34.0%)、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(29 人;30.9%)、头孢妥赞/他唑巴坦(7 人;7.5%)和奥沙西林(7 人;7.5%)是最常用的抗生素。感染治愈率达到 88.3%(83 人)。12名患者(12.8%)报告了不良事件,其中一半(6.4%)与药物有关,一半(6.4%)与管路有关:事实证明,通过便携式弹性输液泵进行 OPAT 是安全有效的。结论:事实证明,通过便携式弹性输液泵进行 OPAT 既安全又有效,还有助于降低医疗成本,充分体现了个性化医疗的原则。这一策略已成为抗生素管理和感染控制的一种有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信