Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Preparation of Curved Mesial Canals of Mandibular Molars – An In Vitro Study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Preparation of Curved Mesial Canals of Mandibular Molars – An In Vitro Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Curved mesial roots can be challenging for different stages of endodontic treatment. Preparation aims to enlarge, clean, and shape the root canal system, and hundreds of systems are available to carry it out. Aiming to maintain pericervical dentin, minimally invasive preparation was proposed, and with it, instruments with lower tapers emerged. This study aimed to evaluate the increase in canal volume, the centering ability of the instruments, and root canal transportation of two different rotary systems with lower tapers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Eighteen curved mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars were scanned by micro-CT at 3 moments: initial and after the 2 stages of endodontic preparation. The canals were prepared using TruNatomy (TN) and ProDesign Logic 2 (PDL2) instruments up to sizes 25.04 and 26.04, respectively, and after 36.03 and 35.05, respectively. The data were analyzed using parametric and </span>nonparametric tests with a significance level of 5%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>TN and PDL2 systems showed no difference regarding the increase in the volume of the canals with the first instruments, but after preparation with a diameter size of 35 or 36, there was a difference (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) between the systems in the cervical and middle thirds.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both systems shaped the mesial canals of mandibular molars while keeping low transportation and good centering ability in enlargements up to diameter size 35 or 36 with tapers of 3 or 5%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Curved mesial roots can be challenging for different stages of endodontic treatment. Preparation aims to enlarge, clean, and shape the root canal system, and hundreds of systems are available to carry it out. Aiming to maintain pericervical dentin, minimally invasive preparation was proposed, and with it, instruments with lower tapers emerged. This study aimed to evaluate the increase in canal volume, the centering ability of the instruments, and root canal transportation of two different rotary systems with lower tapers.

Methods

Eighteen curved mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars were scanned by micro-CT at 3 moments: initial and after the 2 stages of endodontic preparation. The canals were prepared using TruNatomy (TN) and ProDesign Logic 2 (PDL2) instruments up to sizes 25.04 and 26.04, respectively, and after 36.03 and 35.05, respectively. The data were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric tests with a significance level of 5%.

Results

TN and PDL2 systems showed no difference regarding the increase in the volume of the canals with the first instruments, but after preparation with a diameter size of 35 or 36, there was a difference (P < .01) between the systems in the cervical and middle thirds.

Conclusion

Both systems shaped the mesial canals of mandibular molars while keeping low transportation and good centering ability in enlargements up to diameter size 35 or 36 with tapers of 3 or 5%.

下颌磨牙弯曲中轴管微创制备的评估 - 体外研究。
介绍:对于不同阶段的牙髓治疗来说,弯曲的中根都具有挑战性。根管预备的目的是扩大、清洁和成形根管系统,目前有数百种系统可供使用。为了保持根尖周的牙本质,微创预备被提出,随之而来的是锥度较小的器械的出现。本研究旨在评估两种不同的低锥度旋转系统的根管容积增加情况、器械的中心定位能力以及根管运输情况:通过 micro-CT 扫描了拔出的下颌磨牙的 18 个弯曲中牙根,扫描时间分为三个阶段:初始阶段和牙髓预备两个阶段之后。使用 TruNatomy(TN)和 ProDesign Logic 2(PDL2)器械分别制备了 25.04 和 26.04 尺寸的根管,以及 36.03 和 35.05 尺寸的根管。数据采用参数和非参数检验进行分析,显著性水平为 5%:结果:TN和PDL2系统在使用第一批器械时,在增加牙槽骨体积方面没有差异,但在直径为35或36的预备后,则存在差异(p结论:这两种系统都能对下颌磨牙的中轴管进行塑形,同时在扩大到直径 35 或 36、锥度为 3 或 5%时保持较低的运输量和良好的居中能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信