Deep learning reconstruction for lumbar spine MRI acceleration: a prospective study.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hui Tang, Ming Hong, Lu Yu, Yang Song, Mengqiu Cao, Lei Xiang, Yan Zhou, Shiteng Suo
{"title":"Deep learning reconstruction for lumbar spine MRI acceleration: a prospective study.","authors":"Hui Tang, Ming Hong, Lu Yu, Yang Song, Mengqiu Cao, Lei Xiang, Yan Zhou, Shiteng Suo","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00470-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) turbo spin-echo images reconstructed using a deep learning technique (TSE-DL) with standard turbo spin-echo (TSE-SD) images of the lumbar spine regarding image quality and detection performance of common degenerative pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center study included 31 patients (15 males and 16 females; aged 51 ± 16 years (mean ± standard deviation)) who underwent lumbar spine exams with both TSE-SD and TSE-DL acquisitions for degenerative spine diseases. Images were analyzed by two radiologists and assessed for qualitative image quality using a 4-point Likert scale, quantitative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of anatomic landmarks, and detection of common pathologies. Paired-sample t, Wilcoxon, and McNemar tests, unweighted/linearly weighted Cohen κ statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scan time for TSE-DL and TSE-SD protocols was 2:55 and 5:17 min:s, respectively. The overall image quality was either significantly higher for TSE-DL or not significantly different between TSE-SD and TSE-DL. TSE-DL demonstrated higher SNR and subject noise scores than TSE-SD. For pathology detection, the interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect for TSE-DL, with κ values ranging from 0.61 to 1.00; the interprotocol agreement was almost perfect for both readers, with κ values ranging from 0.84 to 1.00. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic confidence or detection rate of common pathologies between the two sequences (p ≥ 0.081).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TSE-DL allowed for a 45% reduction in scan time over TSE-SD in lumbar spine MRI without compromising the overall image quality and showed comparable detection performance of common pathologies in the evaluation of degenerative lumbar spine changes.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Deep learning-reconstructed lumbar spine MRI protocol enabled a 45% reduction in scan time compared with conventional reconstruction, with comparable image quality and detection performance of common degenerative pathologies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• Lumbar spine MRI with deep learning reconstruction has broad application prospects. • Deep learning reconstruction of lumbar spine MRI saved 45% scan time without compromising overall image quality. • When compared with standard sequences, deep learning reconstruction showed similar detection performance of common degenerative lumbar spine pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00470-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) turbo spin-echo images reconstructed using a deep learning technique (TSE-DL) with standard turbo spin-echo (TSE-SD) images of the lumbar spine regarding image quality and detection performance of common degenerative pathologies.

Methods: This prospective, single-center study included 31 patients (15 males and 16 females; aged 51 ± 16 years (mean ± standard deviation)) who underwent lumbar spine exams with both TSE-SD and TSE-DL acquisitions for degenerative spine diseases. Images were analyzed by two radiologists and assessed for qualitative image quality using a 4-point Likert scale, quantitative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of anatomic landmarks, and detection of common pathologies. Paired-sample t, Wilcoxon, and McNemar tests, unweighted/linearly weighted Cohen κ statistics, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used.

Results: Scan time for TSE-DL and TSE-SD protocols was 2:55 and 5:17 min:s, respectively. The overall image quality was either significantly higher for TSE-DL or not significantly different between TSE-SD and TSE-DL. TSE-DL demonstrated higher SNR and subject noise scores than TSE-SD. For pathology detection, the interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect for TSE-DL, with κ values ranging from 0.61 to 1.00; the interprotocol agreement was almost perfect for both readers, with κ values ranging from 0.84 to 1.00. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic confidence or detection rate of common pathologies between the two sequences (p ≥ 0.081).

Conclusions: TSE-DL allowed for a 45% reduction in scan time over TSE-SD in lumbar spine MRI without compromising the overall image quality and showed comparable detection performance of common pathologies in the evaluation of degenerative lumbar spine changes.

Relevance statement: Deep learning-reconstructed lumbar spine MRI protocol enabled a 45% reduction in scan time compared with conventional reconstruction, with comparable image quality and detection performance of common degenerative pathologies.

Key points: • Lumbar spine MRI with deep learning reconstruction has broad application prospects. • Deep learning reconstruction of lumbar spine MRI saved 45% scan time without compromising overall image quality. • When compared with standard sequences, deep learning reconstruction showed similar detection performance of common degenerative lumbar spine pathologies.

Abstract Image

用于腰椎磁共振成像加速的深度学习重建:一项前瞻性研究。
背景:我们比较了使用深度学习技术重建的腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)涡轮自旋回波图像(TSE-DL)与标准涡轮自旋回波图像(TSE-SD)在图像质量和常见退行性病变检测性能方面的差异:这项前瞻性单中心研究共纳入了 31 名患者(男性 15 人,女性 16 人;年龄 51 ± 16 岁(平均 ± 标准差)),他们都接受了腰椎检查,并同时进行了 TSE-SD 和 TSE-DL 采集,以检测脊柱退行性疾病。图像由两名放射科医生进行分析,并使用 4 点李克特量表对图像质量、解剖标志物的定量信噪比 (SNR) 以及常见病变的检测进行评估。采用了配对样本 t 检验、Wilcoxon 检验和 McNemar 检验、非加权/线性加权 Cohen κ 统计法和类内相关系数:TSE-DL和TSE-SD方案的扫描时间分别为2:55分钟和5:17分钟。TSE-DL的整体图像质量明显更高,或者TSE-SD和TSE-DL之间没有明显差异。与 TSE-SD 相比,TSE-DL 的信噪比和主体噪声得分更高。在病理检测方面,TSE-DL 的读数间一致性很高,几乎达到完美,κ值在 0.61 到 1.00 之间;两个读数的协议间一致性几乎达到完美,κ值在 0.84 到 1.00 之间。两种序列的诊断可信度和常见病理的检出率没有明显差异(P≥0.081):TSE-DL使腰椎核磁共振成像的扫描时间比TSE-SD减少了45%,同时不影响整体图像质量,在评估腰椎退行性病变时对常见病变的检测性能相当:深度学习重建的腰椎核磁共振成像方案与传统重建相比,扫描时间缩短了45%,图像质量和常见退行性病变的检测性能相当:- 采用深度学习重建的腰椎磁共振成像具有广阔的应用前景。- 腰椎核磁共振成像的深度学习重建可节省45%的扫描时间,且不影响整体图像质量。- 与标准序列相比,深度学习重建对常见的腰椎退行性病变具有相似的检测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信