[Oral sedation in pediatric outpatient dentistry].

Q4 Medicine
E A Shavlokhova, I F Ostreikov, B D Babaev, M V Korolenkova, A S Dobrodeev, O R Mamedli
{"title":"[Oral sedation in pediatric outpatient dentistry].","authors":"E A Shavlokhova, I F Ostreikov, B D Babaev, M V Korolenkova, A S Dobrodeev, O R Mamedli","doi":"10.17116/stomat202410303142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>The aim of the study: </strong>Was to improve the quality of treatment in pediatric outpatient dentistry with the effective use of oral sedation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprised 60 children aged 3-12 years who were undergoing therapeutic/surgical dental treatment. All children's somatic state was assessed as ASAI-II. All children met a number of psychological, anamnestic and procedural criteria. Midazolam and chloropyramine in a dose calculated for the patient's body weight were used as components of oral sedation. The estimated sedation depth was Ramsay II-III. The study included an analysis of objective (the time of comfortable treatment, the amount of treated or removed teeth per visit, the possibility of treatment without anesthesia during further visits) and subjective (the possibility of contact with the child during treatment, behavioral reactions at home and on further visits) criteria. Negative behavioral reactions and dental effects were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The treatment features correlated with the age category and gender of the patient. In the older age group of 7-12 years, the amount of comfortable treatment time was higher, the possibility of contact with the child reached 100% (which is twice as much as in the younger one), and also a larger number of patients were treated during further visits without an anesthetic aid. At the same time, in the younger age group of 3-6 years, the volume of treatment per visit was higher, since it takes less time to treat a primary tooth than for a permanent one. Side effects (visual hallucinations, diplopia, hyperactivity, tearfulness and aggressiveness) were more often recorded in the younger age group, but emotional instability was equally manifested in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order to maximize the effectiveness of using oral sedation as a method, it is necessary to take into account the duration and traumatism of the proposed procedure, the peculiarities of age psychology and the peculiarities of the psychological development of boys and girls.</p>","PeriodicalId":35887,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410303142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study: Was to improve the quality of treatment in pediatric outpatient dentistry with the effective use of oral sedation.

Materials and methods: The study comprised 60 children aged 3-12 years who were undergoing therapeutic/surgical dental treatment. All children's somatic state was assessed as ASAI-II. All children met a number of psychological, anamnestic and procedural criteria. Midazolam and chloropyramine in a dose calculated for the patient's body weight were used as components of oral sedation. The estimated sedation depth was Ramsay II-III. The study included an analysis of objective (the time of comfortable treatment, the amount of treated or removed teeth per visit, the possibility of treatment without anesthesia during further visits) and subjective (the possibility of contact with the child during treatment, behavioral reactions at home and on further visits) criteria. Negative behavioral reactions and dental effects were also assessed.

Results: The treatment features correlated with the age category and gender of the patient. In the older age group of 7-12 years, the amount of comfortable treatment time was higher, the possibility of contact with the child reached 100% (which is twice as much as in the younger one), and also a larger number of patients were treated during further visits without an anesthetic aid. At the same time, in the younger age group of 3-6 years, the volume of treatment per visit was higher, since it takes less time to treat a primary tooth than for a permanent one. Side effects (visual hallucinations, diplopia, hyperactivity, tearfulness and aggressiveness) were more often recorded in the younger age group, but emotional instability was equally manifested in both groups.

Conclusion: In order to maximize the effectiveness of using oral sedation as a method, it is necessary to take into account the duration and traumatism of the proposed procedure, the peculiarities of age psychology and the peculiarities of the psychological development of boys and girls.

[儿童牙科门诊中的口服镇静剂]。
研究目的通过有效使用口服镇静剂,提高儿童牙科门诊的治疗质量:研究对象包括 60 名接受牙科治疗/手术的 3-12 岁儿童。所有儿童的躯体状态均被评估为 ASAI-II。所有儿童均符合一系列心理、精神和程序标准。口服镇静剂中使用了根据患者体重计算剂量的咪达唑仑和氯羟吡啶。估计镇静深度为拉姆塞 II-III。研究包括对客观标准(舒适治疗的时间、每次就诊治疗或拔除牙齿的数量、以后就诊时无需麻醉治疗的可能性)和主观标准(治疗期间与患儿接触的可能性、在家和以后就诊时的行为反应)的分析。此外,还对负面行为反应和牙齿影响进行了评估:治疗特点与患者的年龄和性别相关。在 7-12 岁的较大年龄组中,舒适的治疗时间较长,与孩子接触的可能性达到 100%(是较小年龄组的两倍),而且有更多的患者在进一步就诊时无需麻醉辅助治疗。同时,3-6 岁年龄组每次就诊的治疗量较高,因为治疗一颗乳牙所需的时间比治疗一颗恒牙要短。副作用(视幻觉、复视、多动、流泪和攻击性)在年龄较小的组别中更常见,但情绪不稳定在两个组别中表现相同:为了最大限度地提高口服镇静剂的效果,有必要考虑到拟议手术的持续时间和创伤性、年龄心理的特殊性以及男孩和女孩心理发展的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stomatologiya
Stomatologiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信